Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Do you think its ok to use animals for research
Do you think its ok to use animals for research
Essays on banning animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Do you think its ok to use animals for research
H.R ___
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Representative Julie-Ann Catungal introduced the following bill which we referred to the Committee on __________.
Animal Testing Bill
Section One:
This bill will set rules to any make-up company creating cosmetic products for humans. Companies who create the make-up must have the product tested on animals before testing on humans.
Section Two:
Congress hereby finds and declares that cosmetics has been flawed because of it’s lack of sufficient research. In order to fulfill an efficient research (synonym), cosmetic companies should undergo animal testing. Products created by the company should first go through animal research, if it does not cause problems it then shall be tested on humans. If the product does cause harm of the animals, then the product can not continue on.
Most animals are quite similar to humans, such as nice or monkeys. Mice are ninety-eight percent genetically similar to humans, which is why mice is the most commonly used animal used for scientific, medical, and cosmetic research. Without animal research we would not have found treatments for diabetes, anthrax, polio, and smallpox. People should not oppose to animal research due to the fact that products most people use on a day to day basis are tested on animals. Animal experiments have helped improve our medical research, introduced new medicines, and helped improve lives all over the world. Although, animals are used for experiments, research can help better the lives of the future animals. Animals research can help improve the scientific, medical, and cosmetic research for the future. With the help of animal research, we help better the lives of the future people and animals.
Animal t...
... middle of paper ...
...e problems it then shall be tested on humans. A law will be established where companies who create products such as medicine and cosmetics will need to test their products on animals before having it tested on humans. The bill would cost $16 Billion annually on animal testing. Bill should be enforced starting on January 01, 2015. Agency that will be in charge is the Occupational and Safety and Health Administration.
Works Cited
"Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? - ProCon.org."ProConorg Headlines. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Feb. 2014
"BENEFITS." Pro-Test: Standing up for Science. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Feb. 2014.
National Research Council (US) Committee to Update Science, Medicine, and AndAnimals.Safety Testing. U.S. National Library of Medicine, 18 Apr. 0000. Web. 14 Feb. 201
http://www.swaebr.org/Resources/When%20animals%20help%20animals.htm
The information that animals have provided scientists over the past decades has changed society, and is still changing society for the better. Millions of lives have been saved with the use of animal testing and many more will be saved with continued research. However, there are many who dismiss this monumental achievement completely and oppose the use of animals in laboratory research. Though many find this practice to be
There is a wealth of evidence showing that animal “models” are not accurate and cannot be relied upon for safety testing and disease research. Scientists and doctors recognize that while animals are biologically very similar to human beings, they are not identical.
SUMMARIZE: The article grants information on new models in cosmetics to take the place of animal experimentation. It goes on to talk about how the European Union has now banned using animal-based test for cosmetic reasoning. Pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies have been using computer-like tools to assess the toxicity it has for years. The author incorporates information on cosmetics and the outlook on further research. ‘According to experts, combination of laboratory-based with virtual work will be the future of testing and is progressing faster than they expected.” (87 words)
There has been some controversy regarding L’Oréal Canada and their use of animal testing in their cosmetic products. For certifications regarding safety, we currently possess 86% of manufacturing facilities that are either OHSAS 18001 or VPP certified. (L’Oréal Canada, 2014) Safety is a priority for us at L’Oréal Canada to ensure that our products are safe for our consumers so that they can enjoy the beauty of our cosmetic products. Health Canada has stated that science has not advanced to the point where they feel comfortable banning animal testing in the cosmetic industry, but that animal testing is not required for cosmetic products. (Bendall, 2011) However, the European Union has recently passed a Cosmetics Directive in 2009, which bans the use of animal testing in the cosmetic industry. The Cosmetics Directive bans the testing of finished products, ingredients within a product and the marketing of a product that has been tested on animals. (European Commission, 2014) As a result of these changes in Europe, it is important for L’Oréal Canada to consider alternative methods to animal testing for business to continue with countries in Europe, and so that consumers will feel more positive about purchasing our products due to them being cruelty-free.
