Animal testing is a cruel and unethical method for testing purposes because alternative methods have been proven more effective and accurate than animal testing, and animals are harmed during procedures and not given any medication for pain. Also, how have the different parts of the world banned or taken action to stop animal testing? In 2014 we have made many alternative methods to stop animal testing and they will only get better and better as the years go on. Many animals are mistreated and scientists are carless of the animals. With all of these new advancements, how has the face of animal testing changed today?
For centuries, the use of animal experimentation in the biomedical field has been questioned ethically. Do the benefits of animals used in research outweigh the pain that the animals endure? Animal rights activists will argue that there are new alternatives that are more accurate than animal testing. Nonetheless, scientists will continue to use animals for the advancement in the medical field because there have been various cases where animals have paved the way, medically, for humans to this day. Additionally, testing on animals instead of humans puts humans out of harms way.
According to the US-based Foundation Biomedical Research, “animal research has played a vital role in virtually every major medical advance of the last century - for both human and veterinary health. From antibio... ... middle of paper ... ... a better way of animal testing. Instead of taking perfectly healthy animals, and holding them in captivity for testing, I think we should use older, slightly unhealthier animals for testing. Because those animals are already suffering, and are most likely to pass soon, than if the medicine they are testing works, than they will be benefited. But also if the medicine isn’t successful, then it wouldn’t make much of a loss.
Every year, over a million animals are tested on across the world. Animal experimentation is one of the most controversial issues. Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs. Some people believe that animal testing is unnecessary and there are more efficient alternatives. Others believe that animal testing is crucial to the development of new products and cures.
Using animals can help find cures faster and help prevent more human deaths. Although some people believe that's true, I have a different opinion. While reading articles from different doctors, I discovered that using animals in the medical area hasn't helped humans near what people think it has. Just because animals are living breathing creatures like us, doesn't mean their systems are anything like ours. In fact, they're not anything like ours.
One word comes to mind when I think of animal testing: cruel. Animal testing has been a subject of debate for many years. While most people think that using animals to test products is a reasonable approach, in reality the outcome does not always show how the products will react on humans, and the animals suffer unnecessarily. The United States needs to ban all animal testing like the European Union did because testing on animals is cruel and animals should not be dying from it. The testing of animals is rising from pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies because the companies are spending billions of dollars on animals testing in order to make products safer to humans.
From those earliest vaccines, some healthy children had contracted polio…To test the new vaccine before its administration to humans, animal subjects were absolutely essential” (CohenRegan). The essence of Cohen’s argument is that animal experimentation isn’t misleading. Cohen acknowledges that at the time of the outbreak of polio, other methods were used and were useless in finding a vaccine. That in order to find vaccines that are going to work it is necessary to do research on animals before testing on humans. Although humans are the best way of finding out the results of whether a vaccine is going to work, researchers can’t take the risk of infecting a healthy human being.
While there are advantages to animal experimentation, it does not ensure success in human clinical trials, there is no law protecting any animal from cruel experimentation, and some animals should not have to live in cruel facilities. According to several studies, animals have played a crucial role in medical advancement over the last century. The article “Alas, Animal Experiments are Still Needed,” explains that animals have been used for testing the safety of drugs and vaccines from common pain-killers to anti-cancer treatment. The article points out, “They may not be perfect and human trials are also vital, but without animals medical advances would seriously be hampered” (qtd. in “Alas” P2).
The last way animals are used for is genetic experiments to help scientist figure out how different genes work (“Animal Research”). Humans benefit a lot by using animals for experimentation. Without the animals it would be very difficult to find new medical and to save a lot of people’s lives. Animals are very necessary to save the lives of not only other animal... ... middle of paper ... ...d 3,000 different groups. Certain animal rights groups have acted out with violence against people who believe that animal experimentation is not a bad thing.
Without this experiment, the treatment for bacteria would have never been developed further. This experiment has saved millions of lives of not only humans but also animals. Furthermore, people might believe animal testing not only help saves human lives, but what many ... ... middle of paper ... ...century animals are kept like family and to save one family member is it okay to kill the other one? To conclude, if animal testing did not exist much of the work developed today by scientists would not be here. Dr. Michael E. Debakey said, “Not only one advancement in the care of patients, but advancements you use every day are developed by animal testing” (Debakey).