Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

1445 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: College athletes should not be paid

Billions and billions of dollars going... where? The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) makes almost 11 billion dollars a year from college athletics but where does that money go? Well, the money for sure does not end up in the hands of these collegiate student-athletes, those men, and women who make them all that money in the first place. These billionaires want all the money for themselves. They are selfish. They are self-centered. They are money-hungry. They are part of the problem with college athletics. They are scared to lose just a small portion of this exorbitant pile of riches that they make to pay these hard working, devoted athletes. How could this problem be solved? You should be 100 percent sure of what you would do …show more content…

These students put in everything they got just to go into corruption afterward… does that sound right? If you think that it is their choice to not go into bankruptcy, think again because they got no education which leads to a lack of a good job and then they go bankrupt because they were not given any money to kick start their lives after the college sport they played. According to this video on twelve pros and cons on why college athletes should be or should not be paid. Many college athletes will not go pro even if they go to a division one school. Basically saying, where will they be after the fact? That is where the money would come in, it would provide these athletes with at least some shelter or anything before they start a job they like. The video clearly states that many of these athletes and students get hurt while getting a scholarship. This is a huge factor. If they were to accept a scholarship to attend a college and they got hurt it would not be good what so ever. Not only because he or she got hurt but they would have to pay for the injury, the college would never back them up with any money because they are too scared to spend a couple thousand out of the millions they have. Then again, these people in these colleges are gold diggers all they want is money, they will drop your scholarship and say goodbye to your …show more content…

You could think that… but this is not true whatsoever, because if they are working on their sport for 7 hours a day and 43 hours a month. So how in the world can they not miss a big chunk of class time? Exactly it doesn't make sense to say that these students get a lot of work done or they are in class a majority of the time. Aside from this, you may be thinking that the NCAA spends most of that 11 billion dollars on good things. But the only thing about that is how can they spend 11 billion dollars and not give a single penny to any college athlete who put themselves on the line to make them that money. Even though the NCAA needs maybe a small portion of that money all of these college athletes should get rewarded with some type of payment that has more than just emotion. Some sources might say that these student athletes can control whether or not they go bankrupt after college sports. This could be true, but how are they supposed to do that with no education and money to start an afterlife. Exactly it does not make sense for them not to get some money to start a career afterward or even just to have at least some money in their hands. You can think what you want about these hard working devoted athletes but you should be for sure that they should get paid for what they do. There is no argument anymore these athletes must be paid no matter

Show More
Related

  • Annotated Bibliography: Should College Athletes Be Paid?

    705 Words  | 2 Pages

    Critics feel that the term amateurism is only a term used in collegiate sports to show the distinguish the difference between professional and collegiate so that they don’t have to pay college athletes. College athletes are just as talented and just as exposed as professional athletes. The argument is for there to be a share in the profits for wage compensation amongst players is know as pay-for-play. College athletics is a corporate enterprise that is worth millions of dollars in revenue. Pay-for-play is an assumption that colleges and universities receive huge revenues from marketing their collegiate sports programs and that the profits from these revenues are not shared with players who perform in the arena. Which some feel that they should.

    Read More

  • Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

    767 Words  | 2 Pages

    Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.

    Read More

  • The NCAA and College Athlete

    983 Words  | 2 Pages

    The NCAA is guiding them in directions to make money for everybody while doing everything possible to keep the players out of the money. College athletes deserve profit because they bring in large revenue into their program and the NCAA, and they invest tons of time into their sport. The athletes at these institutions bring in tons of money into their school every year and deserve compensation. These universities are exploiting these athletes by not giving them back what they make for their school. The numbers say it all when it comes to the scamming of the athletes by their own schools.

    Read More

  • College Athletes Should Be Paid

    923 Words  | 2 Pages

    Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama University makes $123,769,841 in total revenue from sports. (College Athletics Revenue) Yes ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY THREE MILLION. Yet an athlete from Alabama can only receive benefits from a scholarship.. That doesn’t seem right. You would want to be payed when the opportunity arises. It should only be fair these players get a piece of the revenue pie, after all they are the ones creating the revenue. The players should be getting benefits to allow them to pay for basic college needs, grow up to be responsible adults, and allow the NCAA to thrive. This would allow for the NCAA to truly thrive as a sporting association.

    Read More

  • Why College Athletes Shouldn't Get Paid

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    Paying College athletes has been a trending topic around the National Collegiate Athletic Association over the years. Many have strong opinions about this topic, and the opinions vary. The discussion of paying college athletes began in 1991 when the famed Fab Five became a household name in the United States. The Fab Five is arguably the greatest recruiting class of all time; all attending the same school (Baxter). The Fab Five first created controversy when they started to question why the university and university officials were making millions and millions of dollars off their names, and they were just deprived hungry college kids not making a dime. Nike even made billions by copyrighting their famed black athletic socks, black athletic shoes, and baggy shorts that they made famous throughout the nation. The question over the past several years has become a general and trending topic of argument. College athletes should not be paid for their performance or to perform for their universities because they are there for an education, questions will be asked, and universities would not make as big of an income off the games.

