Analysis Of Schechtman's Stories Lives And Basic Survival

1536 Words4 Pages

In Schechtman’s Stories, Lives, and Basic Survival, the author argues through her narrative self-constitution view that narrative is extremely important to our lives, and that we identify with our past actions, while using our larger narrative of our lives to make decisions for the future as a survival technique. She then goes on to explain that we have “empathetic access” to our past decisions, and that we must look at our lives as one large narrative, and learn from living our lives in the past, to survive on as the best possible person in the future. I disagree with her viewpoints because they do not allow the possibility for someone to radically change and they force people to identify with their actions they would not like to be remembered for in the past. In this paper, I will explain Schectman’s “narrative self- constitution” view on narrativity, but disagree with her views that one must identify with their past actions. I will align my view more towards Goldie’s “narrative sense of self” because that people don’t have to identify with their past actions, and that while incredibly difficult, there is a chance for people to forgive themselves for a bad occurrence in the past and radically change for the better. Marya Schechtman …show more content…

A person has a narrative sense of self if through narrative thinking, they realize that they have a present, past, and future. The reason that Goldie uses the specific word “sense” in his “narrative sense of self” is because he believes that narration is a way for someone to think of themselves or of other people. Thus, you can use feelings of self-forgiveness and radically change through “the narrative sense of self” because you can think narratively about the way you want to act or behave in the future without worrying or identifying with your past actions that you don’t want to be identified

Open Document