Introduction Market transactions are precipitated by differences in information and incentives among market players. Crowdfunding as a form of market transaction is similarly driven by asymmetries in information and incentives. This essay carries out an economic analysis of crowdfunding focusing mainly on the effects of information and incentives factors on the crowdfunding. I observe that despite information asymmetry and conflicting players’ incentives, crowdfunding market players will pursue their joint interests to maximize value find equilibrium to maximize their welfare. In support of this observation, I address the main concerns with crowdfunding and detail the market mechanisms that mitigate these concerns. I also conclude that, whereas …show more content…
By utilizing the Internet, crowdfunding has a bigger reach than the traditional channels of raising funds, which are often geographically constrained. The use of online platform eases and reduces the cost of matching investors and entrepreneurs due to low communication costs (though far from being effective). For crowd-funders, crowdfunding offers access to additional investment opportunities. The risk exposure is often low due to the small amounts involved. The broad categories of crowdfunding are debt crowdfunding, equity crowdfunding, crowdfunding donations and rewards-based crowdfunding. This essay will focus mainly on the equity and debt crowdfunding categories due to their significance in economic analysis. Adverse Selection, Moral Hazard and Information Cascade in …show more content…
As more entrepreneurs opt for crowdfunding to raise capital, competition for investor funds increases. To outdo each other, entrepreneurs will be incentivized to strengthen the quality of signal to investors through the platform. Such signals will include, offering exit options for investors, taking up a stake in the project to portray investor confidence, having in place competent and experienced management teams and seeking external certification by affiliating themselves with reputable third parties such a venture capitalists. On the other hand, the need by the platform to signal quality to attract future investor confidence will incentivize due diligence and vetting of project wishing to list on the specific platform to weed out fraudulent projects. This will resolve the adverse selection concern highlighted
Incentives create a personal connection between the donator and what they are giving to, making it more likely that they will donate. Peter Singer, a moral philosopher, uses the example of a drowning child. Pretend that you are taking a walk and see a young child, who clearly doesn’t know how to swim, trying to
... Crowdfunding is based on quality and innovation, not on profit. A project needs to catch enough interest in order to be realized. This forces innovative architectural concepts. Conclusion The new mechanism = the crowd instead of the old centralized organizations plus the new driver = the quality instead of profit eventually leads to a new highly participatory society redefining our own relationship to the environment.
This chapter's main idea is that the study of economics is the study of incentives. We find a differentiation between economic incentives, social incentives and moral incentives. Incentives are described in a funny way as "means of urging people to do more of a good thing or less of a bad thing", and in this chapter we find some examples public school teachers in Chicago, sumo wrestling in Japan, take care center in Israel and Paul Feldman's bagel business of how incentives drive people and most of the time the conventional wisdom turns to be "wrong" when incentives are in place.
Debra Satz, in “Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale”, argues for a more complex approach in market regulation, as some markets are more problematic than others. While economists tend to evaluate exchanges based only on proficiency (Satz 2010, p2), Satz considers the social context of individual practices in market relationships. In Staz proposed theory, there are four parameters of a market that can make it “noxious”. Noxious in this case meaning the effect of the market causes harmful consequences on society or persons involved. First, some markets may be reliant on the vulnerability of one party to trade. Second, some markets may have exceedingly bad consequences, in terms of welfare or status, for persons involved. Third, some markets may be one-sidedness because of insufficient information, knowledge, or ability to understand or forecast the consequences of an arrangement. Fourth, some markets may have bad consequences for society at large when they reinforce discrimination or inequality of status. For example markets that are considered noxious due to one or more parameters being present in their sale are child labor, prostitution and kidney exchange.
Singer’s argument may have swayed many people to donate their dispensable income to children in need despite the fact that it has many fundamental flaws. He argues that we should give away the majority of our earnings to charity. Since Singer wants the reader to donate such a large amount of money, the readers are given no choice but to contribute nothing whatsoever. His solution is not realistic and does not take into account the long-term financial impact this type of donation contribution system would have on a country’s economy.
Businesses face lots of challenges today during their development and growth, and they should decide how much financial investment are they want to put into the development of certain projects.
Analysis of an Advertising Campaign We are swarmed by advertising. Companies constantly battle to compete for the sale of their product. Adverts appear in every form of media including radio; television; Internet; billboards; newspaper; flyers and magazines. The advertiser wants us to buy their product above their competitors. The basic aim of advertising is to convince the target audience that their product is the best in the field and superior to the other products of similarity.
