Religulous analysis
Bill Maher; an American actor, comedian and political commentator travels around the world looking for religious locations that represent the holy faith of Christianity, Judaism, Islam and so on. In his expedition to finding answers to his questions, he reveals his expressions of doubt in religion. As Maher quotes “Doubt is humble, and that’s what man needs to be, considering that human history is just a litany of getting shit dead wrong” (Maher) it shows his real attitude towards different religions. Although, the documentary “Religulous” by Larry Charles was good, it did have a bias argument that attacked his opponents at a weak point, which utilized the half-truth of their belief.
In the film, Maher’s overall argument is established weather or not his thesis of certain religions are true based on what they believe. As he interviews many people from around the world such as; Dr. Francis Collins, Dr. Jeremiah Cummings, John Westcott, Dr. Dean Hamer and so on, he stands to what he believes in, that god does not exist. Throughout the movie, Maher keeps pointing out an Ad Hominem Tu Quoque argument that attacks his opponent of their beliefs and does not give them a chance to strongly defend their position. Although, he continuously disrupts his opponents, he does follow his conclusion from his premises and gives out many opinions of god.
In spite of Maher defending his position, there was a particular argument that I did not agree upon. For instance, Maher quotes in the end of the film “Religion is dangerous because it allows human beings who don’t have all the answers to think that they do”. He was oblivious to the fact that god could or could not exist. Aside from his overall judgment on Christianity, Juda...
... middle of paper ...
...sis look like he was in it for the win and not to prove a point. Although, I did agree on some of his words, I was not satisfied of the structure of his argument. He could have made better dispute over the bible but was unable to do so. Nether less, we all have to get the idea that no religion is perfect nor the people believing in different gods. They may be true or maybe not. But who knows? In the end of the day, we all have to live together as one and question our reason to live. But for now, is it better to judge someone’s religion because of the lack of evidence or attack them because you want to know why you are here. After all, one’s person beliefs is their own and not another’s. For it gives them faith, hope and someone to lead them on choosing different paths.
Work Cited
Charles, Larry, dir. Religulous. Writ. Maher. 2008. Film. 29 Sep 2013.
begin to see the mysteries that we can understand his point of views. He also describes Jesus as
Evans, C. Stephen. Critical Dialog in Philosophy of Religion. 1985. Downers Grove, IL. InterVarsity Press. Taken from Philosophy of Religion - Selected Readings, Fourth Edition. 2010. Oxford University Press, NY.
are letting know-nothingism thrive in todays cultures. With this in mind he sets out to disprove
that render this argument as flawed: he limits the scope of his philosophy to people
Mann, Mark Grear. “Religious Pluralism.” Philosophy of Religion. Ed. Thomas Jay Oord. Kansas City: Beacon Hill Press, 2003. Print.
Hitchens, Christopher. God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. New York: Twelve, 2007. Print.
Religion and human nature combined tend to create a superiority complex among those who perceive themselves as having better, or more, faith. Religion is generally perceived as singular, but humans choose to dynamically express their faith, whether that be by love or war. Gandhi, depicted the movie Gandhi directed by Richard Attenborough, in the face of Muslims protesting Hindus, declared: “I am a Muslim and a Hindu and a Christian and a Jew and so are all of you,” and that perception of himself and others influenced a mass ethnic and religious revolution that enlightened India. Gandhi opened the world to revolutionary ideas -- the strength in tolerance, the pluralism in religion, and the unification of all mankind.
In John Perry's book Dialogue on Good, Evil and the Existence of God, he used three characters in the dialogue in order to clarify the positions of the three characters (Weirob, Miller, and Cohen), the arguments they provide in support their positions and the "end state" of their discussion. This allows us to examine our understanding of the good, evil and the existence of God.
... he is not justified by anything universal, but precisely by being a single individual and having faith, over ethics, in God.
Film Analysis - The Notebook Introduction The film is portrayed in the past and present scenario setting. It is based on a young couple’s love and passion for one another, but are unexpectedly separated due to the disapproval of the teen girl parents and the social differences in their life. At the start of the movie, it displays a nursing home style setting with an elderly man named Duke (James Garner), reading to an elderly woman named Mrs. Hamilton (Gena Rowlands), whose memory is inevitably deteriorating. The story he reads to her is a love story about two teenagers named Allie (Rachel McAdams) and Noah (Ryan Gosling), that met in the 1940’s at a carnival in Seabrook Island, South Carolina.
The movie, Fifty Shades of Grey, portrayals its dominant ideology sexuality through the story between two main characters: a female literature student named Anastasia Steele, and a young male billionaire Christian Grey. In this movie, it indicates strong traditional heterosexuality, and it reflects the gender roles about submission and dominance, which leads to gender inequality through misinformation. Although entertaining and refreshing, this movie brings more negative impacts more than positive ones.
There is an intellectual discussion over the accuracy of war films and whether or not these should focus more on telling the truth or decorating it a little. Indeed, the narrative of war films has change throughout the years because the purpose of such films has evolved, especially those representing the World War II years and the aftermath. At the time of war, films were employed with diverse objectives for example to urge the public to support the war, to narrate the latest events, or to rebuild the image of the heroes. Most of the times the perspectives of films could vary depending on the country the film was produced in or which side of the story was being narrated. The plot of most war films might not be real, but they were necessary
Love is a word that’s been both miss-used and over-used all at once. Romantic movies change our definition of and have a big impact on this definition greatly. There have been many movies and novels made over love, but never like this. “The Notebook” is a love story about unconditional love that two people have for each other. This emotionally, heart touching story will have your eyes blood-shot and burning from you not wanting to blink your eyes. This tremendously wonderful love story will have you not wanting to even miss a millisecond of this heart throbbing film. With many plot twists and many scenes that will have you falling off of your seat and you not having any nails by the end of the movie, this is the movie for you. This emotionally rich film is full of action, laughter, and romance, which is the perfect trio combination. This movie shows us how love can bind us together forever. This film went above and
and the religion he was brought up in, to be the best." And this discredits the
...beliefs represented in his quotations. I do not feel that he ever really counter argued anything due to the fact that it was never clearly stated where he stood on the subject. I feel that the quotations used supporting life starting at conception did a good job of refuting the stance that it begun at any point after but I don't think he himself ever argued anything in the essay.