Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
banning animal testing
Should ànimals be used in research?
Should ànimals be used in research?
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: banning animal testing
Animal experimentation is the use of non-human animals in experiments. Animal experimentation also known as animal testing had established way back into the second century A.D. A Roman physician, named Galen started to perform endless animal experiments. (Safer Medicines.) On the other hand, the first major animal experiments occurred in the nineteenth century. Luis Pasteur administered anthrax to sheep. Anthrax is a bacterial disease that affects the skin and lungs in sheep and cattle, so Pasteur was responsible for this bacterial disease in these animals. Another man known as Ivan Pavlov conducted experiments on dogs and tested how their memory works with repetitive tasks. (Murnaghan)
In 1922, there was a breakthrough in animal experiments. Animal testing was now allowed to perform kidney dialysis, and “life-saving” treatments, on animals. Primate labs were now constructed to test on animals in a whole new diverse way. Animals were often given potent drugs such as cancer to see how they reacted to them and to see what was similar and different on how they reacted compared to humans. (Murnaghan)
In 1996, many doctors tried to clone sheep. Although, you would think animal testing would have stopped with their many unresolved treatments. Unfortunately, animal experimentation continued and peaked in the 1980’s. They only began to start testing cosmetics on animals when a woman had an incident while using her mascara, her mascara had went “awry” which in the end left her blind. (Murnaghan) The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) passed a law “The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.” Which allowed doctors to now test cosmetics on animals.
Unfortunately, animal testing also known as animal experimentation still c...
... middle of paper ...
... many?
Every day you can make a difference for animals who are currently suffering in labs, millions of animals are poisoned and killed for products like lipsticks, deodorant, soap, and toothpaste, etc. One of the many ways you can help is to shop cruelty-free, look for bunny logos on products that you buy. Another way is to join campaigns who are against animal testing, and to donate money. Also adopt animals and give them a loving home. (Animals Are Not Ours To Experiment On)
Works Cited
Group, Gale. “Animal Experimentation” Greenhaven Press. 2012. Print.
Murnaghan, Ian. “About Animal Testing.” 31, July 2010. Web. 28, Jan 2014.
N.P. “Animals Are Not Ours To Experiment On.” Peta2 Free For All. 2014. Web. 10, Jan. 2014.
N.P. “The Vegetarian Site.” 27, Jan 2014. Web. 30, Jan. 2014.
Safer Medicines. N.P. “Safer Medicines”. 2012. Web. 27, Jan. 2014.
The information that animals have provided scientists over the past decades has changed society, and is still changing society for the better. Millions of lives have been saved with the use of animal testing and many more will be saved with continued research. However, there are many who dismiss this monumental achievement completely and oppose the use of animals in laboratory research. Though many find this practice to be
Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.
Hundreds of millions of animals lives are taken each year because of the “necessity” of testing products that don’t apply to animals whatsoever. Therefor, I hold my stance as an advocate, or being against animal testing in general. There are many advocates for this topic which is a positive aspect, but it is still happening out there. Once again I believe animals should not be tested on for products because all living things should be treated humanely, there are other ways to test products, and millions of animals are put to their death because of the
Animals have always held a very special place in the hearts of the human race. They are our best friends, our stress relievers, members of our families, and our test subjects for experimentation. For hundreds of years, animals have been used in laboratory settings as a replacement for humans when studying the effects of medical treatments. On average, nearly one hundred million animals are used in clinical trials every year (Ferdowsian). These animals have contributed to hundreds of breakthroughs in the medical field including countless toxicity tests to determine drug toxicity to humans, and exposure to paralyzing anesthetics to create anesthesia used in surgical procedures today. These animals have been vital
In modern society, animal experimentation has triggered a controversy; consequently, vast amount of protests have been initiated by the animal rights community. Although these organizations have successfully broadcast their concerns toward animal experimentation, its application continues to survive. Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley inform that there remain fifty million to one-hundred million animals that experience testing or experimentation throughout the world on a yearly basis. But despite opposition, animal experimentation, the use of experiments on animals in order to observe the effects an unknown substance has on living creatures, serves multiple purposes. Those particular purposes are: research of the living body, the testing of products, and the advancement of medicine.
Using animals for medical experimentation, product testing, and education is a controversial subject that often leads to a large argument. While the problems can go into detail, the suffering involved in animal experimentation is painfully clear. Every year there are tens of millions of animals that die in federally and privately funded experiments. A projected 90 percent of all animals used in research are rats and mice, and many other species including guinea pigs, dogs, cats, rabbits, nonhuman primates, and farm animals are killed every year to animal testing. (UGA) The experimentation of animals and testing has not stopped because it is not the most accurate or reliable means of research, but because of the tradition, peer pressure, and large amounts of funding from those with strong invested interests into the business. (UGA)
Each year, millions of animals, ranging from mice to monkeys, suffer through the cruel and inhumane practice of animal testing. Scientist throughout the world are torturing animals for mankind’s own benefit, which is unreliable in most cases. “According to Humane Society International, animals that are used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing processes and the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies.” Although humans often benefit from successful animal research, these animals do not have a voice to say no. The pain, suffering, and deaths inflicted on these animals are not worth the possible human benefits. Scientist test the animals for many products that we humans can use (makeup, medicine, etc.). Many of the items we purchase on a regular basis have been tested on animals first. Most of the animal testing is unreliable.
