Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American social classes in the 1920s
The distinction of upper society classes in the 1920s
The distinction of upper society classes in the 1920s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American social classes in the 1920s
The “Gorgeous Incongruities”: Polite Politics and Public Space on the Streets of Nineteenth Century New York, shows the reader the major differences between modern day New York City and Nineteenth Century New York City. In Nineteenth Century New York, the streets were used to parade social class ranking, as well as to in some ways judge those who walk the streets, which is depicted in the first few sentences of the article. However, when one goes into the city today, it couldn’t be any more different. It’s not about how rich someone is, or how poor someone is. Quite frankly people today could care less about those around them.
The article, The “Gorgeous Incongruities”: Polite Politics and Public Space on the Streets of Nineteenth Century New
…show more content…
It seems that in Wharton’s images of the city everyone cares about what other people are up to. Where as, now when one walks around the city there is very little interaction, and very little caring of what others are doing. People who are in the city now very rarely care about the actions of those around them. “Edith Whartons characters were not free in their behavior on the streets of New York; they were intensely guarded in their displays, aware all the time of how their public communicated their identities”. According to the author, this resembles a sense of public in which public space refers to a place under scrutiny, or removed from privacy of the …show more content…
Almost 85% of the population lived less than two miles from union square, otherwise known as the city’s population center. In this section of the article the author touches on different types of people found within the city’s limits. In the 1860’s New York city, much as it is today, was defined by extremes in wealth and poverty, ethnic and racial diversity, and power. However, one major difference between 1960’s New York and todays New York is the social class system. In thw 1960’s the social class system in the city was very unstable, where as today, in my opinion, it is much more stable. Really, our social class system anywhere is much more stable now than it has ever been. The streets of the city in the 1960’s not only provided transportation corridors, but were also runways to show off social class and political power. I enjoyed that the author brings up the important icons of the city known as Broadway and Fifth Avenue. These two icons had become important for portraying the city. Which, in all honesty, when one who is not from the city thinks of New York, the first two places one most likely thinks of is Broadway and Fifth Avenue, because to us that is the city. Along with Broadway and Fifth Ave, came Wall Street, and along with that addition came symbolic streetscapes that were usually highlighted in contemporary accounts. In my opinion these are the areas that make the city what it
Several works we have read thus far have criticized the prosperity of American suburbia. Jack Kerouac's The Dharma Bums, Philip Roth's Goodbye, Columbus, and an excerpt from Lawrence Ferlinghetti's poem "A Coney Island of the Mind" all pass judgement on the denizens of the middle-class and the materialism in which they surround themselves. However, each work does not make the same analysis, as the stories are told from different viewpoints.
Gilbert Osofsky’s Harlem: The Making of a Ghetto paints a grim picture of inevitability for the once-exclusive neighborhood of Harlem, New York. Ososfky’s timeframe is set in 1890-1930 and his study is split up into three parts. His analysis is convincing in explaining the social and economic reasons why Harlem became the slum that it is widely infamous for today, but he fails to highlight many of the positive aspects of the enduring neighborhood, and the lack of political analysis in the book is troubling.
The author skirts around the central issue of racism by calling it a “class struggle” within the white population of Boston during the 1960s and 1970s. Formisano discuses the phenomenon known as “white flight”, where great numbers of white families left the cities for the suburbs. This was not only for a better lifestyle, but a way to distance themselves from the African Americans, who settled in northern urban areas following the second Great Migration.
Before African Americans moved to this area, Harlem was “designed specifically for white workers who wanted to commute into the city” (BIO Classroom). Due to the rapid growth of white people moving there and the developers not having enough transportation to support those people to go back and forth between downtown to work and home most of the residents left. Th...
Throughout the novel, East Egg demonstrates time after time the shallow underbelly of New York’s upper side. The inhabitants of this section of the city are what are known as the “old money”, meaning they come from families with money passed down through generation upon generation. Nick Carraway demonstrates unto the reader the grandeur of the area when he says, “Across the courtesy bay the white palaces of fashionable East Egg glittered along the water…” (Fitzgerald 5) referring to the homes opposite the bay of his. The people who occupy these homes, such as Tom and Daisy Buchanan and Jordan Baker, have never had to work a single day in their lives to secure and maintain their lavish and luxurious lifestyles, and will never have to because of the money that their families have procured throughout the generations. People here are reckless, and tend to not want to take responsibility for their actions. Jordan demonstrates...
