It is unethical to allow the person who if profiting from such experiments to determine which tests should be performed as well as deciding on the quality of life these animals have while being used for research (Greek 88). Throughout the years, there have been several people who have argued that using animals for testing is a moral issue. Animals are unable vocalize their choices or decisions; therefore humans have often considered them as inferior species. People can donate their bodies to science, but animals are unable to express their wiliness to do so. Humans instead decide which animals are being used in research labs and the quality of life these animals have while being used for researched; however, it is the human making this choice, not the animal itself.
When it comes to the needless torture of animals that we claim to benefit, the animals lives need to be taken into consideration. S. F. Sapontzis gives his theory as to why animals should not be used in testing. To start with, animals are not capable of giving their consent to be used as subjects in an experiment. Secondly, "experiments can only be performed on an individual who is willing, morally speaking. Therefore it is immoral to use animals in experiments" (Sapontzis 209).
The use of nearly extinct animals just weakens our food chain by deleting them basically more and more, and it creates more fear of humans from the animal. Why not just use a human to get the exact symptoms or reaction from a drug? Most of the medicines tested on these animals have not shown the same side effects or reactions as it does on humans. Most the time it produces the exact opposite reaction on humans rather than an animal. Even the screaming of torture coming from the animals, the disease that purposely kills them, and the use of the testing for unnecessary products show arguing for animal testing is absurd.
People thought that experiments done on humans was corrupt. Today, most people still believe that human testing is wrong, yet they continue debate about whether animal testing is right or wrong. Although more people are against human testing and for animal testing, both humans and animals went through the same thing. None of them had any say in whether or not they wanted to participate in these excruciating experimentations. In addition, research done with animals causes physical pain, emotional stress, and death just as it would with experiments done on
One of the most touchy aspects of our relationship with animals is the use of animals in laboratory sciences. Some manufactures of cosmetics and household products still conduct painful and useless tests on live animals, even though no law requires them to do so. Some people, called anti-vivisectionists, are at one extreme in their concern. They want an abolition of all experiments on live animals. At the other extreme there are those who say that it is quite all right for us to do whatever we like to animals.
It has various advantages and disadvantages and they are mainly based on one deciding whether to criticize it as ethically and morally wrong or right. Animal experimentation is an unacceptable, cruel, and an inhumane procedure on animals. Animal experimentation is unacceptable and cruel procedure that should not be supported. Animal experiments violate the animal’s rights by denying them the right to live and die a natural death (Watson 92). This is because; the animals used for testing are killed after their use.
Scientists use animals instead of humans because experimenting against humans is viewed as impractical and unethical. The debate of animals being used in commercial products and educational exercises is an emotionally stimulated issue going on in modern society. Many animal rights groups, including PETA, have found that the way that animals are being treated during testing is morally wrong. Emotion may be the determining factor in deciding whether a person believes that animal testing is ethical or unethical. The use of animal testing has been beneficial, discovering many different medications that have saved human lives.
Although humans often benefit from successful animal research, the pain, the suffering, and the deaths of animals are not worth the possible human benefits. Therefore, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of products. First, animals' rights are violated when they are used in research. Tom Regan, a philosophy professor at North Carolina State University, states: "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment. .
So we are wasting precious dollars on cruel experiments. All of this is unethical, cruel, and disturbing which is only a few words to describe animal testing. This why animal testing is wrong so think about all those animals that are suffering before you buy make-up, medicine, and bathing products that have been tested on animals.
The United States is one of the two countries who test on primates. This needs to be fixed. Taking action will help make animal testing illegal. Innocent animals should not have to deal with what we put them through for our expense. These animals should live their life rather than humans taking it away from them.