Analysis Of Walt Whitman

1083 Words3 Pages

Walt Whitman’s Religious Vision Embedded at the Heart of Leaves of Grass as seen through the poem, Song of Myself The poetry in Whitman’s Leaves of Grass is specifically forceful. It was written at a time when Walt Whitman’s personal religious perspective was that he himself was a prophet as stated in his first poem “Song of Myself.” This poem appears in Whitman’s first book Leaves of Grass. Whitman says: “Divine am I and out, and I make holy water whatever I touch or am touched from; / The scent of these armpits is aroma finer than prayer; /This head is more than churches or bibles or creeds” (39).The poet’s deistic belief taught him with an appreciation and affection for this perspective of God and nature. Whitman renounced Christianity
Also, he reiterates in his writing, that he is equal to God, the creator. He states: “Nor I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself” (66). In this verse, Walt Whitman than knows the concept of a God. He cannot however, grasp how God can be better than Whitman, for he is God the model of every person. Whitman perceives some visible features of God in humankind. He believes the world is wonderful and has meaning. The writer began envisioning himself as a prophet when he was in the civil war seeing people die. Later, Whitman’s brother got ill and his mother died shortly
He believed that priests are limited to particular teachings because they preach what is written in the Bible while his interpretation of his own faith is deist who is powerful beyond measure. He believe according to the verse: I have heard what the talkers were talking….the talk of the beginning and the end, But I do not talk of the beginning or the end (22). Whitman indirectly talks about religion but, at the same time attempt to weaken the concept of understanding the universe from the religious authority. Whitman’s basic religious principle is life and growth. Both of these exist in the present moment. Whitman also thinks that we could do without worrying so much about the nature of God. However, he does also find the concept useful in his effort to show that divinity is

Open Document