Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical media essay
Mass media critical essay
Problems with the media in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Analysis of Dave Chappelle's For What It's Worth Stand-Up Comedy Dave Chappelle’s stand-up comedy can be raunchy, grotesque, and
sometimes chillingly serious, but for the most part consistently funny
throughout. His newest routine being "For What It's Worth". In this
stand-up it seems that there are no objective boundaries for the
subject of his jokes, so long as the extremity of the subject raised
is outweighed by the comedy the joke provides. This not only allows
Chappelle to use offensive ideas in his routine, but to subtly express
concerns relating to inconsistencies and inadequacies among the
American media, justice system, and government.
It is quite observable in "For what It's Worth" that as an
African-American man living in the United States, Dave Chappelle has
reservations about some particular things existing in his culture.
The first concern he raises neatly intertwined in a joke is that of a
negative bias American police hold about African-American men. This
bias pertains to the subject of the police being very erroneous in
their practice of detaining offenders
when the suspect is black. Chappelle jokingly states that before he
goes out at night he checks his police scanner to take precaution of
the injustice, only to hear "Calling all cars, calling all cars, be on
the look-out for a black male between 4'7'', and 6'8''." This
punchline allows Chappelle to casually raise a serious concern about
law enforcement in the United States. The concern relates to the
unjust detainment of African-American men who might happen to be at
the wrong place a...
... middle of paper ...
...stem. Chappelle
feels that if a fifteen year-old cannot be held responsible for the
decision of whether or not they want to be peed on, then how can they
be treated as an adult and be held responsible for an action that
would be them life in prison.
Throughout Chappelle's stand-up routine, an array of subjects arises.
Although some of the topics are purely for the comedy, others show
serious concern yet are still raised in the form of a joke. Because
Chappelle is able to raise these concerns as a joke, it is much more
intriguing and effective. This also allows him to touch base with an
audience who otherwise may never be exposed to the subjects, which he
talks about. It is very meaningful to see Chappelle use his
celebrity status in a positive way.
WORKS CITED
Chappelle, Dave. “For What It’s Worth”
They must have felt foolish, as if they were the brunt of an elaborate joke. You could tell by their facial expressions. The audience was a substitute for a larger target, which is the white supremacists and racists of the world. Chappelle is saying through humor that they along with their false beliefs are ludicrous, ignorant, gullible, and deserve to be made fun of. Another target is the news media. Wallace recorded Bigsby’s ludicrous message. Book publishers are a target. They’re not very discerning. They published Bigsby’s books. Minorities and homosexuals are targets as well. Interracial marriage is a target. A female White supremacist is married to Black White supremacist, and she is the one who gets divorced. Bigsby, after accepting his own ethnicity, accuses his wife of being a “nigger lover”, but he’s the
In Jim Collins book Good to Great, we explore the notion of being rigorous, not ruthless. “To be ruthless means hacking and cutting, especially in difficult times, or wantonly firing people without any thoughtful consideration.” (GTG, p. 52) In stark contrast, rigorous companies are no walk in the park, but the difference between the two styles is night and day. Rigorous companies adopt a top down approach when it comes to hiring management. There is an old saying that says a “fish rots from the head down.” This is analogous to a business hiring the wrong leadership and the business failing as a result of the poor hiring decisions in leadership. I think that successful companies, especially moving forward will
and set on fire. It is complete rubbish, designed to strengthen his ethos as a comedian and make him the
It was hilarious whenever Fred Sanford of the hit series Sanford and Son used to fake his heart attack saying that famous phrase, “I’m coming Elizabeth” or what about him telling Aunt Ester how ugly she was. No one took that type of comedy to the heart and it was intended to hurt no one. It was all for a laugh. Now in today’s time there are new shows on television such as The Chapelle Show, which is hosted and directed by the comedian Dave Chapelle. The object of this show seems to be how much fun he can make of a different race. Times have changed and so have peoples’ since of humor. People went from the laid-back type sitcoms such as Sanford and Son, The Three Stooges, and The Little Rascals, which are all types of shows that people can watch with their entire family, to shows even adults feel turned away from. Some examples include The Chapelle Show and In Living Color.
From these comedians, satirical humor expresses some opinions about political acts so people can view them more critically.
