Analysis Of Uspensky's Personal Narrative

913 Words2 Pages

Having drawn on Uspensky, and preferring ‘perceptual’ to his psychological plane, Fowler (1986/1996) expands Uspensky’s subjective and objective, or the internal and external narrations into four Types of A, B, C, and D. As an internal narration, Type A is narrated from a POV within a character’s consciousness; in the traditional approach, this type is called the first person narration or the personal narration as put by Stanzel. Type B, as another kind of internal narration, is narrated by an extra-diegetic narrator who is not a character in the story but he is able to focalize the story within one of the character’s mind. This type is dominant in TTL. However, as a kind of external narration, Type C is narrated by an omniscient narrator “from a position outside of …show more content…

Category B narratives are divided into the third person, omniscient narrative, and the third-person limited narratives, each corresponding with different terms proposed by Stanzel, Genette, Uspensky, and Fowler, about which I have explained in detail here and there in this study, and they will suffice. Of course, the important point here is the way in which Simpson’s categories are used with different epistemic, deontic, and boulomaic modalities, to which I shall come later. In fact, taking the study of POV a step further than above-mentioned scholars, Simpson draws heavily on Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics to study POV through two systems of ‘modality’ and ‘transitivity’. Therefore, what makes Simpson’s approach much more distinctive lies in the way in which he has tried to bring into the narrative text some linguistic methods that help us in a great deal not only to study the stylistic features of the original text but to take into account these features in the translated narrative texts as

Open Document