Analysis Of George Orwell 's ' Shooting An Elephant '

760 Words4 Pages
In the essay, "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell, the narrative includes almost no dialogue. Orwell 's voice as narrator is the only one readers hear. Orwell appears to have needed to empathize the inner conflict experienced by the narrator, who does not really want to shoot the elephant but feels compelled to do so to "avoid looking a fool." Ultimately, the requests and rationale of the government constrain individuals to act against their own ethical compasses. The absence of a dialogue is to emphasize the internal conflict experienced by the narrator. By shooting the elephant, the narrator becomes what the Burmese individuals expect him to be—a killer. The audience is able to view the incident through his eyes, seeing that he wouldn 't at last like to act along these lines; however, he openly recognizes that he detests the Burmese. The narrator 's point of view and absence of conversing with the Burmese individuals causes the readers to view the provincial people groups as basically faceless and one-dimensional. They are a furious, baying crowd whom the storyteller sees with disdain and all around trepidation. The biased view of the narrators neglects the Burmese individuals of any distinction. The whole nature of the exposition is set when Orwell depicts the setting to be a "cloudy, stuffy morning at the beginnings of the rains." The tone of Orwell 's speech is meant to be feeble and discomforting. He, as of now, has built projects and projects himself through the character as feeble when he presents the Burma individuals and how they snicker and taunt him, the British officer. The development of finding the elephant is an analogy itself demonstrating the ruinous force of colonialism: the elephant 's rampaging spree... ... middle of paper ... ...e Orwell 's "Shooting An Elephant" combines individual experience and political view. George Orwell uses his personal experience with a moral dilemma to convey to the reader the evils which result from colonial politics and imperialism. He blends his own personal thoughts and opinion into his story. The moves he makes amongst portrayal and the genuine story is so unpretentious the stream of the exposition is anything but difficult to peruse. Strong convictions do not fall prey to the masses. More than simply falling into companion weight, Orwell broadcasts what an issue it is when individuals anticipate that gatherings of individuals will do certain things and do certain activities. People can be affected so effortlessly. Written during the 1930s, Orwell 's essay, "Shooting an Elephant," demonstrates how the impacts of Imperialism harms both sides through his voice.
Open Document