The case study is about an interview, conducted to four venture capitalists from four of the most prominent VC Silicon Valley firms, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers (KPCB), Menlo Ventures, Trinity Ventures and Alta Partners. These firms invest both in seed as well as in later-stage companies, which operate mostly in the information technology sector. However, each VC has developed different sector portfolio depending on the expertise of the venture capitalists, the partner network and other factors. Professor Mike Roberts and Lauren Barley a senior research associate, both from Harvard Business School, have made a series of seven questions to their interviewees to understand how they evaluate potential venture opportunities and what they look at in order to decide if they will fund them and in which way. The questions were dealing with how VC’s evaluate potential venture opportunities, how they conduct due diligence, what process id followed for the decision making, what financial analyses is performed, the role of risk in the evaluation and how they think of potential exit routes. These questions were asked individually and revealed several similarities as well as differences in the strategy and the criteria that are used for the evaluation.
Debt financing has both advantages and disadvantages. Debt financing is a business’ way to start up, expand, or recover by borrowing money from a preson or company. The money borrowed has to be paid back along with the interest that was accrued during the length of time the loan was carried out. This option is great for company’s that do not want investors. Debt financing is beneficial because the loaners do not often get involved with the company or any decision making within the company. The downfall is the risk that is assumed with the debt which is, the company may not be able to pay back the loaner. In that case, the loaner would go after the owner or partner personally. There are many forms of debt a company is allowed to take on, such as ‘venture’ debt, even if they are a high-risk corporation. ‘Venture’ debt is a form of senior debt ...
Adelman, P. J., & Marks, A. M. (2010). Entrepreneurial finance. (5 ed.). Bedford, Texas: Prentice Hall.
However, it is deniable that incentives deliver the expected results all the time. Incentives do not always achieve its’ goals. This essay argues about the flaws in incentives due to the nature of incentives itself, discusses the effect of incentives that encourage cheating and the result of an ineffective incentive given the circumstances. Before scrutinizing the effectiveness of an incentive, it is fundamental to understand the nature of the incentive itself. According to the Freakonomics, incentives are essentially divided into three aspects: social, moral and economic.
Micro-loaning is designed to break the cycle of poverty by allowing low income residents access to outside funds, which they were previously restricted from. These funds give the opportunity to participate in investments, such as small businesses, and create a steady flow of income. Micro-loaning provides financial services for those who might have low or no income, as well as not having the official documents required when applying for a regular loan. With the goal of low interest and easy application, micro-loaning appears to the most efficient, alternative way of alleviating poverty. To help gain a better understanding of micro-loaning; we will explore the micro-finance history and its organization, poverty and the target subject of this organization, and the benefits and backfires of providing these services.
Analyzing in terms of investment, if a private investor puts money into a company he has an expectation of both risk and return on the investment. Given a particular level of risk, the investment needs to be expected to have a particular level of return. For example, investment in a start-up needs to have the potential for a very high return, given the higher risk of failure, while investment in a large established business can be coupled with a lower expected return, given the lower risk of failure.
Microcredit can be defined as small loans, or microloans, for people around the world in extreme poverty to help spur entrepreneurship. The issue of microcredit is extremely important in the world’s economy. Poverty alleviation and economic development are the primary goals of microcredit programs, that is why they began in the developing countries of Asia and Latin America, economist Muhammad Yunus and his Grameen Bank in Bangladesh are credited of pioneering this financial innovation (Smith, Thurman, 2007). After acquiring a loan, impoverished people get involved in self-employment projects that help them to start a business and begin generating income and in many cases leave poverty. Microcredit offers loans to poor people without requesting any financial history from them. These loans help to improve the quality of life of individuals and communities through commitment. In recent years, the idea of giving small loans to poor people became the darling of the development world, giving a way to propel even the poorest people into better lives (Jolis, 2011).
Studying Banking and Finance at University of St.Gallen will help me further increase my proficiency in corporate finance and financial markets. The in-depth research of specific topics, as well as a comprehensive curriculum, is a possibility for me to focus on my topic of interest – the mechanisms and institutions involved in providing venture capital and identifying angel investors as means to encourage innovation.... ... middle of paper ... ...