Animals: Off The Menu Or Should We Feed Them Up To Suffer?

671 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay eating meat health

Once King Lear turned to the blind Earl of Gloucester and asked, “How do you see the world?” The Gloucester replied, “I see it feelingly” Shouldn’t we all? The fact is, that eating meat is criticised on health and is considered as ethically wrong. So, with all these negative consequences of eating meat you would think that actions are being advocated. Animals must be taken off the menu.

Animals must be taken off the menu because; today nine million animals will be killed in slaughterhouses. The human race today, will have the blood of nine million cows, pigs, chickens, turkeys and sheep on their hands. These animals will scream in terror, in cages, small sheds and slaughterhouses- vile confinements of utter despair. How can slaughter ever be humane? Due to these ghastly prisons we call slaughterhouses the level of cruelty that animals are victims to have become demoralised as ‘causality’. Evidently, these animals will suffer from physical and physiological pain. They will suffer for you own beefing and selfish pleasure.

We are enslaving these animals.

Controversial principles such as racism or sexism are the attitude of bias to the members that are similar in race or gender. However, humans are not the only victims of this atrocity; innocent animals are victims of Speciesism. According to the English oxford dictionary speciesism is the assumption of human superiority. Are we exploiting them for our own needs? It goes without saying that, the need of food and water, compassion, shelter and prevention of pain are desired by you and the animals that you kill. When we ache, we ache as equals. The killing of a whale in terms of pain is equal to that of a child.

Who gave you the right to slaughter?

Incidentally, our Planet is al...

... middle of paper ...

...
In contrast, several claim that meat has been an essential part of human evolution. Meat is found in the ancestral diet; it has been said to be apart of the human evolution for 2.3 million years. The dense portion of protein was essential for the development of the human brain. Nevertheless, according to the American Dietetic Association, a vegetarian diet can meet the protein requirement for a healthy lifestyle. Furthermore, the Human anatomy has evolved and can support a vegetarian diet.

To conclude, by taking animals off the menu you can aid the environment, feed the starving population and end cruelty, we shouldn’t be “loving it!” It is wrong to murder at our peril. Justice must be blind to race, religion and species. You must speak for those with no voices. In the words of Paul McCartney, “If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be a vegetarian.”

Show More
Related

  • More Pros Than Cons In A Meat-Free Life Analysis

    125 Words  | 1 Pages

    The argumentative article “More Pros than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” authored by Marjorie Lee Garretson was published in the student newspaper of the University of Mississippi in April 2010. In Garretson’s article, she said that a vegetarian lifestyle is the healthy life choice and how many people don’t know how the environment is affected by their eating habits. She argues how the animal factory farms mistreat the animals in an inhumane way in order to be sources of food. Although, she did not really achieve the aim she wants it for this article, she did not do a good job in trying to convince most of the readers to become vegetarian because of her writing style and the lack of information of vegetarian

    Read More

  • The Beef With Meat By Jonathan Foer

    1400 Words  | 3 Pages

    Most of us do not think twice about the foods we pick up from the supermarket. Many Americans have a preconceived belief that the food being sold to us is safe, and withholds the highest standard of quality. Certainly, compared to many places in the world, this is true. But is the United States sincerely trying to carry out these standards, or have we begun to see a reverse in the health and safety of our food- and more explicitly in our meat? Jonathan Foer, author of “Eating Animals” argues for reform within the food industry- not only for the humane treatment of animals but moreover for our own health. Although Foer exposes the ills within the food industries in order to persuade readers to change their diets for the better, his “vegetarianism or die” assessment may be too extreme for most Americans. The true ills do not start with the meat, but with industrialized production of it through methods practiced by factory farming.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nonhuman Animals

