Analysis Of Laurence Sterne's The Sense Of An Ending

1078 Words3 Pages

From its first appearance in 1759, Laurence Sterne’s comic masterpiece reveals its parodic nature by subverting the typical conventions of the novel as a genre (Folkenflik, 2009). From its very title, The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman mocks the usual denomination of “Life and Adventures”, which had become the standard way of presenting a narrative since the successful appearance of The Life and Strange, Surprising Adventures of Robinson Crusoe (1719). By subtly recasting the hackneyed formula, Sterne shifts the reader’s attention from outside to inside: from the factual, objective level of events and actions to the inner dimension of subjective opinions and emotions (Keymer, 2006). Furthermore, the purpose of the title is
This traditional form of narrative writing appears to reflect a well-known type of paradigmatic structure, brilliantly discussed by Frank Kermode in his book The Sense of an Ending (1967).
The purpose of this paper is to focus on the ways in which The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, with its very peculiar writing style, opposes the conventional linear progression towards an ending, by emphasizing what could be called “the sense of a beginning”. Indeed, there are more than one beginning in Tristram Shandy. The following analysis aims to show the crucial passages that reveal, throughout the novel, this fundamental insight about the significance of a continuously renewed
From this perspective, Tristram’s metanarrative underlines the general necessity of telling the story of one’s life in order to achieve self-awareness through the knowledge and acceptance of the past. The process of arranging and reworking former events, shaping them into a compelling though fragmentary story, can lead to a plausible construction and understanding of the self. It is not without reason that the greatest part of Sterne’s novel is devoted to describing in detail all the disasters of Tristram’s first years: his interrupted conception, his adventurous birth, the choice of his name, his bungled christening, the accident with the sash-window that circumcises him (Harries, 2009). Furthermore, the narration of these events is literally interwoven with the voices of the Shandy family, and the narrator is called upon to interpret them, acknowledging the absolute singularity and otherness of each

Open Document