Analysis Of Mary Shelley 's ' Frankenstein '

1429 Words6 Pages
Sandra Walters Character & Literature Paper #2 Mr Porter In the Analysis of Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” I will compare the characters with their literary choices and reflect on how these choices influence and reflect their individual identities. The main character in “Frankenstein” is Victor Frankenstein the presumed “mad Scientist”. Victor spent his childhood reading about Cornelius Agrippa, a scientist who engaged on the occult and the supernatural. Victor’s childhood was regulated with studies and knowledge and the chance that he happened upon the works of Agrippa, lit a fire in his mind that intrigued him into Agrippa’s world. Agrippa studied the occult and the supernatural studies and his works were disclaimed by many as “sad trash” and unfounded science (Frankenstein 22). The writings of Agrippa still held the interest of Victor and although many discarded his studies, Victor was still interested in learning more. Victor also included such authors as Paracelsus and Abertus Magnus as they enticed him more into their world of Science. I believe that the more Victor read of these authors the more he began to relate to their studies even though his father and others told him that it was “old science” and that the new science had disproven their theories. The fact that these men studied the occult and sorcery interested Victor as he could use this information for his project of creating life from death. Victor attempted to manipulate the teachings from Agrippa although “my incantations were always unsuccessful, I attributed the failure rather to my own inexperience and mistake, than to a want of skill or fidelity in my instructors.” (Frankenstein pg 23). These actions by Victor show that regardless of the thoughts of others h... ... middle of paper ... ...and Henry have their personalities described based on the poetry that they read and enjoy as it reflects on their lives. Finally for Victor, he realizes after the creation and the destruction of the family by the monster, that Agrippa’s “science” of the supernatural may not be what he should have focused more on, but the natural sciences. He was a scientist that wanted to create his own human race, but was not prepared for the consequences. Works Cited "Chapter 2." Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley:. The Literature Network, n.d. Web. 11 Dec. 2014. Dudczak, Rebecca. "A Cultural History of Frankenstein: Paradise Lost." A Cultural History of Frankenstein: Paradise Lost. Mt Holyoke College, 2002. Web. 09 Dec. 2014. Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, and J. Paul Hunter. Frankenstein: The 1818 Text, Contexts, Criticism. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2012. Print.
Open Document