Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The consequences of zoos for animals
Advantages of keeping animals in zoo
Why should animals be kept in a zoo
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The consequences of zoos for animals
I. living standards of animals and serve to entertain the human population. However, they serve little benefit to the animals themselves.
A. Many of us have been to the zoo a few times in our lifetime and seen animals for the very first time that we have never seen anywhere else.
a) We may justify zoos by stating that they teach us about different animals and allows us to view them up close.
b) However, animals in zoos don’t teach us much because they cannot act like they would in the wild within their enclosures. It’s far better to learn about animals in the wild, or watch TV shows about them.
B. Another argument against animals living on their own in the wild, is that animal populations can be preserved as long as they live in captivity under the protection of humans. While this is a common belief that many individuals share, in most cases this is not true.
a)
…show more content…
The lifespan of animals in captivity is far less than animals in the wild.
b) Most of the animals at zoos are not even endangered. Breeding in captivity is not the best way to help with conservation. Numerous zoos breed for the sole purpose of having a cute baby to attract the public.
(CONNECTIVE: It’s hard to imagine that the animals we get joy from seeing at the zoo, has a negative affect on the animals.
Considering the many challenges animals face in the wild, it is understandable that people may be eager to support zoos and may feel that they are protective facilities necessary for animal life. In the article “ Zoos Are Not Prisons. They Improve the Lives of Animals”, Author Robin Ganzert argues that Zoos are ethical institutions that enrich the lives of animals and ultimately protect them. Statistics have shown that animals held in captivity have limited utilitarian function resulting in cramped quarters, poor diets, depression, and early death for the animals thus, proving that Zoos are not ethical institutions that support and better the lives of animals as author Robin Ganzert stated (Cokal 491). Ganzert exposes the false premise in stating
The entertainment value does not contradict the morals of taking a wild animal and caging it, so we can stare at it for a few minutes. I will be honest, I love being able to take my kids to the zoo and aquarium. We enjoy walking around looking at all the exotic animals that cannot be seen while walking around the local park. The animal’s personalities and temperaments we see at the zoos is hardly the animal they would be in the wild. The visual education we are receiving is altered and therefore, false. Imagine you are put in a room very similar to your own, with your best friend or spouse, and you were told to behave ‘normally’. You can dance, laugh, talk, play, anything, but you will be watched by an estimated 5,000 people a day. No one would see the true you; the same goes for wild animals. We are able to have a better understanding of animals in their natural habitat rather than a miniature version filled with artificial objects in the local zoo or aquari...
Lastly, many zoos have breeding programs which helps endangered species grow their population. In the wild some animals find it hard to find a mate and to successfully breed. At zoos they have professionals which make sure that the breeding goes successfully and that the baby grows into a strong and healthy adult. If you still don't believe that animals should be kept in zoos another option is an animal sanctuary where animals are able to run free but still have the care of a human if
When people go on a trip to the zoo, it can be assumed that they do not think about much more than what they can see. Signals that make zoos unfair and sometimes unbearable for the captive animals are not visible to most spectators. This essay will explain how zoos are unjust and should not be supported. Animals should not be held captive due their negative behavioral changes, lack of natural habitat and the zoos failure to effectively preserve endangered species.
Animals can become depressed and lifeless when living in a zoo. They start showing unnatural behavior such as pacing and sleeping all the time.
There are many places where people can go to see live animals such as aquariums, zoos, and safari parks. A pleasant way to define a Zoo is to call it “an establishment that maintains a collection of wild animals”. (Google def) Another way to say that is a facility in which animals are “enclosed in cages for public exhibition”. I believe zoos are ethical; however, changes need to be made to eliminate problems I have discovered. In this argumentative essay, I will be arguing the ethics of zoos and certain problems that need to be addressed that people are not aware of. Zoos are great places to take the family out for the day to have entertainment; however, problems such as captive breeding, length of life, and animal stress need to improve.
Such that the zoo based research is minor in the greater efforts . However, this testimony is slowly being weakened due to the growth of zoo-based research for conservation purposes. Despite this most of the research is focused on animal husbandry rather than the imperative to advance conservation. The reason why there has been an increased in zoo-based research is the availability to carry out high-impact research on animals in in-situ may be too costly. Therefore, the justifiability for captivity is that they now withhold a more holistic requirement to promote species viability and ecosystem health.
Even though while in zoos they can have more stress being around people zoos will help the animals
The best zoos are shifting their focus to the animals’ emotional and psychological needs by providing mental challenges and stimuli to enrich the animals’ daily lives (Wilkens, 2016). This can therefore prevent the psychological issues that were present in many other animals in the past. Zookeepers are also putting in more effort into making animal enclosures as similar to their natural habitats as possible (Wilkens, 2016). Zoos aim to allow animals to have more room and have more control over their daily lives, which in turn can improve the health of the animal. Keeping animals in close proximity also allows scientists to study them better, and therefore enables them to make even further improvements, especially on the health and physical care of the animals (Kelly, 2016).
Zoos are public parks that claim to display animals for the purpose of education and procreation of endangered species; but in reality Zoos area actually doing more harm than good. Animals that live in zoos are more likely to suffer from illness or injury as opposed to those who live in the wild, and they also have shorter lifespans.
There is a tone of bad things about zoos. The conditions of zoos affect animals in many different ways. Most of the ways are negative . I’m going to explain why zoos are bad for animals and why we shouldn’t keep animals in the zoos. That includes the poor habitat, low diet, and not a normal breeding process.
If anything zoo’s teach kids not to respect other individuals and their freedom. Showing that it is ok to cage the animals is teaching kids to not respect the animals. Also while animals are in zoos and aquariums they tend act bizarre and unnatural so they act different than they would in their natural habitat, this paints a distorted picture of an animal’s behaviour and actions. This further proves that animals shouldn’t be forced into
Zoos display fascinating animals from all over the world for human entertainment, research, conservation, and education. Many scientists conduct studies on animals in captivity that they may not have been able to in the wild. Zoos educate all the visitors that come; they let people know everything that they know about the animals on display. We do learn a lot from these animals, but not all of the animals in the zoo are behaving like they normally would in the wild. Larger animals, such as elephants and orcas (commonly known as killer whales), have trouble with being confined in such a small area. However, many smaller animals benefit from zoos because they provide protection from predators, natural disasters, and poachers. They also benefit from conservation efforts; the babies being born get all the care they could ever need. Some animal rights activists are concerned that the conservation efforts are limiting the gene pool of the species. They argue that the small number of animals able to breed in captivity limits biodiversity and leads to weaknesses in the species overall. Zoos are wonderful places to study and learn about animals, but we need to improve the living standards for animals that struggle with captivity.
Furthermore, zoo animals are often exposed to chemicals, solvents and other toxic substances. Finally, it is common for visitors to tease and provoke caged animals. In conclusion, therefore, it is not true to say that zoos are educational or they help to protect endangered species.
... danger too. A good reason for captivity is rehabilitation for an animal that is hurt or wounded and could be treated. Then having a second chance back out into the wild. Also by keeping endangered species from going completely instinct by figuring out genetics of an animal. So having zoos and farms do help animals but does put them at risk.