Persuasive Essay: Why Animal Testing Should Be Wrong?

Animal testing is the use of animals for scientific and medical research purposes. Animal Research is very customary nowadays, and it became a common and an accepted means of testing by the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The views of the public diverge greatly whether animal experimentation leads to medical breakthroughs or such progress is achievable by other means. The views depend on one’s own ethical and moral values and standards. Although many people believe that animal experimentation should be carried out and is justified due to several reasons, animal experimentation should be abolished because it is a very cruel and dishonest method of testing, it is unnecessary, unreliable, and may lead to the experimenters becoming inhumane.

They have rights just like humans and they should get to choose the way they live. We as humans should provide this right to animals. Animal rights are usually ignored just because of their lack of ability to reason. This inability should not be a factor that justifies animal tests. In addition, just as it is morally wrong to subject humans to pain it is wrong to do it to animals. Animals have been used in research for more than 2,000 years. In The third century B.C., Erasistratus of Alexandria used animals to study bodily function. When live animals are used, this practice is called vivisection. A word that originally meant cutting, or performing surgery on a living animal (Nancy Day 13). Animals do feel pain. It is just that they are ignored because animals do not have a voice and that they cannot reason. There is also research that proves that mice and other animals do experience various intensities of pain and many of the emotions

Alternative methods include EpiSkin, EpiDerm, and SkinEthic are artificial skin and can save thousands of rabbits from skin corrosion and irritation tests .There has been research that proves that alternatives can be more accurate than animal tests and instead of reducing the animals required in animal tests, those methods can render the animal tests as unnecessary. For example there was research published in the BMC Genomics journal by BioMed Central open that had revealed that the response of the laboratory grown human cells can be used to classify chemicals and it can also be used to predict the strength of allergic responses thus providing a good alternative to animal testing. Alternative methods are based on experiments on human cells carried out in vitro (i.e. test tubes), and on computer models (Peta.org par. 2). These techniques are more sophisticated and more precise in comparison to the traditional animal testing method. Also, the results obtained by carrying out in vitro tests are as accurate or more accurate compared to the results that are obtained when the same experiment is carried out on animals (Peta.org par.4). Therefore, time, money, and our mental skills should be used to develop these alternative