Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of art to a religion
Religious art and its impact
Religious art and its impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of art to a religion
Object: Necropolis Culture: Archaic architecture Period: Archaic Art Dates: 700-400BCE Cut out of tufa stone. There are many rooms and funerary beds to recreate what the Etruscan homes looked like. There are no designs or paintings on the walls which can indicate that this burial chamber was for people with little money. The doorways and windows cut into the tufa are arched. Etruscans wanted their dead to be buried in a comfortable place and this is why their tombs were similar to their homes. Object 2 (6 points) Object: Votive figure Culture: Sumerian – Near Eastern Period: Sumerian Art Dates: 2600–2350 B.C. Stone sculpture of a man. Hands of the figure are clasped together. This votive statue Appears to be made of terracotta. The figure in the middle is Dionysos, the god of wine. The figures on his right and left appear to be dancing. This krater was most likely used for a drinking party to mix the wine with water. The Krater has a broad body and wide mouth. The handles are placed towards the top of the krater. Figure appear to be painted in a profile view. Comparisons (30 points) Identify each of the objects as above. For the comparisons, compare and contrast the objects in the Exam Pool by singling out ways in which the objects are the same (compare) and ways that they are different (contrast). Object 6a Object: Statue of Nefu and Khenetemsetju Culture: Egyptian sculpture Period: Old Kingdom Dates: 2455-2350 B.C Object 6b Object: Reclining Couple on a Sarcophagus in the Baths of Diocletian Culture: Roman architecture Period: High Empire Dates: 130-190CE Both objects are used as a part for burial and to represent the dead. There are also both representing a male and female figure, presumably a couple. The men both appear at the dominant figures. The man in the statue has his left foot advanced forward and the man in the sarcophagus is a lot larger than that of the women. The man on the statue and the two figures on the sarcophagus appear to have had their noses smashed in. Both objects appear to have been damaged purposely, possibly due to people not liking the deceased
The emotion in the figures is also very different. In the archaic figure, the face contains emotion other than the archaic smile. The eyes are closed with no facial expression. The classical statue on the other hand does not have any facial expressions but has open eyes and no smile.
It is from the Neo-Assyran period during 883-859b.c.e. The highest relief would be its head. The writing was all around the statue in a different writing. It is very big and tall. It is on a good portion of the corner of a hallway. It looks kind of cool with a bull’s body with wings and a human’s head on it. The face is kind of funny because of the beard I guess if long and real even. The human-headed wing bull had five legs.
The process by which this particular statue was created involved using a method developed by Kaikei, a Japanese sculptor. It was a groundbreaking process that involved carving different pieces of wood separately and then joining them together (“Amida”). Instead of using a single object for creating a sculpture, multiple parts could be used to make the statue easier to construct and put together. After the parts were all joined together, the statue was covered in a lacquer finish and gilt was added to the face to give it the golden look.
Many art works such as statues are placed throughout the world in different settings. The most common setting for statues is found in funerary settings. The importance of statues in funerary settings is that they are use to project the power the person had before his death. The seated statue of Khafre enthroned from Gizeh, Egypt, illustrates the idealized pharaoh. Another sculpture is Kouros, from Anavysos, Greece that depicts the heroism of Kroisos dying in battle. The Kouros and Khafre are similar in the way that they both radiate power and serve the purpose of honoring the dead men, yet Khafre has a greater significance because it illustrates the pharaoh in a flawless form and the audience can tell that he was a great ruler by the perfect cut sculpture.
The Statue of a kouros and the Portrait statue of a boy both depict similar subjects, however are greatly different in how they accomplish this task. Through detail, or lack there of, the Greeks and Romans are able to display a certain value they have in its members. These two statues were made about 500 years apart and approach the sculpting process quit differently. The Greek statue seems to use geometric exaggerated lines to form the body while the Romans use a more realistic approach and sculpt the body with a more rounded finish. Statue of a kouros, from about 590 B.C and Portrait of a boy, from about the first century, do not share any great technical aspects and are basically nothing alike.
This is an extremely high relief sculpture made of limestone. It is to be viewed from a frontal standpoint. It however does have a potential for movement. There seems to be a great deal going on in such a close space. It is very crowded, but dramatic. The figures are intertwining with each other all at once even though there are different things happening. It reminds me of a play with scenes. You can actually step in to it and feel as though you are a part of what is happening because of all the different directions each individual is facing.
Through the means of commemorating and remembering those of prestige and importance, tombs and sarcophagi are produced of these individuals. This funerary manner and distinctive burial practice was initiated Etruscan culture and it developed through the means of cremation and inhumation in earns. The concept of placing the remains of individuals in elaborate, thought out spaces was a valuable attribute of these people. The Etruscan objective of creating the best possible outcome in the afterlife dictated the way in which individuals ornamented and became portrayed in their tombs. Presen...
