Summary Of Women In War By Carol Cohn

744 Words2 Pages

The purpose of Carol Cohn’s article “Women in War” is to explain why women have been kept out of the subject of war although they have played many vital roles. Cohn argues, that because of the gender coding of characteristics, institutions such as the military have been established in such a way that not only rejects characteristics of femininity but also preserves masculinity. Cohn employs logic, fact and the reasoning of experts in their own respective fields to answer why there is such a separation between the military and women.
Cohn begins her argument by introducing the initial separation of women and the military through gender coding. Cohn defines gender coding as “a set way of thinking” which dictates what we consider to be feminine and what is masculine. Cohn relates these gender codes back to the separation between women and war in that war is …show more content…

War, according to Cohn, “is symbolically and practically linked to the norms of masculinity” thereby establishing all things military and war related to be primarily masculine. The central point in Con’s argument is that the military suppresses femininity while preserving masculinity. She explains that although women have played immense roles in war efforts they are not recognized for the sake of keeping the military masculine. While war is seen mostly as masculine, Cohn counter argues that point by explaining that “the actual activities soldiers engage in would be culturally coded as ‘feminine’ were they not taking place within an institution which is itself coded hyper-masculine”. Cohn concretely concludes her argument with evidence from former U.S. Marine Corps General Robert H. Barrow who said “war is a man’s work… [women in the front lines would] trample the male ego…you have to protect the manliness of war.” By using the expert opinion of a Marine Corps General as evidence, Cohn justifies her argument concisely and

Open Document