Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research study on the use of cooperative learning
Research study on the use of cooperative learning
Cooperative method teaching
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Research study on the use of cooperative learning
Annotated bibliography on how co-teaching enable us to differentiate instruction more effectively.
Differentiated instruction involves instructional practices and teaching strategies that are inclusive in nature, practices that enable all children succeed in the general education classroom and curriculum. Recent research indicates co-teaching is in fact an effective means to meeting the needs of individual students. This two definitions provided an interesting focus for my annotated bibliography on how co-teaching can help in delivering effective differentiated instruction.
The five articles annotated below show a strong correlation between differentiation and co-teaching.
1. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Graetz, J., Norland, J., Gardizi, W., & Mcduffie, K. (2005). Case Studies in Co-Teaching in the Content Areas. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(5),
…show more content…
Station teaching has been identified in the paper as a preferred model of co-teaching. The article talks about how station teaching is effective in delivering the math and science lessons in the secondary level. Station teaching also encourages the use of technology and communication the student-to teacher ratios is then decreased and this leads to small-groups getting better guidance and instruction from the teachers.
I think that the article has a narrow focus towards identifying station teaching as a preferable model of co-teaching. There are a lot of other positive models in the education research field that can complement the station teaching to maximize differentiation in co-taught situations.
5. Conderman, G., & Hedin, L. (2014). Differentiating instruction in co-taught classrooms for students with emotional/behavior difficulties. Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties, 20(4), 349-361.
Co-teaching is the collaboration of two or more credentialed teaching professionals, most typically a general education teacher and a special education teacher. To truly qualify as a co-teaching model, each teacher must be actively involved in the teaching of the lessons. Each teacher contributes their own unique expertise to the planning, instruction, and managing of all students in the classroom. If executed in this way, co-teaching can enhance the learning environment and involve and engage all students in the classroom. All students, from the academically gifted to the academically challenged, can benefit from the increased engaged time and more diverse instruction which the co-teaching model offers.
Mary King is a student-centered teacher who takes pride and values the relationships she forms with her students. Her classroom is a safe and trusting environment where all the students are welcomed. As a special education teacher of fifteen years who has successfully experienced co-teaching, she is motivated by seeing her students succeed. In this case, Mary is trying to make things work with Helen for the sake of one particular student, Jim O’Hara. Her lack of assertiveness right from their first initial meeting and onward leads to their unsuccessful teaching experience because in order for all their students to be successful the teachers must have a professional co-teaching experience.
The incorporation is fruitful when the understudies without exceptional necessities acknowledge the understudies with uncommon requirements which lead for peer acknowledgment and associate coaching (McGregor, Halvorsen, Fisher, Pumpian, Bhaerman, and Salisbury, 1998; Tichenor, Heins, and Piechura-Couture, 1998) as cited in Holmberg (2016). Cooperation inside understudies advances peer direction in learning process. Cooperation inside learning group causes them to learn together and recognize their capabilities (Wegner, 1998) as cited in Holmberg (2016). Other communitarian models that are frequently utilized as a part of the classroom setting are as takes after: Joining: In this model the custom curriculum instructor is doled out to a review level group to offer help in instructional systems, adjustments, and conduct techniques. Co-instructing: The custom curriculum and general training educators educate together in a common classroom. The two instructors are in charge of working with understudies with extraordinary necessities and all educating
In this education system, teachers and students are equal in their positions. “ The problem-posing method does not dichotomize the activity of the teacher-student: she is not cognitive at one point and narrative at another”(Freire 80). It means the relationship between teachers and students are changed. Students are not passive in this kind of education system. For example, in problem-posing education, teachers and students discuss together to figure out answers. In addition, by claiming “ The teacher is no longer merely the-one-who-teaches, but one who is himself taught in dialogue with the students, who in turn while being taught also teach”, Freire expressed that teachers and students in problem-posing education system have more communication and they are not necessary opposite position (Freire 80). Because, teachers are not required to know everything, and they can get knowledge from their students, which create a more harmonious relationship between teachers and students. Some teachers in CESL like to use problem-posing education. According to Melissa Brown, a teacher in CESL, she said “ I prefer solving the problems by communicate with students. I am happy to hear students’ opinions and problems in classes” (Brown). She also said she felt happy when students are interested in what she taught. Freire claimed that “ Whereas banking education anesthetizes and inhibits
Differentiated instruction is a teaching theory based on the premise that instructional approaches should vary and be adapted in relation to individual and diverse students in classrooms (Tomlinson, 2001). All though, “every teacher who has entered into a classroom has differentiated their instruction in one way or another.” (Levy, 2008) Teacher can use differentiated instruction in four elements, including content, process, products and the learning environment.
