Analysis Of Carl Jung's 'No Boundary'

992 Words2 Pages

“Everyone carries a shadow, and the less it is embodied in the individual's conscious life, the blacker and denser it is.” That was what Carl Jung, a Swiss psychiatrist and the founder of analytical psychology, once stated. That was also the main idea of this part of the course; it was important to become aware of the existence of the persona, the accepted side of the personality, and the shadow, the denied side of the personality, and how they together form the ego, the Self. The article “No Boundary” was the major highlight of the recent classes, and the boundary here actually refers to the separation between the persona and the shadow, the denial of the existence of the shadow which causes the “shadow projection,” a major concept in psychology, …show more content…

The example of Jack who wanted to clean the garage and, when he goes there, forgets his drive and moves it to the shadow, shows why many addicts fail to stop the addiction. When someone decides to give up an addicted habit, whatever that habit is, they’re, at some point, really honest and serious about it. However, what happens later is that that drive gets denied and they get “weak” when the chance to do the addicted habit is there; just like when Jack starts wasting time; that’s why they actually feel guilty or angry when someone mentions it afterwards; that’s the effect of the projected original desire. The only difference is just that some types of addictions are, in part, biological. Furthermore, there’s also a famous Egyptian saying that translates to “are you now going to let it out on me?” This is said when someone gets angry at someone for no real reason, just like when Jack gets angry at his wife believing she pressures him; the saying corresponds closely to shadow projection since the person who gets angry is literally letting out/projecting a shadow

Open Document