Analysis Of Wiseblood By Flannery O Connor

955 Words2 Pages

While Flannery O’Connor’s Wiseblood is a story of religion, it is also a story of violence. Self-mutilation, graphic expletives, and emotional violence pepper the novel. When weaving together these two narratives of brutality and belief, a new story emerges, one that explores the relationship between religion’s social power and violence. The social power of Christianity, which can be understood as the ability to exert influence over the thoughts, beliefs, and actions of individuals and society, is widely known and well established. Yet, violence complicates religion. Violence can become a way of demonstrating power that erodes and problematizes church doctrine. Violence undermines the social power of the church by concretizing the intangible …show more content…

In the statement, which was explained in the previous paragraph, that the conscience is a “place where Jesus had redeemed you” (O’Connor 166), the word “you” is the object, and the conscience is a realm controlled by Christ. These subject and objects differ from those in the counsel given by Motes. He advises the audience member about what to do with an existing conscience, preaching “you had best… kill it” (O’Connor 166). The conscience, which was once a place, is now an object in Motes’s eyes. The word “it” is the object of the verb “kill”. The “you”, the audience member he is addressing, is the subject of the phrase; he is the one that Hazel thinks should be doing the killing. “You” becomes the subject of the second statement phrase rather than the object of the first one. The “you”, the person that Motes is addressing, can actively change the conscience by killing it, rather than having the conscience be a place where Jesus changes the individual through redemption. Now, the“you”, the regular person, decides the fate of their own conscience: death. Killing—violent, active, and definitive—establishes clear-cut roles of powerless victim and powerful perpetrator. The act of killing claims agency and thus control over one’s conscience. The traditional religious relationship, in which a higher power dictates the beliefs and conceptions of the individual, is changed. The suggestion to kill completely disregards any human concern about reverence or redemption. By allowing people to destroy and thus claim control of the place that was thought to be Jesus’s domain, violence diminishes people’s deference towards the divine. Permitting people to wield authority over places that were thought to be divinely controlled challenges the belief that Christ is all-powerful and worthy of admiration. Violence allows for a reversal of power between the divine and human. The

Open Document