Analysis Of How David Beats Goliath

770 Words2 Pages

Ability is Nothing in the Presence of Effort Many people question the success of an underdog because it once seemed impossible for them to come out on top. In his article, “How David Beats Goliath,” Malcolm Gladwell addresses the key aspects in the triumphs of the Davids in society. The biblical account of David and Goliath is not considered an anomaly by Gladwell because David’s success could be predicted by the formula of “effort over ability” (2). Gladwell writes this professional magazine article for The New Yorker. Through his writing, Gladwell has developed the face of the outsider in today’s society. In doing so, Time Magazine has “named him one of its ‘100 most influential people’” (The Gladwell Effect, Rachel Donadio). Gladwell has …show more content…

His main points of discussion include, but are not limited to, the importance of effort, the irrelevance of skill, and the tactic of targeting a Goliath’s weakness. Phrases such as “maniacal” and “socially-horrifying” describe the characteristics a David must possess (Gladwell 7, 13). With a tone of inspiration, Gladwell is able to instill in readers the idea that hard work pays off far more than adeptness. The social issue of an underdog’s success in identified in Gladwell’s …show more content…

Gladwell is persistent with the phrase “effort over ability” (4). By reiterating this idea, Gladwell accentuates the significance of one’s effort. Individual talent is not as important. Many instances of underdogs losing, when they do not fight like david, are included to emphasize the result of failure. An underdog will lose to one with superior abilities if he does not fight like david. For example, the Peruvians against the Spanish, and the Burmese against the British are mentioned in the repetition of underdog failures (Gladwell 11). To fight with the methods of David means to contest the norms of society and to prioritize effort. In addition, Gladwell includes George Washington in the Revolutionary War as an example of near failure (11). Gladwell communicates that Washington was nearly defeated because he did not support unconventional warfare (12). Without rejection the normal fighting conventions, an underdog has little chance of

Open Document