More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of pesticides on the environment
Pesticides effects on the environment
Pesticides effects on the environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of pesticides on the environment
In “Hope For Animals And Their World by Jane Goodall,” in her essay, she aims to inform her audience in the way humans' actions are affecting the insects and their environment and how important they are to sustain our ecosystem through the use of literal language. In hopes that her message gets spread to the reader and they understand what is going on with the insect an example she uses is “Unfortunately the weapon of choice from the farmers and gardeners is chemicals such as pesticides which as lead a horrific damage to our ecosystem”. The people using the chemicals are the one most affecting the ecosystem which her point is that we should do something to stop it because using pesticides is not really hurting them, yes it might kill some of
No matter who you are, you are afraid of something. On the other hand, you also have things that you love and are even awestruck by its presence. Goodall describes her encounter with the bushbuck as an amazing sight while her encounter with the leopard was full of fear.
The rhetorical occasion of this excerpt is to inform others about the dangers of chemicals on earth’s vegetation and animal life.
My initial observation was that simple conservation actions such as reducing the use of pesticides can achieve measurable improvements in habitat quality and environmental health. Herbicides are toxic to most mammals as well as to the beneficial insects that you want to encourage in your garden. Sometimes herbicides seep into the ground water; causing contamination of which the long term effects are not known. Herbicide application can also result in drift or movement in the soil, this endangers wanted vegetation nearby. Herbicides are used far too rampantly. Excessive use of toxic herbicides is used when not necessary and because most are not aware of the many other natural alternatives. We must find more ways to cut back on the use of chemical herbicides and change to biological weed control methods.
Human are the most clever animals in the world. As the society developed, they are more concerned to seek for a harmony relationship with nature. The article “In the Forests of the Gombe” written by Jane Goodall describes the relationship of science and religious and the new understanding of humans through the forest. After Goodall’s husband died, she went through the Gombe jungle and found the new world by observing chimpanzees and staying in the quiet forest. Even though there are no communication between Goodall and chimpanzees in the forest, she still gets inner peace and enlightenment of science and religious.
In the passage from Silent Spring, renowned biologist Rachel Carson utilizes rhetorical strategies such as ethos, hyperbole, and understatement to call for an end to the harmful use of pesticides. She uses a tactful combination of hyperboles and understatements, and indicates her authority to speak on the topic by demonstrating appeals to ethos.
As best stated by writer Paul Auster, “the truth of the story lies in the details.” When it comes to novels, the reader must partake in a close reading to get to the nitty gritty of what the author and/or characters of that novel are trying to say. We The Animals, by Justin Torres, is the perfect example of such a novel. There were endless messages throughout the novel linking story lines to one another from beginning to end. However, it is not easy for the reader to understand such details because Torres constantly withholds information from the audience. Torres did not want to easily give up the information; instead he would leave clues for the reader to pick up on. I had to re-read the novel over and over to understand the meanings behind the story. In particular, the chapter “Heritage” caught my attention. This chapter unveiled the true meaning of the word identity to the main characters, also know as the brothers. The
Likewise, in American films like the Lotus, they are used to show the dangers in agriculture when using insecticides and how it makes a super bug that ends up killing humans. These films have many realty’s to them because insecticides in fact do make super-bugs that have a defense against pesticides and grow stronger thus killing the crop and consequentially symbolically the human race no food no living being.
In the article you published called “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin states “Many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined.”. I agree and believe society should be more involved into the way we do things that involves animals. We need to be more aware about the animals and that they have feelings and emotions too and we should not be taking advantage of that. Rifkin stated a lot of good points and arguments. I honestly do not agree we should end all animals deaths, but I do believe there should be an awareness against animal cruelty.
It is estimated that more than 1 million people die annually in the United States from heart disease and cancer combined (Leading Causes of Death). What if all of those human lives could have been saved by sacrificing relatively few animals? Conservationists and animal rights activists always have the best of intentions for animals and the environment. They believe that animals should never have to suffer because of the choices human beings make. This view can be unrealistic in many situations. Jane Goodall’s A Question of Ethics was a very emotional and Rogerian style essay, but I found it lacked the supporting facts and credibility that can be found in Heloisa Sabin’s aggressive “classic” styled essay Animal research Saves Human Lives.