    Read More

  • Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

    1336 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many sports people say that if the NCAA pays the athletes to play, it will encourage them to stay in school longer. The money that the athletes will receive at the next level will be bigger than any amount the NCAA can afford to pay them. Athletes argue that the NCAA and ESPN are making billions of dollars off of them to air their games; why can’t they get compensation for it. This argument is valid, but no matter what amount, free education is far more valuable than any financial amount. You’re talking about giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to

    Read More

  • Analysis Of College Athletes Be Paid

    1152 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Big time athletes do get paid. They get free college tuition.”(Posnanski). College athletes not only get tuition, but they also get room, board, and meals. They also get to be coached by top coaches, train in the best training facilities, travel around the country for free, be treated by the best doctors and medicine, and have their chance in the spotlight (Posnanski). With universities constantly raising tuition prices, having free tuition is a big thing, but most, if not all, athletes waste that by focusing just on their sport. The athletes themselves probably aren’t the only ones to blame. Practices should be cut shorter to allow the students’ time to study more and actually get a college education. While you hear many athletes complaining that they don’t have personal spending money, other college students can say the same thing. While athletes are practicing, others are working to pay off tuition fees, which the athletes get free. In an interview at his trial against the NCAA Ed O’Bannon, a former basketball player from UCLA, said “I was an athlete masquerading as a student. I was there strictly to play basketball. I did basically the minimum to make sure I kept my eligibility academically so I could continue to play.” (Dahlberg). People should be going to college for what it is meant for—education, not sports. College sports are an extracurricular activity that should be

    Read More

  • Should College Athletes be Paid?

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    Colleges make a plethora of money off of the sports teams and the players do not see any of that money at all but if they do then their performance would be poor on the field and off the field as well. According to Fred Bowen, “only football and men’s basketball are money-making college sports. Most others, such as field hockey, wrestling and swimming, do not attract big crowds or make big bucks.” (Should college athletes get paid?). Also the sports team that give out the most money for athletes to come and play for them, are football and men’s basketball. “Critics of paying college athletes note that only a small number of them compete in sports or on teams that actually generate revenue. They argue that if players were paid, a handful of exceptional athletes would receive large salaries while most players would receive a pittance, and would probably no longer be offered valuable athletic scholarships” (Paying College Athletes). It is not a surprise to anyone that the main athletes that do want to be paid is football and basketball players. They want to be paid because they bring in all of the money for the school and the...

    Read More

  • Student Athletes Should Get Paid

    824 Words  | 2 Pages

    Coaches like Nick Saban, Les Miles, and John Calipari have contracts that exceed over $50 Million. So again the schools are receiving billions, the coaches are receiving millions, and the players are receiving a so called “free education” but they still have to pay for food, housing, and doctor bills. Now I know a lot of the argument will be when they go be a professional athlete they will be able to pay it all back. While some of this is true the probability for a student athlete to turn pro is about 2%. So out of the hundreds of thousands of student athletes in the country only 2% of them will actually make it into the professional sports world. So they will have to use their education to find a job in a bad

    Read More

  • College Athletes Deserve to Be Paid

    1523 Words  | 4 Pages

    College athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!

    Read More

  • Essay Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

    557 Words  | 2 Pages

    College athletes should not be paid it will ruin college sports forever. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid by the school because of all of the hard work they put in however they shouldn’t be paid because there is no fair way to pay every college athlete. There are many reasons that college athletes shouldn’t be paid one of the main reasons is that colleges don’t have enough money, the second reason is that they already get money in the form of scholarships, and there is no fair way to pay each college athlete.

    Read More

  • Should Student-Athletes Be Paid?

    1960 Words  | 4 Pages

    College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.

    Read More

  • Why College Athletes Should NOT be Paid

    1764 Words  | 4 Pages

    The proposal of payment toNCAA student-athletes has begun major conversations and arguments nationwide with people expressing their take on it. “This tension has been going on for years. It has gotten greater now because the magnitude of dollars has gotten really large” (NCAA). I am a student athlete at Nicholls State University and at first thought, I thought it would be a good idea to be able to be paid as a student-athlete.After much research however; I have come to many conclusions why the payment of athletes should not take place at the collegiate level.The payment of athletes is only for athletes at the professional level. They are experts at what they do whether it is Major League Baseball, Pro Basketball, Professional Football, or any other professional sport and they work for that franchise or company as an employee. The payment of NCAA college athletes will deteriorate the value of school to athletes, create contract disputes at both the college and professional level, kill recruiting of athletes, cause chaos over the payment of one sport versus another, and it will alter the principles set by the NCAA’s founder Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. Under Roosevelt and NCAA, athletes were put under the term of a “student-athlete” as an amateur. All student athletes who sign the NCAA papers to play college athletics agree to compete as an amateur athlete. The definition of an amateur is a person who “engages in a sport, study, or other activity for pleasure rather than for financial benefit or professional reasons” (Dictonary.com).

    Read More

  • The NCAA and College Athletes: Should College Athletes Be Paid?

    1202 Words  | 3 Pages

    College athletes juggle busy academic and practice schedules all throughout their stressful weeks, so why shouldn't they be compensated for their time dedicated to sports? NCAA rules strictly prohibits players from being paid for all the hard work they do to protect “amateurism”, but are you really an amateur putting in over 40 hours a week between practice and other activities? Although students earn a college scholarship, that doesn’t cover living expenses, and access to a degree at the end of their career, players should be paid because schools, coaching staffs and major corporations are profiting off their free labor.

    Read More

  • College Athletes Should Be Paid

    1602 Words  | 4 Pages

    Some people say that college athletes get paid by having a scholarship, but if you look at it a different way, scholarships might change your mind. Coaches try to get players who they think have the talent to make them win and to persuade them to come to their school by offering them scholarships. The whole idea behind a scholarship is to lure the athlete into coming to your school. Scholarships are nothing more than a recruitment tactic. They will give you a scholarship as long as you produce for them. It’s all about what you can do for them. Indeed these scholarships pay for tuition, room and board, and books, but these athletes don’t have money for other necessities. The NCAA doesn’t want friends or boosters to offer athletes jobs because they ...

    Read More

More about Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Open Document