Analysis Of Anthony Doerr's All The Light We Cannot See

1224 Words3 Pages

In this passage, an excerpt from Anthony Doerr’s novel, All the Light We Cannot See, Doerr depicts Werner, an orphan German boy, visiting Frederick’s house, whom he had met in Schulpforta, an elite Nazi academy. Through the experiences Werner has with Frederick’s family in Berlin, Doerr emphasizes Werner’s discomfort towards Frederick’s relationship with his mother to convey the corrupt nature of parental love may harm the child. Werner gets uncomfortable when Frederick’s does not face the problem. “She applies powder beneath Frederick’s eyes” to cover up the bruise before leaving to a bistro (Doerr 4). Although Frederick is struggling and suffering from the violence in Schulpforta, as it can be seen from the bruises covering his face, Frederick’s …show more content…

On their way back to Frederick’s house, Werner watches “[Frederick’s mother looping] her slender arm through his” and talking to him, while referring to him by his nickname, “Fredde” (26-28). Linking arms and referring to a person’s nickname are discernible signs of kinship. Thus, by having them engage in following action, Doerr depicts an image of an idealistic relationship between a son and a mother. Yet, Werner senses the hollowness within the apparent love. He perceives “The street [to be] empty, the windows [to be] dead, the electric signs [to be switched off]” and questions the emptiness when there were “ innumerable shops, millions sleeping in beds around them” when he follows the footsteps of them (28-29). Through such depiction, Doerr shows the abnormality in the relationship between Frederick and his mother. Although they are surrounded by multitudes of acts of family love, in reality, they are bare from lack of the warmth, driven by the authentic familiar love, which is illustrated metaphorically with the imagery of the barren street. Since Werner realizes the fraudulence of the relationship, he feels repulsed by it. The bond between parent and its child is a natural phenomenon, that exists for all animals and humans. Therefore, Frederick’s mother hindering this natural and sacred relationship is conceived as a disturbing event, even to Werner who is foreign to this concept. The revulsion he feels is further portrayed through “a woman in a dress ... [vomiting] on the sidewalk” (31-32). Vomit is a primal proof for disgust as it is a symptom that accompanies nausea and looks vile. Thus, having the woman throw up stands for the repugnance Werner feels for the fictitious family love and the nausea that comes from realizing the natural law can be broken. This again returns back to the notion of the corrupt love of the

Open Document