Analysis Of Walking Of The Homeless People

1394 Words3 Pages

In both research articles go into detail about their own theoretical perspective t. One talks about the social processes individuals go through, while the other research article on the walking of the homeless people discuss the three modes of walking that the participants reported. The authors Stephen Hester and David Francis (2003) go into a lot of detail when analysing the visually available mundane order and talk about many of the other social processes that individuals use while understanding the social order when walking. Including the use of navigation which is the practical problem of selecting and evaluating walking paths in order to avoid colliding into another person or object. This is a common activity because most peoples activities …show more content…

During the commentary the author describes to us many different people and activities taking place. The observer infers these to be what they are from its face value however he presents an example where two adults are taking a child for a drive. The author describes this as being a family going out driving because of the assumption that two adults and a child are a family completing a mundane everyday activity, and therefore this is what it is inferred to be (Stephen Hester, David Francis, 2003). They then state this every day scene could be interpreted differently. This normal scene could be interpreted not as a happy family going for a Sunday drive but rather the adults are possible abductors of the child. So what is it that makes us think that something ordinary and mundane is occurring rather than something with more criminal intent? Stephen Hester and David Francis (2003) describe this through a process in that we report the ordinary scene that makes the most sense. This is then transformed into a topic and seek to provide for its production (Stephen Hester, David Francis,

Open Document