Analysis Of In Our Glory: Photography And Black Life

2444 Words5 Pages

In August 2013, Rolling Stone magazine’s cover had Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s selfie plastered across it. Other media outlets favored using a mugshot of him or a photo of the incident as opposed to a standard photo of the perpetrator. His long curly hair, goatee, expressionless face, and white t-shirt were on newsstands across the nation. This was met with huge backlash especially from the Boston community. Massachusetts State Police sergeant Sean Murphy said that the image was “glamorizing the face of terror” (Boston Magazine, July 18th, 2013). Retailers pulled the issue from their shelves and some (such as BJ’s Wholesale Club) ended their ties with Rolling Stone entirely. Many believed that Tsarnaev’s long curly hair and goatee …show more content…

She focuses on snapshots of a person’s daily life. hooks discusses the significance of these snapshots in the time of post-segregation; when negative stereotypes of African-Americans were rampant. For black people, these snapshots allowed others to see that in reality, black and white people were not all that different. Snapshots allow people to “look at ourselves with new eyes…create oppositional standards of evaluation” and now “[black people] saw [themselves] represented in these images not as caricatures, cartoon like figures; [they] were there in full diversity of body, being, and expression, multidimensional” (hooks, 61). hooks believed that the snapshots broke down the mental barriers between black people and white people in the minds of white people. What the whites learned through the images was that although they believed that the blacks were almost subhuman, in reality, they were no different from them. They both did normal, human activities such as playing games, loving their family, or celebrating. Tsarnaev’s selfie classifies as a snapshot, which is unusual for a magazine cover. Most magazine covers are professionally done photos that are edited and photoshopped to look flawless however the image of Tsarnaev is raw and taken with a cellphone camera. A selfie is more raw and candid than a …show more content…

Publicly, Tsarnaev is known as a ruthless, heartless, terrorist however in his private life, people have been quoted saying that they had no clue that someone like him could commit such a crime because he was so nice. Nate Mann, a student who was a year older than Tsarnaev in high school said “seriously, he was so, so normal, no accent, an all-American kid in every measurable sense of the word” (Telegraph UK). Rolling Stone was trying to show that everyday side to him because that is what should make us comfortable. According to their statement, Rolling Stone believed that since “Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is young, and in the same age group as many of [their] readers,” there is a need to show that he is not as distant from them as they would like to believe (Rolling Stone’s Facebook Page). By making a private photo public, Rolling Stone enabled the public to close the gap between criminal and citizen so that a more nuanced discussion on the causes of terrorism could occur. How can a criminal have a heart? Terrorists are monsters that are not like the rest of us. The fact of the matter is, Tsarnaev was, at one point, no different from the rest of

Open Document