Both of these pieces of art have much in common. Their functions are almost identical. Both were used to mark burial sites and to honor the deceased buried there. The body language of both the pieces’ figures are similar, with one seated and several others standing around them. Neither has color, but unlike the grave stele, the funerary banquet does show some degree of emotion. The figures in the banquet scene have slight smiles. These pieces played an important role in their times, honoring those who had passed on to the afterlife. For both of these people, it was important to memorialize them very similar to our practices today.
The trip to the metropolitan museum was a great trip to learn and to study art. What is art you may ask, well art is an expression you use to show a visual picture. It can be through painting or through sculptures. Some other example of art is music, literature and dancing. For today 's paper we will be talking about art as a sculpture. The two sculptures in this photo are King Sahure and a Nome God and Marble Statue of Dionysos leaning on archaistic female figure (Hope Dionysos). You can find these statues in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. King Sahure and a Nome God is an Egyptian art that was made in 2458-2446 BCE. The artist is unknown. It was during the 5th dynasty and it also belong to the old kingdom. The Marble statue of Dionysos Leaning in the archaistic female figure is a Greco-Roman art. Belonging to the Roman imperial period of the late first century A.D. Augustan or Julio-Claudian period 27 B.C., to 68 AD. It is classified as a stone sculpture and it is made out of marble. The height of the statues is 82 ¾ inches. There is no evidence who was the original artist.
were 10 doors and at end there was a statue of Osiris, the god of the
In regards to subject matter, both pieces of sculpture are of leaders, Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II were the pharaoh and queen of Egypt around 2500 BCE., and Caesar Augustus was the Emperor of Rome from September 23, 63 BCE to August 19, 14 CE., shown in this work as a general from Primaport, Italy.
Deep in the abysmal, rocky contours of modern-day Luxor’s western bank, a collection of dry beds host the Wadi Bidan el-Muluk, otherwise known as the Valley of the Kings (Hawass 9). Here, Ancient Egyptian workers had toiled through scorching desert heat to create a series of tombs that would house the physical bodies of their pharaohs. The choice of isolation for this complex of wadis, their towering and mammoth architecture, as well as the detailed, colorful decoration depict the significance of the tombs to the Ancient Egyptians. Built during Ancient Egypt’s New Kingdom, there are 63 known tombs, most housing the bodies and possessions of renowned pharaohs and god-kings (Hawass 24). With every new archaeological discovery and breakthrough regarding the Valley of the Kings, our understanding of Ancient Egypt continues to flourish. Without debate, the Valley of the Kings – the most majestic and culture-rich burial ground of the world – should be the museum’s next main exhibit because it remains the most important and insightful look into the life, culture, and religion of the Ancient Egyptians.
This stone sculpture is a naked human-like figure standing six feet tall. The body is in chiasmos stance with the left leg slightly bent and the left foot slightly behind the right. The head is turned slightly downward and to the right, and its size is approximately 1/6 of the body. The hair is cropped closely to the head with no part. The body has a defined musculature, however the forearms appear to be missing. There is an object behind and to the right of the right leg that is about 2 feet tall and 10 inches wide.
In Egypt, the Egyptians had a set of burial customs that they believed it is a new life after death. Egyptians believed that the afterlife was very similar to the real life. Therefore, they believed that people would need the same things in real life such as food, drink, clothes, jewelry, and other things. Also, Egyptians believed that people have the soul. Most of poor Egyptians were probably buried in the desert. The poor people would not have much things to bury with them, so they just wrap the body and their clothes . For the wealthy ancient Egyptians, the people were often buried in tombs that called mastabas. The mastabas was the earliest and simplest tomb structure. It was built of mud-brick, and it has the chamber under the tomb. It contained the person's mummified body which is take the body to washed with natron for drying , and it contained food, jewelery and special objects. These tombs were never built for public viewing. Later then, the Egyptians built pyramids to contain the tombs.
Life, chaos, harmony and death are aspects that played a strong role in the belief system of the ancient Egyptian people. These aspects focused on the belief of Gods and Goddesses as well as guidelines that affected how ancient Egyptian people lived their lives. Due to these themes having played a role in the ancient Egyptians lifestyle, many symbols, illustrations and works of art were created to go against the aspects of chaos. Countering the idea of chaos, there are works of art that are seen to symbolize the focus on how the ancient Egyptians tried to achieve a harmonious and balanced life by how they viewed their actions and lifestyle choices. Ancient Egyptian art that focus on symbolic images of their belief system are seen