Also, if the U.N. were to take charge, the cost to deliver their services globally would be far too costly for website like google. Since many Countries have their own agendas and policies implemented, there is no need for the U.N. to regulate the Internet. Since Internet monitoring is a controversial issue on a political and societal scale, it has both negatives and positives that benefit both the government and people. Although some may oppose Internet monitoring, it is necessary in some circumstances. It can help prevent and detect cybercrime, unauthorized access to sensitive data, and terrorism.
These software products include, but are not limited to, the Microsoft Office Suite and Internet Explorer browser. One of the leading questions is if this is a “good” state of affairs: should one company so dominate computing and the Internet when we rely so heavily upon it? The most recent lawsuit involves the Justice Department and 20 state attorneys general. They believe that Microsoft has used its monopoly in operating system software to protect its dominance and eliminate competitors. The government says that in the long run, consumers will be harmed, because there will be less competition and fewer choices.
(Bill Summary) Part of CISPA's good intentions include an effort to bridge the longstanding communication disconnect among different branches of the intelligence community, the private sector, and the government on matters of cyber-security. This is argument for this paper. The House's Stop Online Piracy Act a... ... middle of paper ... ...ting surveillance programs without warrants. The final reason being there is no clarity in the bill as to what the information will be used for. "It should be used for cyber security purposes only, but the bill doesn't say that," Reitman said (Rushe, Dominic para.
As consumers, our growing dependence on technology allows these corporations to know and control every move we take. The section about collecting users’ data under Google’s terms of service exemplifies privacy invasion, but the most alarming part is that we do not care about it for most of the times. We regard privacy less important than the technology we are able to use by simply agreeing to give the data away. It is time we ask ourselves whether technology companies have gone too far in their reach of market domination and whether it “reduce the capacity of democracy to respond to citizens’ concerns” (Reich
This is a problem because with no laws or policies protecting the private internet user companies will be able to do what they want with the information and nothing will stop them. A major reason the U.S. needs to increase restrictions on the type and amount of data collected on individuals from the internet is due to the fact that the United States government can track communications and browsing histories of private citizens without warrant or cause. After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, ... ... middle of paper ... ... posts from their college years, this may affect if that individual gets hired or not. As can be seen, the need for these restrictions and legal repercussions are needed for the individual internet user. As can be seen, from the information presented, the need for laws and restrictions concerning internet data collection is greatly needed.
Websites like Facebook, Twitter, and Google retain vast amounts of personal information of their users. Although this practice benefits the user as well, unrestricted profiling can be quite unnerving. Since regulation from the government may impede Internet use, and unless the threat to internet users privacy are shown to exceed the benefits, the government will not regulate the internet, rather we should educate the public how to be more responsible themselves. The most lucrative business on the Internet is marketing. Companies have come up with ingenious ways to generate revenue with very targeted advertising.
With everyone joining the online world your privacy is at even greater risk then ever before. The internet has become part of our everyday lives, from social networking to online transactions. Your privacy is threatened every day. However is our privacy threatened by our own government? According to the pew research data 56% of Americans say that it is acceptable for the NSA to run through millions of Americans phone records in order to prevent terrorism.
Apple, a well known billion dollar company have been so successful at keeping their customers privacy protected. The privacy of personal information is very sensitive to Apple and the FBI should not be allowed to be able to obtain access to anyone’s personal info... ... middle of paper ... ...d. The creation of the new operating system will also create a dangerous precedent for future companies that will affect everyone negatively. The risk that will arise from this conflict could possibly allow the FBI and hackers to all Apple customers privacy. Though making the backdoor system would help the FBI obtain all necessary information regarding the San Bernardino Terrorists, this create a domino effect that will ultimately affect all people. The FBI claims that they will only use the operating system once if they receive it but prior evident proves that it will not be true.
Even offering a heavily censored and handicapped version of their search engine, Google's revenue producers AdSense and AdWords could still make billions. Google is well known as the world's most recognized brands and ignoring China's vast population from a business sense would be a regrettable decision. Google, like all international companies, must work with the governments of the countries they do business with and abide by their rules and statutes. Although the current Chinese regime has been strong on internet censorship, in the future they may change their stance and become more progressive on censorship. This could only take place with a highly-unlikely radical change in the political structure of China, but to already have a solid user base leading into that situation would be highly advantageous.
The new internet legislation acts, SOPA and PIPA, are creating serious disputes between internet corporations and national authorities. Those acts seem to be hindering global freedom of expression, which goes against the bases of the concept of the cyber-world. The internet has proved to be one of the most revolutionary concept and tool of the century taking communication and sharing of information to a whole new level. From education to arts and politics, people have access to knowledge with little or no limits. The dependance on the internet has become of great importance in today's world, and so imposing regulations and limits to it creates a controversial polemic worldwide.