The first article that I read was “Work Pressure Demands more Downtime than a Fleeting Week Off.” It was a very interesting take on how the world that we live in can become a place of pressure and breakdowns. The workplace and the home place no longer exist. The people that this study was conducted on became a product of their work and could no longer separate themselves from it. According to “Work Pressure Demands more Downtime,” “A 13-year study of four cohorts of investment bankers illustrates the long-term costs of ignoring our bodies’ need for respite … Around year four, they started to break down from overwork. Eating disorders, tics, sleep disturbances, anxiety and depression were commonplace. Most of them responded by pushing harder …show more content…
I think the idea of quotas is a very valid point. There needs to be something legally binding that will force companies to step up their game and become a more diverse workplace. I think it is sad that it has come to the point where ideas like this are being forced onto companies, though. According to “Gender Quotas feel Coercive but Appear to Work,” “[Deborah Hargreaves, founding director of the High Pay Centre] started off thinking that quotas weren’t the answer, but the pace of change [in the UK] is glacial,” she says. “Every board thinks that when it’s got one woman, that’s it.” This allowed me to reflect on what type of workforce I will be entering into as a woman in the next few years. I would like to live in a world where my rights and my capabilities as a woman are not questioned. Imagine a world where the topic of a woman making it to a high managerial position isn’t even news because it has become the norm, and it is just a part of society. That is the world I want to live in. An interesting quote in the article was “One German government minister has compared the forthcoming shake-up of German corporate culture to “swallowing a toad” (“Gender Quotas feel Coercive but Appear to Work”). I reflect on this thought and wonder what will be the designated moment or movement which will allow women to be truly equal in the workplace. In my opinion, quotas are only the first step. It is a milestone for women to be represented on boards or in a management position. However, just because they are present does not mean that they will be listened to, taken seriously, or
Unfortunately, even today, women are still trying to prove themselves equal to men in many ways. The “glass ceiling” is perhaps one of the most familiar and evocative metaphors to surface from the 20th century. This expression has been used widely in the popular media as well as in official government reports. The image suggest that although it may be the case now that women are able to get through the front door professional hierarchies, at some point they hit an invisible barrier that blocks any further upward movement. “Below this barrier, women are able to get promoted; beyond this barrier, they are not”. Such a situation can be considered a limiting case for a more general phenomenon: situations in which the disadvantages women face relative to men strengthen as they move up executive hierarches. “Traditional approaches to recruitment, organization and job design, performance management and promotions are often designed in ways that are more suited to men than to women. This is what creates the glass ceiling”. Beyond the limit of job titles, the glass ceiling also creates a pay difference between men and women performing the same work requirements.
It has been proven that even by creating equal employment laws, one cannot ensure that woman will be treated fairly when being employed, especially in business. This equal treatment will not occur until enough men in power give the qualified women a chance to hold these positions. The business world will realize that women are capable of working alongside and over men in the business world.
While women were able to gain access to this highly male dominated profession, and in some cases they outnumber their male counterparts, researchers agree that women are still facing discriminatory barriers. While discrimination is more subtle nowadays compared to the blatant and stupid style of the recent past (Adcock, 2006) women are still experiencing discrimination which is preventing them from receiving equal pay, thus hindering their progress and altering their career paths. They still face an array of barriers to achieving equality in their careers, including the allocation of work, opportunities for advancement, income differentials...
The issues that I have with the reading is that its seems like not only is there government legislation that organizations need to consider during the hiring process but the organizations themselves have made the whole hiring process unnatural. I cannot express how many times I have heard individual’s express and somewhat joke that the reason why they were hired by their organization was due to the fact that a quota needed to be met. I think people should feel like they were hired based on their skills and what they have to offer to that particular organization, instead of being a part of a quota being filled. I learned that human resources departments often hire individuals that only fit the organization’s culture. What this means to me is that race is not always the issue but the culture of the person is judge more and analyzed to
The institutionalized discrimination of women in the work place is nothing new or unheard of. The brunt of it has happened fairly recently as women began to enter the labor market in force less than a century ago. The affect of this discrimination has had long lasting, generation spanning affects, but as time has passed and feminism spread, the gender-gap has slowly begun to shrink.
People want to be hired and work for companies where they know their skills are needed and they feel important. They do not want to be hired based on their gender, race or ethnicity. When an organization increases their diversity, they are able to enhance positive effects within their job. Diversity never needs to be looked at in a negative way, because no one wants to be put in a group just to meet a quota. People want to be put inside of groups because others want to include them and they feel their peers will respect their differences. When employees are not included they feel dissatisfied with their job which leads to conflict, miscommunication and eventually leads to
Stress by definition is an interaction between individuals and any source of demand (stressor) within their environment. Employment can be an exciting challenge for many individuals; it can also be a tremendous source of stress. (Long, Bonita C.) Stress in the work place can cause many individuals harm emotionally and physically. Several reasons for the intense amounts of stress are; too many demands from co-workers, supervisors constantly breathing down your back, elevated noise levels in the work place, lack of knowledge for a particular position, co-workers not upholding their responsibility to help with the task at hand, and favoritism. Lack of promotional opportunities at your place of employment, in spite of the fact that you go that extra mile will contribute to stress.