Throughout history, beginning as early as 500 BC, animals have been used to test products that will later be utilized by humans (“Animal Testing” 4), what isn’t publicly discussed is the way it will leave the animals after the process is done. Many innocent rabbits, monkeys, mice, and even popular pets such as dogs are harmed during the testing application of cosmetics, medicine, perfumes, and many other consumer products (Donaldson 2). Nevertheless, there are many people whom support the scandal because "it is a legal requirement to carry out animal testing to ensure they are safe and effective” for human benefit (Drayson). The overall question here is should it even be an authorized form of experimentation in the United States, or anywhere else? The fact of the matter is that there are alternatives to remove animals out of the equation for good (“Alternatives” 1). They are cheaper, and less invasive than the maltreatment of the 26 million innocent animals that are subjected to the heartlessness of testing each year (“Animal Testing” 4). All in all, due to the harsh effects of animal testing, it should be treated as animal cruelty in today’s society.
Hundreds and millions of animals are killed everyday due to animal testing. The number of animal deaths in labs have halved since the 1970’s. An animal dies in a Canadian lab every 16 seconds! The contemporary scale of animal deaths due to animal testing is unacceptable! 17-22 million animals are tested on each year and at least half are put to death. 2.5 million animals are killed due to animal testing at the Great Britain Zoo every year. Animal testing essentially involves harming or killing the animals, every year so many innocent animals are put to death on behalf of our a...
The Cruelty of Cosmetic Testing on Animals Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the need to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.
Hundreds of the tests that are used in cosmetic testing don’t even prove that is safe enough to distribute the product. Even if animals are closest to us genetically they’re still not close enough and tests that work on animals will most likely not work on humans. People mainly still test on animals only because it’s an old habit for companies it’s hard to stop testing once you already have. Luckily, many people are researching other ways to make sure products are safe without testing on animal. The results are so unreliable, animals are dying for no
Throughout centuries medical research has been conducted on animals. “Animals were used in early studies to discover how blood circulates through the body, the effect of anesthesia, and the relationship between bacteria and disease” (AMA 59). Experiments such as these seem to be outdated and actually are by today’s means, scientists now study commonly for three general purposes: (1) biomedical and behavioral research, (2) education, (3) drug and product testing (AMA 60). These three types of experiments allow scientists to gain vast amounts of knowledge about human b...
Millions of animals are used to test consumer products, but they also become victims to experiments for medical research. In The Ethics of Animal Research (2007) both authors state that there have been many medical advances with the development of medicines and treatments as a result of research conducted on animals (para 1). These medical i...
In one study conducted at a high school by Antonia Hall on a scale of 1-5 of awareness about this issue 52 percent of participants answered at a level three; not a single student answered any higher than that (Hall, 2014). Awareness is extremely low in this country and out of those who are aware the majority say they want to put an end to the suffering. In a survey conducted by PCRM 78 percent of people surveyed admitted that alternatives are incredibly important to develop alternatives to animal testing (New Survey, 2011). In another portion of that same survey 61 percent of those surveyed said that cosmetic testing on animals should be illegal; that’s more than half of those surveyed (New Survey, 2011). In the last portion of the survey 58 percent of participants said they will purchase cruelty-free personal care products (New Survey, 2011). In the study conducted at a high school in Fredericksburg, Virginia 25 students were asked six questions related to the topic of cosmetic testing on animals and their awareness related to it; when asked how many ads in the news, TV, or newspapers only 44 percent had seen more than just one or two (Hall, 2014). A national poll conducted in the year of 2013 the findings showed that over half of young adults showed opposition to cosmetic testing on animals (Hall, 2014). Finally, more than 70 percent of americans are against testing on animals for lipstick, eyeshadow, and other cosmetics (New Survey, 2014). In 2009, Europe testing on animals was illegalized (Cohan, 2014). Creating great strides in the leaping bunny
It still comes as a surprise to me that with all the technology in today’s society, we are still relying on animals for cosmetic research. Some people think that it is acceptable and even justified to test on mere animals rather than risk hurting people. So, for these kinds of people, animal testing makes perfect sense. However, in my opinion, animals are living creatures and have the right to live out their lives as nature intended rather than simply surviving in cages while being poked and prodded with whatever scientists fancy. I think it is depressing and sort of grotesque that I am using products that have been tested on animals that are even commonly bred as our pets. So, I began my research to find out what companies still test on animals, why they do so, and what other alternatives they could use in place of animal testing.