Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Modern relevance of the crucible
Character of john Proctor
Character and characterisation of the crucible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Modern relevance of the crucible
The Crucible, as Originally produced by Arthur Miller in 1953, is a well acclaimed tragedy that still holds reverence today. Given its prestige and overall dramatic richness, it can be understood why the Playmaker’s very own Desdemona Chiang chose to recreate and reimagine the play. The Crucible, being set in Salem Massachusetts, is centered around the spectacle of witch hunts that occurred in the year 1692. As imagined, mass hysteria, fear, and paranoia, occurred because of this. The plot of the play is centered around the protagonist John proctor (Ariel Shafir), a prideful man who finds himself entangled in these bizarre events. Throughout the play, Proctor (Ariel Shafir) and his allies struggle to convince the Salem townspeople of the nonsense and inaccuracies that surround the witch hunts. The conflict of the play has an underlying message as it represents the struggle between reason of the human mind and irrational hysteria. The theme of The Crucible embodies how a community can turn so quickly on one another, and …show more content…
As Abigail Williams (Allison Altman), Mary Warren (Natalie Cabo), Betty Paris (Gabriella Cila), and the other young girls were depicted screaming, yelling, and flailing on the floor, it created a sensation of chaos and madness. These characters were flailing, as mentioned before, to persecute others and rid the blame from themselves. The movement by these particular characters was disturbing, as their movement was violent and their screams filled the arena. Ultimately, it was not a comfortable or pretty sight for the audience to see. Building to the fear and feeling of chaos, some of the actors went up and down the aisles of the audience shouting during acts III and IV. This closeness and intimacy to the audience members allowed for those viewing the play to feel more involved and to truly take in the tragic events that were
Authors often have underlying reasons for giving their stories certain themes or settings. Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, The Crucible, is a work of art inspired by actual events as a response to political and moral issues. Set in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, The Crucible proves to have its roots in events of the 1950’s and 1960’s, such as the activities of the House Un-American Committee and the “Red Scare.” Though the play provides an accurate account of the Salem witch trials, its real achievement lies in the many important issues of Miller’s time that it dealswith.
In the novel The Crucible, Arthur Miller paints an image in the reader’s mind of the brutality that ensued in the Salem, Massachucettes Witch Trials and ventures into the personal stories of both the victims and the people who initiated the entire catastrophe. History is constantly repeating itself, this becomes apparent by comparing the Salem Witch Trials, Nazi Germany, and the Communist scare in America. When Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible, he kept in mind what some thoughtlesslessly assumed to be an ever expanding Communist revolution and utilized some of the corrupt problems throughout those years in his play. Blind faith, ignorance, disloyalty, fighting for power, and human indecency are all contributing factors of the mass hysteria that ensued during the McCarthyist “witch- hunts” as well as the Salem Witch Trials in The Crucible. Millers intention for writing this story was not only to prove a point about the appalling historic tragedies, but to express the dominance that betrayal, thirst for power, and ignorance have over a community through the characters John Proctor, Abigail, and Reverend Hale.
Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, is set in Salem village where an atmosphere of enmity and mistrust has been created through the conflicts and disagreements many villagers experience throughout the play. Many of these are caused by or, similar to the conflict between Parris and Proctor, are inflated by the many accusations of witchcraft occurring in the village.
“The Crucible”, is a play that tells a real life phenomenon, set in 17oo’s Salem, Massachusetts where a town of Puritans were settled. When a slave woman and a group of young, trouble-making girls begin to act out, the town becomes suspicious and the madness of the witch trials begin. The play serves as an allegory for “The Red Scare” an era in U.S. history that unforgivingly persecuted communists. There are multiple parallels that can be drawn between both of these stories. One major difference is who can be named responsible for each event. In “The Red Scare”, the U.S government is mainly to blame, but in The Crucible we can pinpoint specific characters that greatly contributed to the horror of the witch trials. These characters are John
“I thought, sir, to put some questions as to the Christian character of this house, if you'll permit me.” (Hale, act 2) The Crucible by Arthur Miller is a play that accompanies the townspeople of Salem, Massachusetts as the Salem Witch Trials ensue. The play has a startling similarity to today’s society for being set in the 1690’s as well as having a substantial difference. A crucial similarity between today and the play is the desire to obtain and preserve an untarnished reputation. The notable difference is the religious tolerance of today in contrast to the utter intolerance in the play.
The PlayMakers Repertory Company’s performance of The Crucible accents the theme of good versus evil. Even though the play is centered on the 17th century Massachusetts witch trials, the play incorporates several modern elements. The reinterpretation of this play with these modern elements, such as the costumes and set, reveals the theme of good versus evil. By accenting intense scenes with darkness and giving characters both modern and old-fashioned costumes, the play creates a striking difference between those in the community who are evil and those who are not. The use of more current elements throughout the performance highlights the reminder that ruling through fear and hysteria occurred multiple times throughout history and not only
During the 17th century, the Massachusetts Bay colony is notorious for being plagued with witch-hunting hysteria. This event in history is now recognized as the Salem Witch Trials and has lead us to truly reflect on the themes presented by the actions of people involved. The Crucible (1953) is a play written by Arthur Miller, in which he powerfully and poetically suggests, through the scenes in the novel, that one should never compromise their morality. He does this by introducing the leading character, John Proctor, who faces an impossible situation under the circumstances of morality or death. Thus, Miller poses the idea that it is better to die with your integrity, rather than living but falsely confessing to consorting with the Devil.
