Analysis Of The Film 'Inarritu'

Inarritu is one of the finest artist of our generation. He may lack Spielberg’s versatility as every film of his are deeply rooted in humanistic relations and values. But he is master of his craft, none of the present filmmakers comprehend human conditions better than Inarritu. From traversing interconnected human relations on the streets of Mexico to encompass human emotions virtually anywhere in the planet. He made us aware that even though we are different from each other in terms of culture, language and traditions, there is a sense of underlying commonality we all share. In a world defined by politics, greed, power and authoritarian regimes, he made us realize that comprehending human connectedness may be essential for the ethical future

A middle class once jailed man (Del Toro) struggles to find deeper meaning of his wretched life through evangelicalism only to discover that it is he who actually navigates and commands his life. Meanwhile, an ailing math professor (Penn) needs a heart transplant to survive. He gets a new heart, and his endeavor to find the owner of the heart gives him new love in the process. A middle class wife (Watts) finds happiness and redemption from her drug ridden life, in her comfortable middle-class husband and children, but unfortunately she loses them in a random hit and run accident. She finds new love with the math professor and then gains a second chance at redemption when she discovers she's pregnant to yet another dead man. It is the clash of such antagonisms and conflicts that drives 21 Grams. Watts’s obsessive need for vengeance, Del Toro’s compulsion for absolving self-sacrifice, results in the death of the relatively innocent math professor (Penn). Innaritu makes innocent dies in 21 grams, as if the only crime they committed were aligning with flawed people. The three powerful stories assimilate into a single narrative, like a puzzle, which the viewer completely conjoins by the end of the