Eye for an Eye
“You must pay for everything in this world one way and another. There is nothing free except the Grace of God. You can’t earn that or deserve it” (Portis 40.) Everything you do, good or bad, carries some sort of judgment from the Lord. You might slip through the cracks from this world judgments and law, but you will be judged according to your doings, in this world by God. You can’t earn nor deserve the Grace of the Lord, because it was already given to us in the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ. “Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification” (Romans 4:25.) This gave us Grace to be forgiven after our sin if we repent from further sinning’s. This means you can’t go and commit a crime of revenge, knowing
…show more content…
Mattie Ross believed she is a “good Christian” (Portis 92) but she is just as callous as Tom Chaney’s soul. “The wicked flee when none purseth” (Portis 17), the wicked is always looking back and are jumpy because they know deep down; they’re in judgment of some sort. She takes the law and justice into her own hands, to pursue her father’s murder and unaware that the little devil is holding her hand into the darkness. Mattie’s Christian ways are deceived by the misinterpretation of the bible passages in the Old Testament “eye for [an] eye” (Exodus 21:24) to fit her avenge to seek blood from the man who is hardened in heart with no sympathy for his actions. This was the beginning of Gods will and redemption in Mattie’s life of a sinful …show more content…
19:20-21, Lev. 24:19-20) and feels entitled to “the law of retaliation” (Wiki. 2015) to do harm to Tom Chaney, no matter the consequences’ that will fall upon her from sin. “The eye that now sees me will see no longer: you will look for me, but I will be no more” (Job 7:8) God mention this to the people who seem to walk by faith, but are quick to take avenges from others who have harmed them. Mattie has no such power to complete Gods will for Chaney. Mattie has no fear of what waits upon her from Gods judgment towards her sin nor does she care for God’s eternal truth for “Amazing Grace” (Portis
How many times do different people come together for one equal cause? In quest stories, such as True Grit by Charles Portis. All three main characters put their differences aside, and team up for one cause, which is to get Tom Chaney, dead or alive. Mattie Ross, the hero, Rooster Cogburn, the wise old man, and LeBoeuf, the helper guide, all make up the essential characters for any good quest story.
Charles Portis’s famous novel True grit published in 1968 was the basis of both the 1969 and the 2010 movie. The 2010 movie by the Coen Brothers covers a lot of stuff from the book, but I think they made the character Mattie a lot different then the book. In the book Mattie was a 14 teen year old girl who wasn't afraid of anything, and was not afraid to take revenge on her fathers killer Tom Chaney. Some of events in the movie made her look tough but the actor was too nice and cute to play Mattie. They also made her way more emotional than in the book. Even though they covered most of the events of the book I still don't like the way they made the movie.
Guilt and sin are dominant themes in the mind of young Luke Chandler. He notes, “As Baptist, we were never short on sins to haunt us” (Grisham 60). “Most things were sinful in rural Arkansas, especially if you were a Baptist” (Grisham 83) according to Luke. This pervasiveness of sin created a guilt complex that nagged the youngest Chandler. When he lies to officer Stick Powers, Luke was certain that he was “skirting around the edges of the fiery depths” even while he was fabricating a justification for his sinful actions (Grisham 100). After watching Tally Spruill bathing in the river, Luke felt uncertainty as to how sinful his act had been, although he could not recall any direct Scriptural prohibition (Grisham 128). Even at times when it was questionable as to whether he had done anything wrong, Luke would feel “guilty of something” (Grisham
Punishment/Capital Punishment and the Christian attitude towards it has been a topic that has been and still is being debated today. Punishment, but in particular, Capital Punishment, is a complicated topic to discuss, especially when it comes to Christian attitudes and the ethics towards it. The purpose of this report is for people to have a better understanding of what this Christian attitude is or what these Christian attitudes are towards Punishment/Capital Punishment in relation to Christian ethics. In this report, you will learn about the history of capital punishment, the different Christian groups against Capital Punishment and what the Bible says about it as well, all in relation to Christian ethics.
