Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits of animal testing
Benefits of animal testing
Benefits of animal research and testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits of animal testing
Animal Testing Should Not Banned A 2011 poll of nearly 1,000 biomedical scientists conducted by the science journal Nature found that more than 90% "agreed that the use of animals in research is essential. Here are some facts that may set your mind at ease if you are against animal testing, “People in the United States eat 9 billion chickens and 150 million cattle, pigs, and sheep annually, yet we only use around 26 million animals for research, 95% of which are rodents, birds and fish” (ProCon.org). Primates such as cats, dogs and other house animals account for less than .02% of research animals in the UK, and more than 97% of the research is done on mice, birds and fish (Understanding Animal Research). According to Animal Testing and Medicine, But with animal testing, developers of these products are able to conduct trial and error to learn more about providing consumers with the best possible goods. With this method, people are assured of never being exposed to any harmful toxins or chemicals… Now, scientist argue that testing cosmetics on animals before introducing them to the public is needed for the process, or people would be exposed to products that are potentially harmful. (Green "AMP." 2016. Animal Research. 2 November 2016 . Baxamusa, Batul Nafisa. "Buzzle." 8 August 2016. All the Animal Testing Pros and Cons That You Never Knew About. 3 November 2016 . "Green Garage." 12 Pros and Cons of Animal Testing on Cosmetics. GreenGarageBlog.org. 7 November 2016 . Hajar, Rachel. "Animal Testing and Medicine." 12 Jan-Mar 2011. NCBI. US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health. 1 November 2016 . Meadows, Michelle. "U.S. Food & Drug." Jan-Feb 2006. Promoting Safe and Effective Drugs for 100 Years. 3 November 2016 . Murnaghan, Ian. "About Animal Testing." 1 November 2016. Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons. 3 November 2016 . "News Medical Life Sciences ." 18 November 2004. Animal research and it's benefits to both humans and animals. 9 November 2016 . ProCon.org. "Animal Testing ProCon.org." 24 May 2016. ProCon.org. 1 November 2016 . Suzi. "Cruelty Free Kitty." 8 April 2016. Companies That Test on Animals/ Cruelty Free-Brand Makeup. Cruelty-Free Kitty. 7 November 2016 . "Understanding Animal Research." 11 September 2014. Forty reasons why we need animals in research. 2 November 2016
The information that animals have provided scientists over the past decades has changed society, and is still changing society for the better. Millions of lives have been saved with the use of animal testing and many more will be saved with continued research. However, there are many who dismiss this monumental achievement completely and oppose the use of animals in laboratory research. Though many find this practice to be
Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation and animal research, is using various nonhuman animals experiments, whether it be a psychological or physical test of the animal, or testing medicines and cosmetics to determine if they are good enough for human use and consumption.This specific kinds of research are often conducted at various medical institutes, universities, pharmaceutical companies, and commercial facilities that does the task of testing the products on the animals. Each year, more than 100 million animals are used and die in the name of scientific research. Those animals include rats (12%), frogs (1%), cats (0.8%), dog (0.6%), mice (69%), monkeys (0.1%), guinea pigs (1%), rabbits (1%), fish (10%), and birds (4%). (BBC) Just like anything else, animal research has its pros and cons, but in this case, the cons severely outweigh the pros.
Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.
Point of view: Web. 14 February 2016. The article provides specific examples of illnesses and diseases which have been cured by animal testing that both humans and animals have benefitted from. This supports my topic of animal experiments being used for medical advancements. Pointing out that law often requires that products be tested before being sold to the public, George and Wagner additionally help prove my claim that product testing is a purpose of animal experimentation.
...duce the use of animals for scientific research. In the meantime, animals should continue to be used for scientific research only when there are no other alternatives. As mentioned above, animal testing is still essential to ensure safety and efficacy for human consumption and without the assurances, products may have hidden dangers for human consumption and still be put into market because companies are unaware of the dangers.
Sun, Shany. "The Truth Behind Animal Testing." Young Scientists Journal 5.12 (2012): 83-85. Academic Search Complete. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
Is the use of animals in research justified? Should animal experimentation be permitted? Should these animals be liberated? A logical person would say the benefits justify the research. Without animal testing, products would be based on theory. No one would want to use something, which may damage eyes, be poisonous, cancerous, and cause birth defects. Animals used in testing are not from the endangered species list; also many of the types of animals used are killed each year by rat or mouse traps, animal control, exterminators, and animal shelters. Animal testing reaps great benefits such as finding effective drugs to combat disease, improve surgical procedures, and make products safe.
194(6/2/2007): p46-49 Rowlinson, John. About Animal Testing. [online] http://www.aboutanimaltesting.co.uk/what-animal-testing.html, 2000-2010 Hutchinson, Tiana. Animal Rights. [online] http://www3.sympatico.ca/taniah/animal/, 2000 Tuomey, Enda.
In the twenty first century, we have so many other alternatives besides continuing to burn, shock, poison, starve, and kill over 100 million animals to test new household products and medicines when it has been proved that animal testing is an ineffective way to cure illnesses and improve human life. Animals do not suffer the same illnesses as humans do and injecting them into animals and studying the effects delays our time to further understand the sickness on an actual human. Seeing that an animals’ genetic makeup is much different from a humans then certain medicines that work on animals more often than not are not effective on humans. Therefore, results are often very misleading. “Animals are fed harmful substances, infected with lethal viruses, subjected to brain damage, heart attacks, strokes, and cancers”(“What’s Wrong With…”). Through a humane perspective, the murder of millions of animals is a disturbing thought to hold. As a country, we continue to remain oblivious to what continues to go on behind laboratory doors for cosmetic, medical, and industrial purposes.
Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the necessity to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.
According to the article” Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing,” animals’ rights are violated when the sciences are doing the research and there are many similar ways between humans and animals, such as how they feel and behave. Even though animals cannot express their opinions, they still feel, think, and experience pain. When the sciences use animals to do the research, humans still need to respect them because of animals’ rights. Animals have their opinions they cannot explain and humans have a duty to protect animals’ rights. Animal testing should be banned because humans need to respect their minds.
Should animal testing be banned? Now, animal testing is still a controversial subject, and the scientists are facing an increasing problem, with more and more people appealing to stop animal testing. The original purpose of animal testing was to invent drugs for human diseases. For example, Scutti (2013) states that 98 of Nobel Prizes awarded for Physiology or Medicine, 75 were directly dependent on research from animals. The four non-animal experiment prize winners also relied on the data, which were obtained from other animal research groups.
It is now required by law that cosmetics are tested for safety before being made available to the public. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is in charge of overseeing drug and cosmetic testing today. Animal testing was the most widespread form of cosmetic testing considered proven, but the technology that is now available may replace the need for animal test...
Animal testing has become extremely costly. Animal testing results are not quick, especially for cosmetics. When testing a product it needs to be continually applied to detect if it’s going to irritate the skin or eyes. This can take days or weeks. During this time you have to keep the animals alive long enough to see the result. Therefore also having to supply food and water costing even more $$$. For example the eye irritant test involving rabbits to see how a product or chemical will react on human eyes cost around 1,800$ while the alternative in vitro method only cost 1,400$. Not only is the alternative more accurate but its much more cost effective and over time those 400$ will add up. Another common example is the skin sensation test, which is where a product is placed on a shaved animals skin to see how it reacts. The cost for the animal test is 6,000$ and the alternative is only 3,000$. That is a lot of money that could be used to make the product better or for the company to keep.
Orlans, F. Barbara. In the Name of Science:Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation. New York: Oxford UP: Oxford UP, 1993.