Who should take blame, the students or their professor? Students should accept their own responsibilities and be held accountable for their own failures. If a student believes that the professor has made an error, then bring it to the professors' attention and ask why. If the answer then is not justified, take the next step up for a second opinion. Even then the students would start swarming over the idea of receiving a better grade, even though they did not deserve it.
What is causing harm to students more so than grades is the growing cost of higher education and the demand for colligate degrees. To pay for college students are offsetting the cost by taking out both private and government student loans. The answer of course would be to have student not take out loans and instead seek out scholarships. However, scholarships are becoming more competitive. Which again stresses out high school students because of the pressure to get these scholarships.
Some students want to get ahead of others no matter what the cost. They feel pressure to get good grades, and go to a good college from their parents, but they don’t want to take the time to study. Technology has made cheating worse in this aspect because students would rather spend time on their computers and game devices rather than study for exams. A lot of college students claim to cheat because they have issues going on in their personal lives; such as, working full time to pay for school or playing sports for the school. I think the biggest reason students cheat is because teachers h... ... middle of paper ... ...eat.
In theory, a student that works hard will receive the same grade as a student that does no work at all. This can potentially cause a high amount of students to refuse work and can result in a lower grade average among the students. This is turn will have a negative effect on the University’s economy. Large amounts of uneducated students also have the potential to damage the workforce after University and create a domino effect that damages the entire economy. Although not an ideal solution, an increase in tuition can encourage students to increase their effort and improve their
Grade Inflation Helps In “Stop Giving In To Higher Grades: Ten suggestions On How to Fight Grade Inflation,” the author Kevin C. Costley explains why grade inflation should be strictly decreased and how faculties should act to actually reduce it through providing a good number of citations and his own solutions. Nowadays, not only students and parents but even principals expect higher grade and this kind of problem extensively prevails in the United States. Universities also acknowledge that if the students get poor grades, they will transfer to another institute that retains a more generous grading standard, which eventually leads to imposing pressure on professors. If the students’ grades are inflated, they will not receive the chance to
Education should offer a reality check so that they are ready to build on what they actually do well and master what they do not. Instead of ripping the bandage off, a grading curve can be seen as a safety net for current college students. Is it necessary to cushion a student’s fall? Although every student should strive to earn an A, grading curves should not be allowed in schools because it affects the students’ capability to work harder, focus, and take their own classes more seriously. In high school, almost all of the teachers use grading on the curve.
The greatest effect of being graded happens to the individual. Farber asks, “Did you need grades to learn how to drive?” We have become “grade junkies.” Without the grades students can’t learn (333). Vogel agrees that students believe grades are the motivating factor in learning, but only for the money. Students want the grades because high GPA’s equal high paying jobs (338-339). Another negative effect of grades is that students want the best grade with the least amount of learning but this causes conflict with professors because the professor’s goal is different compared to the student’s (339).
Because it means owing that same money back and it can cause a major headache. The student's life could be in jeopardy and would force the student to work double shifts to pay off that debt. Lennon's article about college debts mentions that college's loans have driven higher, an average in $26,000 in student loans. (Lennon, "With College debts looming, payoff still achievable"). Students considered not responsible for their actions, should not carrying money that is not theirs.
This defines human instinct that if something cost a lot then this thing should be worth it for the time and the effort that were spend on it. A parallel that you might consider of that continuous is the low performance and pricy cars at the same time; liberal art schools, is like those unworthy cars. However, there has been a huge debate in the recent years exists about the money that students pay during th... ... middle of paper ... ...-one student-faculty ratio” which solves that issue. Finally, some would argue that students should take classes from many different majors so that they have enough insights and values to live by. This philosophy won’t benefit the students a lot due to the confusion that it builds inside students’ brains.
The amount of pressure put one students today is incredible. Teachers have to teach so much in a short amount of time, so that they can cover everything that students need to know to pass the tests at the end of the year. Information is being crammed down students’ necks and it’s not helping it’s hindering them. So much focus is put on getting a good grade that students will do anything to get that grade. Independent Scholar, Alfie Kohn found that “the more students are led to focus on getting good grades, the more likely they are to cheat, even if they themselves regard cheating ad wrong” (2).