    1228 Words  | 3 Pages

    We brutally inflict pain upon the animals, not exclusively in the final moments as they are being slaughtered, but for the most part, during their entire life. Many animals know nothing other than a life in a dark, crowded barn or factory treated as meat before they are even killed. These terrible conditions blatantly show that we do not care about these animals and we simply rear and kill them in order to satisfy our trivial interests. The cruelty imposed upon these helpless animals is shocking and it is not rare for people to turn a blind eye to the brutality. Another commonplace would be for a meat consumer to say that humans are “ends in themselves, while everything other than a person can only have value for a person” (C. Vlastos). People believe that animals are on this earth simply for human consumption, which can be easily

    Read More

  • Morality and Ethics in Vegetarianism

    717 Words  | 2 Pages

    “The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."( Schopenhauer). Vegetarianism and animal rights movement have been crossing each other since 70’s. The meeting point between two is veganism which means strict vegetarianism. Vegetarianism was firstly founded as being formed on ethical issues and then it became mostly based on health reasons. Even though vegetarianism has evolved drastically over time, some of its current forms have come back full circle to its early days, when vegetarianism was an ethical-philosophical choice, not a mere health choice.

    Read More

  • Why I Gave Up Being A Vegetarianism

    1080 Words  | 3 Pages

    For me, the decision to remove meat from my diet stemmed solely from the belief that humans have no right to eat any living creature — period. In short, I believe all lives have equal value, even if they’re a non-human animal. An offshoot from this, which also helped fuel my vegetarianism, includes the horrendous treatment animals endure for the sake of consumption.

    Read More

  • Summary Of An Animals Place By Michael Pollan

    497 Words  | 1 Pages

    “An Animals’ Place” by Michael Pollan is an article that describes our relationship and interactions with animals. The article suggests that the world should switch to a vegetarian diet, due to the mistreatment of animals. The essay includes references from animal rights activists and philosophers. These references are usually logical statement that compare humans and non-human animals in multiple levels, such as intellectual and social.

    Read More

  • Essay About Eating Meat

    976 Words  | 2 Pages

    Meat has become a part of our culture in our country, where it is expected as part of each meal of the day. But the production of the meat raises questions on whether eating meat is ethical in people’s eyes. Studies in recent years have shown that the growing impact of our meat eating culture, has negatively affected different aspects around us. The problem is not about whether people should or should not eat meat, but that we should focus on how the production of meat can have negative affects and how we can limit those problems.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Abusing

    1025 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unfortunately, most people do not see the connection between consuming meat and encouraging animal abusing. Animal abusing is described generally as any act or omission that causes unnecessary or unreasonable harm to an animal. The animals like chicken, pigs, cows and turkey are confined in tightly packed cages for twenty four hours a day without fresh air and sunlight. In the cages, animals are brutally attacked and tortured by the factory workers (PETA). The cows are repeatedly impregnated after every four months and boosted with hormones, so they can provide more milk. Most of the animals often experience stress, various diseases and contamination in their living sheds due to the congested area. The chickens are pumped with hormones that cause their body mass to grow rapidly, but their muscle does not grow as much as the body mass. As a result, chickens cannot stand or walk properly and are unable to compete with others to get the food; resulting in death. Additionally, when cows are useless, they are brought up to the slaughterhouses where their throats are incised with the knife, while they are still conscious (PETA). The animals are experiencing all these abuses for the taste of our mouth. Most people do not think about these inhumane practices while purchasing meats from the

    Read More

  • Ethics and Morality in Vegetarianism

    1942 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The assumption that animals are without rights, and the illusion that their treatment has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."(Schopenhauer). I always wondered why some people are not so drawn to the consumption of meat and fed up with only one thought about it. Why so many people loathe of blood, and why so few people can easily kill and be slaughter animal, until they just get used to it? This reaction should say something about the most important moments in the code, which was programmed in the human psyche. Realization the necessity of refraining from meat is especially difficult because people consume it for a long time, and in addition, there is a certain attitude to the meat as to the product that is useful, nourishing and even prestigious. On the other hand, the constant consumption of meat has made the vast majority of people completely emotionless towards it. However, there must be some real and strong reasons for refusal of consumption of meat and as I noticed they were always completely different. So, even though vegetarianism has evolved drastically over time, some of its current forms have come back full circle to resemble that of its roots, when vegetarianism was an ethical-philosophical choice, not merely a matter of personal health.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of An Animal Place By Michael Pollan