It is important to note that retribution (i.e. justice) is not the same thing as revenge or vengeance. Retributive justice is meant as an act by society to correct a harm done against society, in this case murder, whereas revenge or vengeance is an individual act to right a wrong done by one individual against another.
“To me if there’s an achievement to lighting and photography in a film, it’s because nothing in the film stands out, it all works as a piece.” (Roger Deakins, cinematographer of True Grit) In the 2010 adaptation of Charles Portis’ novel, True Grit, the directors, Ethan and Joel Coen, and Roger Deakins display the beauty of cinematography within the movie. And although the film was nominated for ten Academy Awards, it did not win any! It most certainly deserves to win based on the film’s use of editing, camera movement and framing, and lighting and sound.
In each specific section, people are punished for one sin in the same manner. This does not compensate for the severity of the sin itself. The people are punished in the same manner, despite the severity of their sin, such as thievery. For example, those who committed thievery are condemned to a pit of serpents, as Dante describes, "Serpents—of weird kinds….people were running, naked and terrified, without a hope of hiding or a chance at heliotrope for safety," (Dante, 201). All of the thieves are tortured by the same serpents in the same way. None are punished more severely if they had robbed a poor family to buy a new car, as opposed to stealing a loaf of bread to feed a family. This is an example of why a more personal model is needed, so that people can be punished according to the severity of their sin, as opposed to just the sin itself.
consequences of sin. Paul confirms this in Romans 3:10, “There is none righteous, no not one.”
If we look at the beliefs of Christianity, its subjects believe that God will see something that is frowned upon thus closing their chance at heaven upon becoming deceased, or even lead to certain consequences in the near future known as karma. Though it is not proven that there is a heaven or God, many hold strong to their beliefs on the subject, though they cannot see said upper hand.. Due to the belief that God is watching, his believers know that committing sin (such as adultery and wrath) is such a move that could potentially be “frowned upon.” However, they also have the choice of going to confe...
I said in mine heart, God shall judge the righteous and the wicked; for there is a time for every purpose and for every work (Ec. 17). Morrison draws a sympathetic picture of Cholly. She blurs the reality and covers him with emotional longing for the love he knew in the past. Cholly has nothing more to lose. His life is a tragedy.
There was a man by the name of Thomas of Elderfield who had a life full of ups and downs, but who never lost his faith in Christianity. He came from a poor family and worked his way up the social ladder to a successful business man. This climb up the social ladder was beneficial to him, but soon led to trouble as he attracted a suitor. After several years of infidelity with the suitor, Thomas’s conscious got to him and he discontinued seeing the married woman. His faith in God kept him from returning to her despite her repeated attempts at pulling him into sin. Thomas could not live with the weight of the sin on his shoulders so he went to a priest to confess what was causing him anguish and repent for his sins. “Eventually God's grace intervened and remorse stung him; so he presented himself to a priest and took his healthy advice to do proper penance for his offence,” (Malmesbury, par. 2). The woman remarried a man named George years after her first husband had passed away. In time George found out about his new wife’s previous infidelity...
In the bible it is said that we should treat others as we would like to be treated, and when I would hurt someone physically or mentally I would be disobeying what the bible said. If I am to get revenge on others, what happens when they get revenge on me, will it ever stop or would it have been easier to just walk away and no say anything or let it bothered me. Now that I’m in college I feel that revenge comes in different forms. Now instead of hurting others I am in for taking revenge on the basketball floor.
Punishment is reserved to those who have committed a transgression, a dominant and common response to injustices upon a victim (Okimoto and Weznzel 2008 p.346). It is a sense of retribution against immoral behavior, not solely for the purpose of punishment against the offender, but
The story also presents another facts of the Christian belief about sin and punishment, which is based on the strict principles of repentance and forgiveness.
The way God punished Satan seems like the most evident thing to do, but the way He punished Adam and Eve for eating from the tree can be questioned and seen as harsh and unfair, but it shouldn’t b...