preview

Analysis Of Abortion And The Politics Of Motherhood By Kristen Luker

analytical Essay
837 words
837 words
bookmark

Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood by Kristen Luker, analyzes the historical and complex sociology of abortion. Luker focuses on three important factors: a historical overview of abortion, the pro-life and pro-choice views, and the direction the abortion debates are going (11, Luker, Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood p. 000). Abortion has always been seen as murder and with the idea that those who are already living have more rights. Back in the days, the laws didn’t give fetus personhood. Also, the laws against abortions weren’t strictly enforced upon anyone. In addition, abortion didn’t seem to be a huge problem, which explains why abortion was ignored in the past. Oddly, physicians brought abortion into the public’s eye. These physicians formed a pro-life movement arguing the moral knowledge that the public didn’t seem to have (12, Luker, Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood p. 000). According to the source, women didn’t understand that the embryo is a living being. With their lack of knowledge about things, they came “murderesses” and the only way this could be solved was to outlaw abortion. They kept the idea that abortion was murder, but, at the same time, they also said that only they could decide when an abortion should occur. With their accomplishment, in 1900, every state had a law that stated that abortion is illegal except for when the mother’s life is in danger. But the weakness of this was that the law didn’t specifically define the danger a mother should be in. Politics and society changed in a way that turned abortion debated from a medical debate to a public discussion. Luker then argues that the attitude for abortion range to work, religion, children and families. This then became impossible for p... ... middle of paper ... ...these flaws sets new proposal to new opportunities to everyone. To a certain degree, American society supports motherhood in ways where it is effective to the problems. It is apparent that there are times where they aren’t providing people the right resources. It seems like less people have the proper help, which explains the amount of limitations we are being set to. The topic on abortion gives a moral objection to a fetus’ right to life, while it is questionable whether or not the death of the unborn child is unjustifiable. Although it may seem as if abortion puts women in situations where it is necessary to save the mother’s life in some situations. Until both pro-life and pro-choice can come to a conclusion and an agreement, this debates on abortion will continually go on. Both sides need to be able to draw the line somewhere and balance each other’s weakness.

In this essay, the author

  • Analyzes kristen luker's "abortion and the politics of motherhood" to analyze the historical and complex sociology of abortion.
  • Analyzes how physicians brought abortion into the public's eye and formed a pro-life movement arguing the moral knowledge they didn't seem to have.
  • Analyzes how luker argues that the attitude for abortion ranges to work, religion, children and families, making it difficult for pro-choice and prolife to have a mutual agreement about the values of abortion.
  • Analyzes luker's thoughts about teen pregnancy, stating that poor mothers drain the society’s resources by making the wrong life choices.
  • Analyzes how luker conducts on both sides on the issue of abortion, arguing that abortion ranges from different core values.
  • Analyzes luker's sociological account of the underlying cultural motivations. teens have responsibilities that lead to society’s failure.
  • Analyzes how luker's account has been both weakening and expanding the power of ethical rezoning to generate moral insights concerning the ethics of abortion.
  • Opines that abortion gives a moral objection to the fetus’ right to life, while it is questionable whether or not the death of the unborn child is unjustifiable.
Get Access