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    Michael Pollan presents many convincing arguments that strengthen his position on whether slaughtering animals is ethical or not. He believes that every living being on this planet deserves an equal amount of respect regardless of it being an animal or human, after all humans are also animals. “An Animal’s place” by Michael Pollan is an opinionated piece that states his beliefs on whether animals should be slaughtered and killed to be someone’s meal or not. In his article, Pollan does not just state his opinions as a writer but also analyzes them from a reader’s point of view, thus answering any questions that the reader might raise. Although Pollan does consider killing and slaughtering of animals unethical, using environmental and ethical

    Read More

  • The Problem With Speciesism

    1118 Words  | 3 Pages

    Speciesism is the belief that humans are inherently superior to all other animals, solely based on their species membership. This widely held belief is used to justify the blatant discrimination of nonhuman animals, resulting in a lack of moral rights and the exploitation of defenseless beings.

    Read More

  • Should We Be Vegetarians?

    1159 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this paper I will look at the argument made by James Rachels in his paper, The Moral Argument for Vegetarianism supporting the view that humans should be vegetarians on moral grounds. I will first outline the basis of Rachels’ argument supporting vegetarianism and his moral objection to using animals as a food source and critique whether it is a good argument. Secondly, I will look at some critiques of this kind of moral argument presented by R. G. Frey in his article, Moral Vegetarianism and the Argument from Pain and Suffering. Finally, I will show why I support the argument made by Frey and why I feel it is the stronger of the two arguments and why I support it.

    Read More

  • Why Eating Meat is Morally Impermissible

    1449 Words  | 3 Pages

    Vegetarians are uncomfortable with how humans treat animals. Animals are cruelly butchered to meet the high demand and taste for meat in the market. Furthermore, meat-consumers argue that meat based foods are cheaper than plant based foods. According to Christians, man was given the power to dominate over all creatures in the world. Therefore, man has the right to use animals for food (Singer and Mason, 2007). However, it is unjustified for man to treat animals as he wishes because he has the power to rule over animals. This owes to the reality that it is unclear whether man has the right to slaughter animals (haphazardly), but it is clear that humans have a duty to take care of animals. In objection, killing animals is equal to killing fellow humans because both humans and animals have a right to life. Instead of brutally slaying animals, people should consume their products, which...

    Read More

  • It is Better to be a Vegetarian

    1128 Words  | 3 Pages

    For several years the issue of eating meat has been a great concern to all types of people all over the world. In many different societies controversy has began to arise over the morality of eating meat from animals. A lot of the reasons for not eating meat have to deal with religious affiliations, personal health, animal rights, and concern about the environment. Vegetarians have a greater way of expressing meats negative effects on the human body whereas meat eaters have close to no evidence of meat eating being a positive effect on the human body. Being a vegetarian is more beneficial for human beings because of health reasons, environmental issues, and animal rights.

    Read More

  • Should we all become vegetarians?

    796 Words  | 2 Pages

    As we can now observe, vegetarianism has become something fashionable, and the number of people who reject eating meat is constantly increasing. In Britain, for instance, over 5 million people have done it so far. It is obviously connected with the recent animal diseases, but this tendency is likely to spread on the other regions of the world. However, it is not only a fashion or fear of illnesses. I myself became a vegetarian about 2 years ago, and I can see a number of reasons why people should stop eating meat. They are mainly of ethic, economic and health type. Those who think in an ecological way should also be aware of how this meat consumption ruins our environment. I don’t have an intention to force anybody to become a vegetarian, but I hope that my argumentation would be strong enough to make some people think about it, at least. In this essay I will try to present this point of view, expressing my personal feelings and showing scientific facts about the problem.

    Read More

More about Animals: Off The Menu Or Should We Feed Them Up To Suffer?

Open Document