I believe that collaboration is extremely beneficial for the educational growth of our students. On Wednesday, January 24th I had the opportunity to attend a coaching workshop on Flipped Lessons. I was amazed with the the collaboration that went on in the room. We learned skills that we will be able to utilize with our students. This evidence supports element 6-4. I have also learned a lot about collaboration from my site mentor, my team members, and the grade level teachers at my site . A perfect example is the suggestion my site mentor did when I was teaching the number line. She suggested I use a whiteboard so that the students were able to interact when learning the new technique. I tried it and definitely made an improvement. My group
Northwestern High School is where I observed a co-ed English class. There were two teachers working together within the classroom. The teacher’s educational goals for their classes were to improve students reading and writing. Both teaching methods were effective as they both stood up in front of the class and lectured while also having class discussion. Instructional technology was big in the classroom and helping with the lesson. I always want to incorporate technology because it makes learning fun. Each student had his or her own laptop that they were assigned to and held responsible to keep up with. They completed their work on the laptop. Students also had handouts they were to follow along with the teacher while going over the material.
Daniel, K. (1995). The Learning and Teaching Environment. Available: http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/research/CMC/andrea95/node4.html. Last accessed 29 OCT 2011.
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2009). Learners with Emotional or Behavioral
When teachers differentiate their lesson, the students are more engaged to learn. Students have some choice in their learning activities, which motivates students to want to learn and also puts more learning responsibility on the students. Some students may prefer to work alone or in groups and some students like to be hands-on. By differentiating the lesson, all students’ needs are being met. “Differentiated Instruction gives students a range of ways to access curriculum, instruction and assessment. DI engages students to interact and participate in the classroom in a richer way. It is based on the assumption that all students differ in their learning styles, strengths, needs and abilities and that classroom activities should be adapted to meet these differences
Mathews, M. (1992). Gifted Students Talk About Cooperative Learning. Educational Leadership, 50. Retrieved March 10, 2003, from http://www.ascd.org/readingroom/edlead/92101mathews.html.
There is also a need of formal cooperative learning methods in the classrooms. In my future classroom, I will make sure that students work in groups and perform better in team tasks. For example, participate in mini-lessons, share their written work and provide feedback to each other in the writer’s workshop. This helps in providing better ideas on enhancing the knowledge and proves to be better in effective writing and group works. I will also work in a team which helps
Anderson, K. M. (2007). Differentiating Instruction to include all Students. Tips for teaching , 49-54.
Powell, M. and Bryan Dyson. “Cooperative Learning,” Classroom Compass 1.2 (1994): 2-4. Web. 30 Mar. 2014.
Perry described the co-teacher’s role in the classroom as a continuum (2005). The form of collaboration that requires the least interaction with colleagues include methods such as project-based learning and sequential teaching, where one colleague creates the lesson, and the other delivers it (Aliakbari & Bazyar, 2012); whereas a higher level of collaboration might include “planning, teaching, and evaluating” together (Perry 2005). In other words, the teachers must work together to create a course in which they agree upon common goals, objectives, and outcomes. The composition of instructors in the team taught classroom depends on these course goals, objectives, and outcomes. For example, one common team teaching practice used in classrooms that focus on social justice education is to form teams comprised of racially diverse instructors (Garran, Aymer, Gelman, & Miller 2015; Ouellett & Fraser,