Chalmers, David. And the Crooked Places Made Straight: The Struggle for Social Change in the 1960s. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
Edith Wharton's The House of Mirth presents an interesting study of the social construction of subjectivity. The Victorian society which Wharton's characters inhabit is defined by a rigid structure of morals and manners in which one's identity is determined by apparent conformity with or transgression of social norms. What is conspicuous about this brand of social identification is its decidedly linguistic nature. In this context, behaviors themselves are rendered as text, and the incessant social appraisal in which the characters of the novel participate is a process of deciphering this script of behavior. People's actions here are read, as it were, according to the unique social grammar of this society. The novel's treatment of this conception of social reading is brought to the fore through its devaluing of written texts in favor of legible behaviors.
“It was if there was a social moat that divided these two New Yorks.” This quote from the movie The Central Park Five, explains the divide between the poor part of New York, such as Harlem, and the upper class areas. This divide was caused by an economic crisis that changed the social dynamics of the city. This change allowed for consequences such as the injustice of the Central Park Five and the causes of this injustice can be explained by three different theoretical perspectives: the Structural Functionalist Perspective, the Symbolic Interactionist Perspective, and the Conflict Perspective.
The book asks two questions; first, why the changes that have taken place on the sidewalk over the past 40 years have occurred? Focusing on the concentration of poverty in some areas, people movement from one place to the other and how the people working/or living on Sixth Avenue come from such neighborhoods. Second, How the sidewalk life works today? By looking at the mainly poor black men, who work as book and magazine vendors, and/or live on the sidewalk of an upper-middle-class neighborhood. The book follows the lives of several men who work as book and magazine vendors in Greenwich Village during the 1990s, where mos...
Jonnes, Jill. “South Bronx rising: the rise, fall, and resurrection of an American city.” New York: Fordham University Press. (1986).
In the Victorian era, in New York City, men and women roles within the society were as different as night and day. A man regardless of his extra curricular activities could still maintain a very prevalent place in society. A woman’s worth was not only based family name which distinguished her class and worth, but also her profession if that was applicable.
was appealing because in the city there was new technology available, but the increasing migration to the cities caused extreme poverty for families in the city and forced the wealthy to move. The large surplus of people into the city led to “the prodigious increase of the tenement-house population,” or the increasingly amount of people who lived in the dumbbell tenements (Riis 275). The dumbbell tenements were hardly a solution to the growing problem of people because they could, though not comfortably, accommodate an entire family in one room for a cheap price. The poor people who lived in the tenements were typically the families who needed to have all members, women and children alike, working to have the money they needed to live. In contrast to the poor, the wealthy people began to strongly dislike the growing population of poor in the beautiful cities, so the solution to their problems was to escape the stench that was the city and move to suburban areas just outside of the city. Many people saw the chance to be “commuters, [or] those who lived in the suburbs and traveled in and out of the city for work,” and they “began to increase in number” (American Memory Timeline). The wealthier people could to use their fortunes to leave the cities and live just outside of them, but they were still capable of commuting to the cities for work and leisure. Urbanization to the cities made for an overly-packed place for a family home, but it was the only place the poor could afford to live, unlike the rich who moved to suburban areas around the
History textbooks seem to always focus on the advancements of civilization, often ignoring the humble beginnings in which these achievements derive. How the Other Half Lives by journalist-photographer Jacob A. Riis explores the streets of New York, using “muck-racking” to expose just how “the other half lives,” aside from the upbeat, rich, and flapper-girl filled nights so stereotypical to New York City in the 1800s. During this time, immigrants from all over the world flooded to the new-born city, bright-eyed and expecting new opportunities; little did they know, almost all of them will spend their lives in financial struggle, poverty, and crowded, disease-ridden tenements. Jacob A. Riis will photograph this poverty in How the Other Half Lives, hoping to bring awareness to the other half of New York.
The English public park from 1840-1860 provides a physical reflection of this Victorian frame of mind in that it exemplifies one of the grave contradictions that defines the upper-middle class Victorian society which boasts for universality of its ideals for all yet is exclusionary toward the proletariats.
In Francis Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby, the city of New York possesses a “transitory” and “enchanted” quantity, which “for the last time in history” rivaled man's “capacity for wonder” (182). New York City, a symbol of American greatness and the American dream, contains very unamerican class distinction: those whose families have been prominent and rich for decades function as a de facto aristocracy, looking down upon and controlling (through vast wealth) the poor. These class distinctions are mirrored by geography, dividing up the maps into regions by wealth. The parallelism of the region and the residents results in the region symbolizing the residents. Through analyzing both the residents and the description of the region, a holistic understanding can be gained about the residents of Valley of Ashes, East Egg, and West Egg.