The Global Financial Crisis of 2008: Can Dodd-Frank Help?
The Financial Crisis of 2008 became an experience that the American people will not forget any time very soon. The country took a direct hit to the financial sector during the crisis due to several changes that had taken place. Banks and financial investment companies were two of the many types of businesses that suffered. The consumers began to be fearful when it came to working with banks and financial investment companies. As a result of the crisis, new regulations were put in place to keep everything regulated. The regulations of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act were made to monitor and track the financial firms and enforce regulations to keep from having a repeat of the financial crisis of 2008. The main goal of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is to put new regulations in place to monitor the financial industry more strictly to help prevent another crisis from occurring.
Mortgage Lending Standards
Several changes were made to the mortgage lending standards to make it easier for homeowners to potentially own their home. This became the first problem that eventually led to the crisis. The lending standards were changed in order to promote home ownership. This made it easy for first time homeowners and homeowners in general to borrow money at a low interest rate very easy. The homeowner could walk in to a bank and almost always get approved for a loan without any question. The homeowner was also able to get approved for the loan with little to no down payment (Conners and Gwartney 63).
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development guidelines required Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to accept a smaller down p...
... middle of paper ...
...-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the economy appears to be coming back from its downfall. Interest rates are beginning to rise. The Dow Jones Industrial Average hit its record high since the market crash. The automobile and housing industry is starting to come back from its horrendous downfall.
Consumers are also beginning to put their trust back in the investment companies and financial banks. During the crisis, consumers began to pull all of their money out of their investments because they were afraid that they would lose everything they had. They also didn’t want to leave anything in their bank accounts for fear of the banking system collapsing. Once the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 began to be implemented. Consumers started coming around with the help from their bankers and investment advisors.
Consequently, the provisions to separate commercial banking from securities and investment firms were regarded as a way to diminish the risk associated with providing such deposit insurance. Although some historians argue that the depression itself is what caused the collapse of the banking system, in 1933 the general consensus was that banks had provoked the failure by engaging in shady and abusive practices with depositor’s money. Congressional hearings conducted in early 1933 seemed to indicate that bankers and brokers were guilty of “disreputable and seemingly dishonest dealings, and gross misuses of the public's trust” (“Understanding How”, 1998). The Glass Steagall act was the main legislative response of President Roosevelt’s administration to the unprecedented financial turmoil that was facing the nation in the middle of a deep depression. It was intended to regulate and stabilize the banking industry, reduce risk, and provide consumers with confidence in the financial
Likewise, Andra C. Grant says, “Between 1929 and 1932, home prices in New York fell an average of 50% and the unemployment rate rose substantially. As a result, many residential mortgages were at serious risk of foreclosure. Lenders in the 1930s faced substantial incentives to avoid foreclosure” (Grant). Most Americans couldn’t afford to buy a home prior to this downfall. The down payment was 80% upfront, and people only had five to seven years to pay the remaining amount (“How Did the FHA Help End the Great Depression?”). However, in 1934 a reform called the Federal Housing Administration uprooted. (“How Did the FHA Help End the Great Depression?”). It helped recreate the failing housing market. It is known for lowering down payments, creating a longer loan period, and introducing the idea of paying interest over time and loan standards (“How Did the FHA Help End the Great Depression?”). Through solving the housing problems, the Federal Housing Administration helped get America back on its
The year 2008 was a very scary one for anyone involved in the US stock market. Due to subprime lending, and cheap mortgages, the housing market became grossly overinflated. Naturally, as with a balloon that’s filled too much, it “popped”. The resulting collapse of the housing bubble had severe implications for the rest of the US economy, housing, and related industries such as lumber, construction, and realty all came crashing down, and the people employed in those fields soon found themselves out of work. As with the stock market crash of 1929, fear of the economic instability caused people to pull their money out of any investments they had. This can be a problem for a healthy bank, being unable to supply the money people are requesting if it’s tied up in loans. However, this would prove to be an even bigger problem if the money never existed in the first place, and would take down one of the largest scams in American history.
The shares values had fallen and this left people panicking. Many businesses closed and several of the banks did not last because of the businesses collapsing. Many people lost their jobs because of this factor. Congress passed Roosevelt’s Emergency Banking Act, which helped reorganize the banks and closed the ones that were insolvent. Then three days later he urged Americans to put their savings back in their banks and by the end of the month basically three quarters of them reopened. Many people refer to the Banking Act as the Glass Steagall Act that ended up prohibiting commercial banks from engaging in the investment business and created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The purpose of this was to get rid of the speculations in securities making banking safer than before. The demand for goods were declining, so the value of the money was
"Home Owners Loan Corporation." Next New Deal. Roosevelt Institute, 2014. Web. 16 Mar. 2014. .
However prior to 2008, nearly everyone was blind to their impending doom; investors, bankers, government regulators, the general population, and even the chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, a man who was considered the economic guru, was fooled into believing the prosperity America had been enjoying would last for the foreseeable future (“Rethinking” 20). By this time there had been only mild economic downturns or, at most, short periods of turmoil. Financial institutions and large corporations had grown accustomed to the decades of economic prosperity resulting from the post-war economic boom, long forgetting the lessons learned from the Great Depression (“Rethinking” 20). In fact, economists concluded that America had entered a new era of calm. After a generation of portfolio managers and investors profiting from decades of favorable returns on stocks they believed the modern economy was impervious to major calamities (“Rethinking” 20). As inflation rates fell from record highs in the late 1970s and early 1980s to the record lows that they are today, interest rates followed enabling Americans to borrow more money from
There was a new concept of credit nicknamed "buy now, pay later." Not long after this concept came to be, the stock market crashed. For the decades before the current housing crisis, buying homes and loaning money was a simple, but strict, affair and had two outcomes. Either the borrower could pay back the money owed, or they could not pay the money back. If the borrower could pay the money back, they could keep their house or whatever they took out the loan for.
