Analysis Of The Book Thief By Markus Zusak

1604 Words4 Pages

Throughout time, children have read stories of brave knights, running into battle with their swords ready to defeat the invader. They have read tales of everyday girls turning into princesses by kissing a frog or wearing a glass slipper. Also, some of these stories contain accounts of historically poignant moments. For example, the novel The Book Thief written by Markus Zusak takes place during World War II. It gives a lasting impression on what this time was like for everyday people and the impacts the war had on them. The author does this through the many storytelling elements incorporated into the book. Also, Zusak displays how people respond to changes within their lives during these taxing times. For instance, the main character, Liesel …show more content…

To begin with, Chinua Achebe uses storytelling to give an insight into Nigerian culture, as well as to foreshadow future events within the book. For example, at one point in the novel, Ekwefi sits Ezinma down to tell her a common folktale in their tribe. In the tale, a greedy tortoise coaxes a group of birds to lend him some feathers so he can join their feast in the sky. After various tricks following the initial one, he then proceeds to eat all of their food and wine, making the birds extremely angry, and as a response, the birds take back their feathers so he cannot fly home. Since he cannot fly home, he asks the birds to send a message to his wife to lay all the soft things out in front of their house so he can jump from the sky. Maliciously, the birds instead ask his wife to lay out all the hard things. When the tortoise jumps, he breaks his shell. A medicine man puts it together again, explaining why tortoise’s shells look the way they do. The author describes, “Low voices, broken now and again by singing, reached Okonkwo from his wives’ huts as each woman and her children told folk stories. Ekwefi and her daughter, Ezinma, sat on a mat on the floor. It was Ekwefi’s turn to tell a story” (Achebe 73). As the book progresses, and an abundance of folktales present themselves, the readers gain an enhanced understanding …show more content…

To begin with, Chinua Achebe does a fantastic job at displaying humans natural response to change through his many highly developed characters. For example, at the end of the book, a clan meeting is interrupted by white messengers, saying it must end immediately. Preoccupied with anger, Okonkwo slaughters one of the messengers. The author writes, “He knew that Umuofia would not go to war. He knew because they had let the other messengers escape. They had broken into tumult instead of action. He discerned fright in that tumult. He heard voices asking: ‘Why did he do it?’ ” (Achebe 151). Following this incident, Okonkwo hangs himself, most likely due to the fact that he could not handle to repercussions for his actions. Also, he knows that things will never go back to how they were and people have changed too much so he has given up, and as a result, loses his will to live. Comparably, Hotel Rwanda utilizes multiple historical events to display how humans react to change. In the beginning of the film, Paul Rusesabagina is faced with the choice of either helping others or solely protecting his family. At one point, they witness a brutal beating of their neighbor by the Hutus. Later that night, Paul’s wife Tatiana Rusesabagina, asks if they could help him because he has always been a good

Open Document