In the modern tragedy, The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, the author substantially relies on the effect of setting to paint the abstract concept that cultural and geographical impact can seduce to transformation. John Proctor, the tragic hero, whose dynamic character has been incurring deeply when his wife is falsely arrested for practicing witchcraft. Allegorizing the rise of McCarthyism in 1950, the author adopts this historical setting to echo the hopeless atmosphere and the mass hysteria in the American society, thereof emphasizing the geographical matters to town Salem. These judicial corruptions produce the mass hysteria in town Salem where people are scared because of the absence of justice. However, Arthur Miller’s tragic hero, despite living in the corrupted society, John Proctor exhibits his individuality and integrity and faithfully decides to protect his reputation when he realizes that, “because it is my name and I can not have another.”
The Crucible is one of the most famous American plays, written by Arthur Miller in the 1950s as an attack on McCarthyism. The play takes place in the Salem Witch Trials of the 1690s, but was created as an allegory for the 1950s McCarthyism campaign. This campaign was similar to a witch hunt, in the way that it ruined people’s lives through accusations with no background. However, even the allegory of the story is something that happened more than half a century ago. The story needs to be updated so it is both more culturally relevant and more easily understood by this generation.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is a controversial play that platforms the atrocities and betrayals surrounding the Salem witch trials. While the infamous Salem witch trials are being relayed to the audience, the overarching shroud of Puritanism partakes a defining role in the progression of the play. Early in the play, the decisions and demeanors of the characters are determined by the strict principles of Puritanism, but as the play advances the flaws in Puritan society are realized by all characters. The truly virtuous characters eventually see the flaws in their previous selves and strive to redeem themselves in one way or another. On the other hand, the true villainous characters exhibit a failure to comprehend the
The Crucible is a 1953 play by Arthur Miller. Initially, it was known as The Chronicles of Sarah Good. The Crucible was set in the Puritan town of Salem, Massachusetts. It talks of McCarthyism that happened in the late 1600’s whereby the general public and people like Arthur Miller were tried and persecuted. The Crucible exemplifies persecutions during the Salem Witch Trials. The people were convicted and hung without any tangible proof of committing any crime. Persecutions were the order of the day. When a finger was pointed at any individual as a witch, the Deputy Governor Danforth never looked for evidence against them or evidence that incriminated them; he ordered them to be hanged. This can be seen through his words “Hang them high over the town! Who weeps for those, weeps for corruption!” (1273), the people were persecuted aimlessly. The four main characters in the play, John Proctor, Abigail Adams, Reverend Hale and Reverend Parris, are caught in the middle of the witchcraft panic in the religious Salem, Massachusetts in late 1690’s. Persecution is the most important theme in the Crucible, the leaders and citizens of Salem attacks and persecutes one of their own without any tangible evidence against them.
The Crucible is a play by Arthur Miller, concerning the Salem witch trials of 1692, in the small parish of Salem Village, Massachusetts. In Act I of The Crucible, the situation and initial conflicts of the play are introduced. The first main conflict is between Reverend Parris and the village, and the second main conflict is between Abigail and the Proctors. These conflicts set the tone for the rest of the play, giving the reader an idea of the many conflicts to come.
The Crucible, a play written by Arthur Miller in the 1950s, depicts the Salem Witch Trials of 1692. During this historical event, many innocent people were charged and executed as a result of several young girls trying to avoid punishment for dancing and pretending to conjure the dead. For Miller, the play purposefully draws a parallel between the Salem Witch Trials and the McCarthy hearings that were at their peak when the play was first published. Miller's characters and their actions reflect various aspects of American life that existed in the past and continue to influence us today.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible purposely manipulates the development of the central character to reveal ideas that are both food for thought and have pure entertainment value. Reputation is central to anyone in not just the exclusive Puritan society of 1692 Salem, but in any society. Miller influences the audience with his drama by serving up a feast that leaves on questioning their own individual standing in the world, providing us not with just a dinner, but also a show.
The Crucible is a strong and captivating play that explores several themes from power and politics to social injustice in Salem, Massachusetts, in the 1600s. The play can be analyzed through different criticisms. Firstly, it can be scrutinized for the fundamental merits instead of its standing as a political extent. Secondly, it can be criticized for its feminist nature. The last kind of criticism that can be used to analyze Miller’s play is through psychoanalytic one. Examining the piece from the three different angles offers the reader a deeper perspective about the story by motivating to reflect more deeply on the actions of the characters.