Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is a multicultural society
How ethnicity is socially constructed
Religious conflicts today and their causes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is a multicultural society
In his analysis, Ethnic Conflict and Civil Society: India and Beyond, Ashutosh Varshney (2001) sets out to discover what the link between communication in multi-ethnic societies and ethnic conflict is. He lays out structural definitions of ethnic conflict and its counterparts, conducts comparative research of various religious communities in India, and effectively communicates his findings. This paper will identify Varshney’s main question that he bases his research upon, present his conclusions, determine his methods of research, and further analyze the importance and validity of his fieldwork. Because his findings strongly relate to course readings regarding structuralism, how various socioeconomic levels cause conflict, and the integral ties communities must have in order to avoid unrest, Varshney’s research is one that is both valid and commendable.
From the beginning, the reader is able to presume that Varshney (2001) is working towards solving a plethora of questions after analyzing his research. Determining the cause of ethnic conflict is no easy task, and one must approach it from a variety of perspectives. Varshney asks smaller, introductory questions such as: are interethnic or intraethnic relations more likely to cause conflict, how does the presence of violence and peace vary in civil societies, and how one may begin to define “ethnic”, “ethnic conflict”, and “civil societies.” However, when taking a step back and examining the drive behind his conclusions, Varshney’s main research question seems to be, “what role do civic organizations play in times of ethnic tensions, and how do the two correlate?” He later continues to use religious tension in India as his dependent variable to discuss several aspects of tension,...
... middle of paper ...
... the international community will allow the human race to take a step further towards a peaceful, coexisting environment.
Works Cited
1. Linz, Juan J., and Alfred C. Stepan. "2." Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1996. N. pag. Print.
2. Sasse, Gwendolyn. "Crimean Autonomy: A Viable Alternative to War?" Online Posting. The Washington Post. N.p., 3 Mar. 2014. Web. 3 Mar. 2014. .
3. Steiner, Jürg, and Markus M. L. Crepaz. European Democracies. 8th ed. New York: Pearson Longman, 2012. Print.
4. Varshney, Ashutosh. "Ethnic Conflict and Civil Society: India and Beyond." World Politics 53 (2001): 362-98. Project Muse. Apr. 2001. Web. .
1. Janda, Kenneth. The Challenge of Democracy. Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston, MA. 1999. (Chapter 3 & 4).
13. The Rise and Fall of Western Europe's Democratic Age, 1945-1973 Martin Conway Contemporary European History , Vol. 13, No. 1 (Feb., 2004) , pp. 67-88 Published by: Cambridge University Press
Fearon, James D., and David D. Laitin. "Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War." American Political Science Review 97, no. 01 (2003): 75. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000534.
(7) J.Habermas, "Three Normative Models of Democracy", in Constellation, Vol. I, No:1, 1994, p. 8
Vesnic-Alujevic, L. and Nacarino, R. C. 2012. The EU and its democratic deficit: problems and (possible) solutions. European View, 11 (1), pp. 63--70.
Thomassen, J. & Schmitt, H. 2004. Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union. Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning, 45 (2), pp. 377-410.
Svensson, I. (2007, December). Fighting with Faith: Religion and Conflict Resolution in Civil Wars. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 51, No. 6, pp 930-949. Sage Publication, Inc.
Zakaria, F. (2007). The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad (Revised Edition). New York: W. W. Norton.
India is the center of a very serious problem in the world today. It’s a very diverse place with people from many different religious backgrounds, who speak many different languages and come from many different regions. They are also separated economically. Two of the country’s religious sects, Muslims and Hindus, have been in conflict for hundreds of years. Their feelings of mistrust and hatred for each other are embedded in all those years and will not leave easily. What’s most disturbing is that there seems to be no plan for reconciliation available. There are numerous reasons for this conflict.
During the Cold War, many regional conflicts occurred and were noted as the significant battles which later led to decolonization. One of the regional conflicts were India and Pakistan fighting for their independence. In 1947, India was released under Great Britain’s control and gained its independence. However, the country was divided between Muslims and Hindus, which share different religions. Muslims wanted church and state to become unified while Hindus wanted a separation of these two establishments. Since these two ethnic groups disagreed, it was difficult to create a new government. Therefore, India was divided into two nations: India for the Hindus and Pakistan for the Muslims. Hindus and Muslims were racing to the border in order to get to their nation state which led to killing 500,000 people due to rioting. Although, Mohandas Gandhi, an Indian National Congressman, wanted to obtain peace between these two religions. Pakistan refused the H...
There is a distinct difference between popular Indian nationalism, that is the nation believing in a state independent of Britain, and Indian nationalist movements, for example the Muslim League or the Hindu revivalist movement. These movements fought for independence but were far more religiously orientated and were fighting in their own interests. Although Indian nationalism initially found expression in the Mutiny of 1857, its deve...
Samad, Omar. "Ethnic Politics: A dangerous Fault Line." Afghan Analytica (2013): n.pag. Web. 18 Nov 2013.
In late 1947, the newly created states of India and Pakistan went to war over the valley of Kashmir. A United Nations brokered ceasefire divided the state into Indian and Pakistani controlled territories, and resolved that a referendum would be held in which the people of Kashmir would be able to choose to join either country. The referendum has not been held to this day. India granted its portion of Kashmir a special status within its constitution, allowing for a great degree of self-autonomy. However, successive Kashmiri governments have been dissolved by the government of India, and elections have only been held in the presence of its armed forces. In 1965, Pakistan and India waged a second indecisive war over Kashmir. In the 1980s, resistance within Kashmir itself against the Indian government took on a violent nature, with guerilla attacks against Indian army bases. India responded with heavy army clampdowns, and since then the situation has only escalated and get worse. It is estimated that well over 34,000 people have died within the valley, and the relations between the two countries have become increasingly acrimonious. India blames Pakistan for the militant uprising, claiming Islamabad is supporting cross border terrorism. Pakistan responds that it merely provides diplomatic and moral support arguing, furthermore, that India’s history of human rights abuses in the valley is to blame. With both countries now in possession of nuclear arms; the recent war in KARGIL and the increasing number of civilian deaths, refugees, and other human rights issues within Kashmir, the conflict seems to be taking on a more serious nature. In this paper I will discuss the Kashmir conflict in some depth, examining the problem in...
Newton, K. & J. W. Van Deth (2005). Foundations of Comparative Politics: Democracies of the Modern World, Cambridge: CUP, Ch. 4, ‘Presidential and Parliamentary Government’, 60-71.
The causes of ethnic conflict cannot be generalised to fit all incidents, as the conflicts in Sri