Escape Of Freedom Essay

The book ‘Escape of Freedom’ clearly encapsulates the notion of the human being when they get emancipated from the bondage of submission and becomes free.

In the book ‘Clinical Erich Fromm’ the author gives an example; while diagnosing a patient he was distracted and angered by the fact that the patient often came very late to the sessions. Upon consulting about this issue with Fromm, he suggested that the true diagnosis of the patient can be done only when the author would investigate the reason behind the delay and not let the same bias his diagnosis of the patient. In conclusion one cannot resolve the problems of another individual unless he truly knows him.

As Management students, we see a direct correlation with the above concepts. In

May be a "voice crying in the wilderness", but only if that voice remains lively and uncompromising, it is possible to transform the desert into fertile land. The same theory also applies in the corporate world. In the leadership position while formulating the road map of the organization and while maneuvering the strategies in the right direction we should always keep in mind those factors which should have a direct correlation with the outcome in the future. It often happens that great leaders often commit the mistake of predicting the future prospects in advance and consequently it affects the revenue and profit of the organization. Hence vision is necessary for every leader at every spectrum of any organization or the industry. The vision should take the sociological, political, economic, international relations, cultural intercepts into consideration so that all the expected negative obstacles and be sorted out and the unexpected issues can be tackled with full justification at least. In this book, Erich rightly mentions that “The value judgments we make determine our actions, and upon their validity rests our mental health and

The process of learning any practice in the organization can be divided conveniently into two parts: one, the mastery of the theory; the other, the mastery of the practice. If we want to learn the tactics to formulate strategy, we must first know the facts about the best organizational practices, and about various issues an organization faces in adversity. When we have all this theoretical knowledge, we are by no means competent in the art of formulation of strategy. We shall become a master in this art only after a great deal of practice, until eventually the results of our theoretical knowledge and the results of my practice are blended into one — our intuition, the essence of the mastery of any practice. But, aside from learning the theory and practice, there is a third factor necessary to becoming a master in any discipline — the mastery of the art must be a matter of ultimate concern; there must be nothing else in the world more important than the art. This holds true for other field like polity, sociology and economics. And, maybe, here lies the answer to the question of why people in our culture try so rarely to learn this art, in spite of their obvious failures: in spite of the deep-seated craving for love, almost everything else is considered to be more important than love: success,