Analyzing Heinrichs 'Ethos In Thank You For Arguing'

681 Words2 Pages

According to Heinrichs, his daughter had learned at a very early age “...that a good persuader doesn’t merely express her own emotions; she manipulates the feelings of her audience.” (Thank You For Arguing, page 81). From the beginning of his lessons on ethos, the author has made it very clear that during an argument, the persuader must focus all of his or her attention on the audience. Even though the goal appears to be for selfish purposes, persuaders must be selfless if they are to achieve what they set out to do.
According to Heinrichs, Aristotle decided that the best way to change people’s emotions was through their beliefs. Belief is a strange field in which emotions and rational are mixed in the world of rhetoric. (Note: the question asked what people’s rationale should be modified through but the book stated what people’s emotions should be modified through)
Heinrichs states that telling a …show more content…

Chances are that the effect of the gradual increase in volume will not work as well with a smaller audience. According to Heinrichs, logos and ethos are more effective on the smaller audiences.
When using emotion in a speech, the speech should not be enriched with complex vocabulary. Simplification from the emotional persuader appeals to the audience the greatest and conjures a greater reaction from the audience. The goal is to keep the audience from having to try to think too hard. Preventing the audience from thinking too hard allows more room for them to initiate exaggerated emotions.
Humor can be utilized in an argument as the best emotion since it is really handy at improving a persuader’s ethos. It makes the persuader look as if he or she has better things to do than stand around and commit himself or herself to an argument that is not worth their

Open Document