...start paying attention to their equality data, it may help them find ways to make their company more impartial and egalitarian. This would be a simple step for employers to take; yet they do not take it. To further gender equality and fairness, we must have equal representation in work. However, women are still not being represented enough in the workplace.
Equal pay for equal work is an outdated and reductive artifact of the feminist movement which fails to acknowledge extraordinary workers, take advantage of physiological and socioemotional differences in the sexes, and promotes an enslaving and socialist ideal that values labor over results. We should, therefore, abandon it. Businesses should award salaries based solely on merit without regard to gender or other factors, even if a gender bias should emerge as a result.
The Copé-Zimmermann legislation strictly speaking does not provide for a compulsory quota of 40% of women in French companies, but rather for a representation of at least 40% of each gender (art. L. 225-18-1 C.com regarding the board of directors, L. 225-69-1 and L. 226-4-1 C.com regarding the supervisory board of a two-tier management structure). However, it is apparent from the preparatory works that specifically women are targeted. Some have expressed their regret regarding the 40% threshold and would have preferred a complete equality with a threshold of 50% . It is true that the initi...
Sexism is a major factor in the workforce.Today male and female have a hard time breaking into the opposite gender dominated fields. This has happened because of the media, it has showed us that male have certain “right” jobs, as well as female. Female still dominate traditional female professions like cosmetology jobs are 92.9 percent women working them(Wolfe). If a man were to get into cosmetology they would most likely be judged for having that job, because we stereotype that they can't have a feminine job. Women have a harder time getting into high level positions. “Women make up only 21 of the S&P’s 500 CEOs,” (Berman). This has happened because the media has set in place stereotypes that it is wrong for women to have high level positions. It is getting better, in 2013 women chief financial officers increased 35 percent at large U.S. companies from 2012 (Frier and Hymowitz). The job market for men and women is still unfair but it is starting to get equal.
For many decades, women have faced inequalities in the workforce. At one point, they were not allowed to work at all. Although women's rights have improved and are now able to work alongside men, they are still treated unfairly. According to the 2012 U.S. Census, women’s earnings were “76.5 percent of men’s” (1). In 2012, men, on average, earned $47,398 and women earned only $35,791. This is when comparing employees where both gender spend the same amount of time working. Not only do women encounter unfairness in work pay, they also face a “glass ceiling” on a promotional basis. This glass ceiling is a “promotion barrier that prevents woman’s upward ability” (2). For example, if a woman is able to enter a job traditionally for men, she will still not receive the same pay or experience the same increase in occupational ability. Gender typing plays a huge role in the workplace. It is the idea that women tend to hold jobs that are low paid with low status. Women are not highly considered in leadership positions because of social construction of gender. Society has given women the role of “caretakers” and sensitive individuals. Therefore, women are not depicted as authoritative figures, which is apparent with the absence of women in leadership roles in companies. Furthermore, sex segregation leads to occupations with either the emphasis of women in a certain job or men in a certain job. In 2009, occupations with the highest proportion of women included “secretary, child care worker, hair dresser, cashier, bookkeeper, etc.” (3). Male workers typically held job positions as construction workers, truck drivers, taxi drivers, etc. (3). Sex segregation represents inequality because the gender composition for these jobs depends on what ...
As a result, the only logical solution to the problem would be to give women equal pay as men. This clearly would mean that women are being given higher up positions in the corporate setting. It is troubling to think that this issue has continued to go unsolved in the twenty-first century. What is even more alarming, is that there would be no negative repercussions to ending the wage gap. The wage gap is completely unfair and has clearly given working women a disadvantage in the workplace. This solution would help working women in society because they would finally feel equal to men in the workplace. If we keep allowing this to happen, it will only hinder the progress of other women’s and other progressive issues. It is time to end the stigma on working women in our society by ending the women’s wage gap once and for
I understand that the lack of women taking a role as a leader in a company does not apply as a good example speaking that it is gender inequality but based on the ability of the person of taking the job. But on the other hand, there is no reason that could explain why women are getting less pay than men when they both are working for the same job.Which also mean that there is no rejection stating that there is gender inequality when it comes together speaking of the wage gap between men and women. Restating the argument that was made earlier, women earn 77 percent of what men earn for the same job. In this case, it explains that gender inequality is still occurring around us. It clearly demonstrates that men and women are getting treated differently. If both men and women are taking the same job and working at the same hour and having the same experience. What makes that women should take a lower pay than men when women are also giving all those hard work in the same job? The only answer to that question is that there is gender inequality. There are also other examples of gender inequality that occur around the world. For instance, in Saudi Arabia there is limited mobility for women. Where women have no right to drive a car or ride a bicycle on public roads. Also in Chile and Lesotho, women lack the right to own land. All deeds must include the name of a man, the husband or father, and if one of those man die,
Late 1980's: work stress received increasing attention in I/O research, theory, and practice Balancing work and family lives received increasing attention.