Over 100 Million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in testing Labs every year. Animals are used to test the safety of products, advance scientific research, and develop models to study disease and to develop new medical treatments all for the sake of mankind. Animals should not be used for scientific research because animal testing is inhumane, other testing methods now exist, and animals are very different from human beings.
Why do we have to use animals for research? Many humans and animals get the same illnesses because animals are biologically similar to humans. Animals have a shorter life cycle than humans and as a result, they can be studied throughout their whole life span or across several generations. According to information from the Office of Technology Assessment, it is estimated that between 17 and 23 million animals are used in research each year. Approximately 95% of these animals are rats and mice specifically bred for research and 4.25% of these animals include rabbits, guinea pigs, sheep, fish, frogs, insects, and other species. Most importantly, only 0.75% of the animals in research are cats, dogs, and primates. Major medical advances have been made because of the research of these animals. (Animal Research 2013)
“Animals and Research Part 4: Ethics of using animals in research.” Editorial. Seattle Post-Intelligencer 20 Apr. 2000 <http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/anml4.shtml>.
Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.
The use of animals to test cosmetics is introduced in their article as well. The authors quote a vast amount of credible sources from prestigious universities such as Princeton and from well known animal rights group such as PETA. I will use this as my main source of information.
The entire human race benefits from animal research. “Without animal research, medical science would come to a total standstill”(O’Neil 210). It is not as if scientists and researchers just sit in their labs all day and torture animals for fun. Not to mention animal use is being reduced as much as possible, “most scientists are glad to use alternative tests because they are usually faster and cheaper than tests on animals”(Yount 72). However, “you cannot study kidney transplantation or diarrhea or high blood pressure on a computer screen”(O’Neil 212).
Throughout history, beginning as early as 500 BC, animals have been used to test products that will later be utilized by humans (“Animal Testing” 4), what isn’t publicly discussed is the way it will leave the animals after the process is done. Many innocent rabbits, monkeys, mice, and even popular pets such as dogs are harmed during the testing application of cosmetics, medicine, perfumes, and many other consumer products (Donaldson 2). Nevertheless, there are many people whom support the scandal because "it is a legal requirement to carry out animal testing to ensure they are safe and effective” for human benefit (Drayson). The overall question here is should it even be an authorized form of experimentation in the United States, or anywhere else? The fact of the matter is that there are alternatives to remove animals out of the equation for good (“Alternatives” 1). They are cheaper, and less invasive than the maltreatment of the 26 million innocent animals that are subjected to the heartlessness of testing each year (“Animal Testing” 4). All in all, due to the harsh effects of animal testing, it should be treated as animal cruelty in today’s society.
Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the necessity to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.
Simple household items such as lotions, shampoos and cosmetics aren’t very expensive and are within reach for the public, yet the public is not knowledgeable of the fact that the products that they use everyday are put through a series of tests which involve the use of harmless animals. Several large commercial companies do not make products for animals; they decide that using these harmless creatures for the testing of their products, could be cause to be harmful to animals still go forward with these types of procedures on an everyday basis. Although these animals are unable to defend themselves or signs of any form of consent for the near death procedures, these companies find this as a cheap solution for testing their products before placing them on the market. There are many other alternatives to testing animals such as embryonic stem cell research. Animal experimentation is wrong and it can be avoided but companies which are greedy for money chose not to.
...products on animals. The conflict is that even though the public is strongly against testing on animals, manufacturers are required by trade standards and consumer protection laws to show that their merchandise is not toxic and dangerous to public health, especially when it is in large quantities for shipping (“Testing Cosmetics on Animals” pars. 3).
It still comes as a surprise to me that with all the technology in today’s society, we are still relying on animals for cosmetic research. Some people think that it is acceptable and even justified to test on mere animals rather than risk hurting people. So, for these kinds of people, animal testing makes perfect sense. However, in my opinion, animals are living creatures and have the right to live out their lives as nature intended rather than simply surviving in cages while being poked and prodded with whatever scientists fancy. I think it is depressing and sort of grotesque that I am using products that have been tested on animals that are even commonly bred as our pets. So, I began my research to find out what companies still test on animals, why they do so, and what other alternatives they could use in place of animal testing.