A majority of mortgage defaults that Americans used were on subprime mortgage loans, which were high-interest-rate loans lent to people with high risk credit rates (Brue). Despite knowing the risks, the Federal government encouraged major banks to lend out these loans to buyers, in hopes, of broadening ho...
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act brought the most significant changes to financial regulation in the United States since the reform that followed the Great Depression. It made changes in the American financial regulatory environment that affect all federal financial regulatory agencies and almost every part of the nation’s financial services industry. Like Glass-Steagall, the legislation passed after the Great Depression, it sought to regulate the financial markets and make another economic crisis less likely. Banks were deregulated in 1999 by the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act, which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act and essentially allowed for the excessive risk taken on by banks that caused the most recent financial crisis. The Financial Stability Oversight Council was established through the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and was created to address the systemic risks in the United States financial system and to improve coordination among financial regulators.
It can be argued that the economic hardships of the great recession began when interest rates were lowered by the Federal Reserve. This caused a bubble in the housing market. Housing prices plummeted, home prices plummeted, then thousands of borrowers could no longer afford to pay on their loans (Koba, 2011). The bubble forced banks to give out homes loans with unreasonably high risk rates. The response of the banks caused a decline in the amount of houses purchased and “a crisis involving mortgage loans and the financial securities built on them” (McConnell, 2012 p.479). The effect on the economy was catastrophic and caused a “pandemic” of foreclosures that effected tens of thousands home owners across the U.S. (Scaliger, 2013). The debt burden eventually became unsustainable and the U.S. crisis deepened as the long-term effect on bank loans would affect not only the housing market, but also the job market.
One of the major unintended impacts of the Dodd-Frank Act has been on credit unions and community banks. These banks weathered the credit crisis and lost only 6% of their share of banking assets between 2006 and mid-2010. A recent Harvard study indicates that this decline accelerated to 12% since the passage of the Dodd-Frank in July 2010. [a] While the community banks’ earnings increased by 12% to $5.3 billion by mid 2015 the number of these banks had declined according to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The number of banks with assets under $1 billion has declined from around 7500 in 2010 to less than 6000 since Dodd-Frank came into effect. [b] Increased compliance costs due hiring of new personnel to interpret the new regulations compelled these banks to cut down on customer service amongst other things. The law hurt them disproportionately and forced them to consolidate. Regulatory economies of scale drive the process of consolidation. A larger bank is often more equipped at handling increased regulatory burdens
This essay will examine the causes of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) from a Marxist perspective. This paper will specifically examine and critique how Marx’s Theory of Crisis can be applied to understand and interpret the underlying structural causes of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.
In October of 1929, the American economy took a huge hit from the stock market crash. Since so much people had invested their money and time in the banks, when the banks closed many had lost all of their money and were in the deep poverty. Because of this, one of my first actions of the New Deal was the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Every bank in the United States had to abide by this rule. This banking program I launched not only ensured the safety and protection of deposits made my users of banks, but had also restored America’s faith in banks, causing people to once again use banks which contributed in enriching the economy. Another legislation I was determined to get passed...
The "subprime crises" was one of the most significant financial events since the Great Depression and definitely left a mark upon the country as we remain upon a steady path towards recovering fully. The financial crisis of 2008, became a defining moment within the infrastructure of the US financial system and its need for restructuring. One of the main moments that alerted the global economy of our declining state was the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on Sunday, September 14, 2008 and after this the economy began spreading as companies and individuals were struggling to find a way around this crisis. (Murphy, 2008) The US banking sector was first hit with a crisis amongst liquidity and declining world stock markets as well. The subprime mortgage crisis was characterized by a decrease within the housing market due to excessive individuals and corporate debt along with risky lending and borrowing practices. Over time, the market apparently began displaying more weaknesses as the global financial system was being affected. With this being said, this brings into question about who is actually to assume blame for this financial fiasco. It is extremely hard to just assign blame to one individual party as there were many different factors at work here. This paper will analyze how the stakeholders created a financial disaster and did nothing to prevent it as the credit rating agencies created an amount of turmoil due to their unethical decisions and costly mistakes.
During the 1920s, approximately 20 million Americans took advantage of post-war prosperity by purchasing shares of stock in various securities exchanges. When the stock market crashed in 1929, the fortunes of many investors were lost. In addition, banks lost great sums of money in the Crash because they had invested heavily in the markets. When people feared their banks might not be able to pay back the money that depositors had in their accounts, a “run” on the banking system caused many bank failures. After the crash, public confidence in the market and the economy fell sharply. In response, Congress held hearings to identify the problems and look for solutions; the answer was found in the new SEC. The Commission was established in 1934 to enforce new securities laws that were passed with the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The two new laws stated that “Companies publicly offering securities must tell the public the truth about their businesses, the securities they are selling and the risks involved in the investing.” Secondly, “People who sell and trade securities must treat investors fairly and honestly, putting investors’ interests first.”2