Steve Almond’s “Funny is the New Deep” talks of the role that comedy has in our current society, and most certainly, it plays a huge role here. Namely, through what Almond [Aristotle?] calls the “comic impulse”, we as a people can speak of topics that would otherwise make many of uncomfortable. Almond deems the comic impulse as the most surefire way to keep heavy situations from becoming too foreboding. The comic impulse itself stems from our ability and unconscious need to defend and thus contend with the feeling of tragedy. As such, instead of rather forcing out humor, he implies that humor is something that is not consciously forced out from an author, but instead is more of a subconscious entity, coming out on its own. Almond emphasizes
During the 2004 NAACP awards ceremony at Washington, D.C., in commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the landmark case Brown vs. Board of Education , Bill Cosby delivers a speech, which would be subsequently referred to as “The Pound Cake Speech, criticizing the lifestyle and lack of parenting in the African–American community. The speech has been severely criticized for it is delivery and topics expressed within it. Author Jerome Corsi notes, "Cosby was attacked both for his flippant tone and because his argument appeared to 'blame the victim' for the racial inequality and racial injustice suffered." The purpose of this essay is to examine why the use of comedy, partitioning of listeners, and scapegoating of African-American parents, as the sole cause of African-American social problems, lead to the poor reception of Cosby's speech.
Americans function in a normative society, where outliers are either considered dangerous or laughable. The patriarchal ideals upon which the United States was founded placed white heterosexual males at the top of the social ladder, but in so doing, all those who fall short of this specific condition are left struggling to climb toward normalcy. This ideal, however, is challenged by the blithely offensive, obsessive-compulsive main character of the film, As Good as it Gets. It is difficult to imagine an actor besides Jack Nicholson playing the part of Melvin Udall, whose neurotic behavior is a part of his particular brand of charm. Noted film critic, Roger Ebert, gave the film a three-star rating, stating that, “It is some kind of twisted tribute to Nicholson that he’s able to use this dialogue in what is, after all, a comedy.” Melvin casually insults everyone with whom he comes into contact, his interactions with people limited to remarks that are purposely hurtful and derogatory. But he gets away with it because that is the nature of American film comedy. Comedies allow audiences to laugh at what makes them uncomfortable, offering them a way to deal with recognizable social anxieties (Belton 164). Melvin exposes these anxieties with every jab and jibe he makes, each a commentary on the theme of race, class, sexuality, and gender.
control over their fate in which ends up in pleasurable experience. There is a degree of
A few examples of his humor on political issues, or as in the immediately following, his humor of the general basis of what he believes the rules his opponents, liberals, live by: The 14 Commandments of the Religious Left. A few examples (just so you can get a taste of what I am talking about) are:
... immensity of its horror finally makes him drop the pretense of knowing detachment he has held for so long. As he drunkenly sobs, “What’s funny? What’s so goddamned funny? I don’t get it” (Ch. 2, 23) his lurking humanity becomes evident. The subtly of interplay between The Comedian’s persona, his humanity, and even his hypocrisy strongly support his status as a living person alongside Dr. Manhattan.
The shows play a major role in developing the comedic basis for African American entertainers even today. As referred to in the modern day, “Black Comedy” is extremely favored by the populus. Famous black comedian Dave Chappelle, once played a role as a “racial pixie”. Chappelle performed as an oddly dressed pixie on the shoulders of African Americans and sang, danced, and encouraged the individual to give into the stereotypes of society (4).
their tongues. They watch for fun. Dimes fall from their palms to pay for the
In a satirical excerpt from a book by Mike Nichols, he is comparing the serpent from the bible story of Adam and Eve to a press secretary. In Genesis 2 and 3, we are told the story of how Eve was created from the rib of Adam, and that Adam and Eve were told by God that they can eat from any tree in the garden except the Tree of Knowledge. A “smooth-talking serpent” comes in and persuades Eve to eat the fruit from the forbidden tree. Nichols makes this comparison to give a humorous perspective to this biblical story. He also gives Adam the job title of the head gardener of Eden who has surgery to remove a rib,creating Eve. By doing this, his readers may be able to better understand the story by relating it in a situation of today’s society.
The nature of comedy has always left it somewhat resistant to critical analysis, and to some extent the same can be said for comedic actors. The class-clowns of Hollywood like Will Ferrell are often times constructed as being nothing more than amusing, so they seem like a simple case study.... ... middle of paper ... ...