Analysis Of Critique Of Neuromancer

1970 Words4 Pages

The purpose of English 111 is to help students create a foundation of writing skills so that they may better succeed at UW through their understanding of writing and how they can improve their writing skills. In order to achieve this goal students are expected to write essays throughout the course that will help them become more proficient in the four Course Goals set up to guide students in their learning process. The first course goal is that students be able to recognize strategies employed by writers in different forms of literary works. Students practice this skill through the reading and discussion of many different forms of literature in order to learn how writing strategies are used throughout these texts. The second course goal is …show more content…

This goal represents a writers ability to adapt to different areas of writing so I chose an essay where I was meant to write from the perspective that the essay was on a book review website. The purpose of the essay was to provide a summary of the book Neuromancer and describe how we reacted to it. Instead of writing a completely academic paper, this essay represents that even in an informal environment I am still capable of producing academic quality text. Such as, while it was unnecessary to quote the book I was still able to embed the information into my own argument and sentence without changing the flow of the paper using the quote giving Gibson’s description of Neuromancer eyes as “eggs of unstable crystals, vibrating with the frequency whose name was the rain and the sound of trains, suddenly sprouting a forest of hair-fine glass spines.” While the quote is quite lengthy and can easily control the flow of the sentence I was able to weave it into my own sentence. Instead of shortening the quote in order to make this challenge easier I decided to use the full sentence so that the effect of description can fully affect the audience. This represents the fact that I am capable of writing in different scenarios, and to different audiences, while maintaining my academic merit within my papers. The Critique of Neuromancer Book review helped to present my understanding of the first course outcome through my academic tone in a non-academic

Open Document