Carson writes with meticulous detail with almost all of her scientific facts and explanations. She compels her readers with keywords and phrases to gravitate her audience towards her side of the argument. Carson gives an example explaining that “in this now universal contamination of the environment, chemicals are the sinister and little-recognized partners of radiation in changing the very nature of the world –the very nature of its life…chemicals sprayed on croplands or forests or gardens lie long in the soil, entering into living organisms, passing from one to another in a chain of poisoning and death”(43). To begin, Carson skillfully argues her point by describing chemicals as “sinister” which grabs her reader’s attention, and presents her evidence comprehensibly so that her variety of readers feel well informed, rather than stunned and confused. Carson could have simply stated that chemicals can transfer from soil to living creatures and save time without disclosure; however, she instead reaches the decision to describe the process with powerful, yet understandable vocabulary that provides emotional appeal in her argument. By presenting scientific evidence and explanations in a compelling and sentimental manner, Carson’s audience is able to connect with her argument. Every fact and description that she gives deems useful in her argument that pesticides should not be used for the treatment of
Silent Spring is one of the most important books of the environmental movement. It was one of the first scientific books to talk about destruction of habitat by humans. As a result, one can imagine that Ms. Rachel Carson needed to be quite persuasive. How does she achieve this? In this excerpt from Silent Spring, Carson utilizes the rhetorical devices of hyperbole, understatement, and rhetorical questions to state the necessity of abolishing the practice of using poisons such as parathion. Carson starts out by using the symbiotic nature of hyperbole and understatement to paint the whole practice as dangerous and unnecessary. She further strengthens her argument by using rhetorical questions to make her readers see the ethical flaws and potential casualties caused by deadly pesticides.
Her audience is anyone who cares about the world we live in and its long term health. “The world we live in” is a vast category, which includes our entire ecosystem as well as animals and humans. The essay also targets producers and users of chemicals and pesticides used for insect and pest control. In “The Obli...
Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring revolutionized the American point of view concerning the environment. It rejected the notion that pesticides and chemicals are the right choice for “controlling” various animals that are seen as an inconvenience. Carson writes about the dangers of pesticides, not only to nature but man himself.
EARLY YEARS In the summer of 1960, a young English woman arrived on the shores of Lake Tanganyika in Tanzania, East Africa. Although it was unheard of for a woman to venture into the wilds of the African forest at that time, going to Africa had bee n Jane Goodall’s childhood dream. As she first surveyed the mountains and valley forests of the Gomb e Stream Chimpanzee Reserve, she had no idea her coming efforts would redefine the relations hip between humans and animals, or that the project would continue into the 21 st century. Encouraged by her mother, Jane Goodall began her life long fascination with animals at an early age.
Jane was born in London, England on April 3, 1934 to father, Mortimer, who was an engineer, and mother, Vanne, who was an author (“Jane Goodall”). She was raised in a big house on the ocean near Bournemouth, England- about 100 miles outside London- living with her parents, sister, and two aunts (“Jane Goodall”). Jane expressed her admiration for animals at a very young age, treasuring stuffed animals given to her as a toddler. Inspired by Doctor Dolittle books, written by Hugh Lofting, they just the beginning of Jane’s dreams of helping and protecting animals. When she was just four years old, her parents reported Jane missing, only to be discovered hours later in a nearby henhouse, where she was observing the hens, to see how they laid their eggs (“Jane Goodall Biography”). This could certainly be the origin of Goodall’s inspiration to become a biologist. In 1954, when Jane completed high school, she couldn’t afford to attend university. After a family friend invited her for a visit in Africa in 1957, however, that all changed; some of Jane’s work in Gombe with other scientist and chimpanzees became very popular and she was accepted to Cambridge University as a Ph.D. candidate (“Jane Goodall Biography”). She was one of an extremely short list of people at the time to get into the school without a university degree (“The Evolution of Jane Goodall”). Jane returned to England to attend on the advice of Louis Leaky, anthropologist and friend to Goodall, and earned a doctorate on ethology, which is the science of animal behavior (“Dame Jane