Animal Rights

analytical Essay
2329 words
2329 words

Animals and man have shared this planet since humans first appeared on earth. Animals have provided transportation, food, clothing, shelter, companionship and entertainment throughout the ages. Therefore, it is our duty to treat animals with respect, care and kindness and not cause them undue suffering, because they have, in many ways, made it possible for man to survive on earth. However, because normal adult humans have superior mental abilities in the hierarchical scale in nature, animals have fewer rights than humans. Consequently, it is our responsibility to support and maintain the animal kingdom (to the best of our ability); therefore helping to preserve them as fellow members or our community of life on earth.

There are many differing opinions in the Animal Rights Community. For example, how are animal rights different from the rights of humans? Do we have a right to use animals for our benefit? Do we have a right to use animals for experimentation? Do all animals have equal rights? Do they suffer more at our hands than they would in their natural habitat? These are some of the questions that will be addressed in this paper, and they will be presented fairly.

Tom Regan thinks our treatment of animals is wrong and we are guilty of violating their rights. He is committed to several goals: “total dissolution of use of animals in science, the dissolution of commercial animal agriculture, and total elimination of commercial sport hunting and trapping.”

He maintains that our whole system is skewed because we view animals as our resource. We think traditional farming agriculture is acceptable but factory farming is not—a toxicity test on animals for cosmetics is wrong, but medical research for cancer is ...

... middle of paper ...

Orlans, F. Barbara. In The Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal

Experimentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Rachels, James. Created From Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism. Oxford University Press, 1991

Regan, Tom. "The Philosophy of Animal Rights"


Rolston III, Holmes and Andrew Light, eds. Environmental Ethics: An Anthology (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003)

Singer, Peter. "All Animals Are Equal" from TOM REGAN & PETER SINGER (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations, New Jersey, 1989, pp. 148-162


Warren, Mary Ann. "Rights of the Nonhuman World." Environmental Philosophy. Ed. Robert Elliot and Arran Gare. University Park: The State University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.

In this essay, the author

  • Analyzes how mary ann warren disagrees with regan and singers' strong animal rights position and thinks there is a reasonable way of dealing with animals of different kinds to vary in strength.
  • Explains warren, mary ann, "rights of the nonhuman world." environmental philosophy. ed. robert elliot and arran gare.
  • Argues that it is our duty to treat animals with respect, care, kindness, and not cause them undue suffering, since they have made it possible for man to survive on earth.
  • Analyzes tibor machan's view that animals have no rights and need no liberation, but callousness or cruelty shows disregard to life and is a character flaw.
  • Cites rolston iii, holmes, and andrew light, eds. environmental ethics: an anthology. singer, peter. "all animals are equal" from tom regan and peter singer.
Get Access