An Overview of the Main Causes for Misidentification of English Language Learners for Special Education Services under a Learning Disabilit

1386 Words3 Pages

Data gathered from the American Community Survey (ACS) report in 2007 on the percentage of U.S. population, age 5 and over, relates that out of 281 million people, 55.4 million are speaking a language other than English at home. This segment of population constitutes over 24% and it has increased from 1980 to 2007 more than 140%. Out of the 55.4 million people whose primary language is other than English, 62% are Spanish language speakers, founding the largest group of foreign language speakers in the United States (Shin & Kominski, 2010). According to the National Center for Education Statistics (2012) in United States’ public schools, English Language Learners (ELL), formally known as Limited English Proficient (LEP) is the fasted growing student population. Between 2009 and 2010, approximately 10% or 4.7 million students enrolled in public schools were ELLs. School districts data from 2000-2001 reported about 9.2% of the ELLs were served in Special Education, compared with 13.5% of all students in special education, the highest percentage of students being classified with learning disabilities (Zehler, Fleischman, Hopstock, Stephenson, Pendzick, & Sapru, 2003). Sullivan (2011), who analyzed the disproportionality in the identification and placement in special education of ELLs, has also indicated an increased overrepresentation in special education, especially under the category of specific learning disability (SLD). Moreover, other studies have shown a higher proportion of ELL students overrepresented in special education starting third grade or higher, compared with ELL students from lower grades who were underrepresented in special education (Artiles, Rueda, Salazar, & Higareda, 2005; Samson & Lesaux, 2009). Causes for mis... ... middle of paper ... ... made in regard to differences and similarities between LD and language acquisition. When teachers and professionals form a base of knowledge about the second language acquisition process and they develop understanding of the characteristics associated with learning disabilities, it increases the likelihood that effective interventions are employed for ELL students with or without LD. Lack of effective instructions, lack of opportunities for learning, and limited English proficiency should not be a decisive factor when making eligibility determination (Chu & Flores, 2011). Special education determination should be rather based on data supported evidence and alternative assessments scores, which show that, in spite of the instructions in English as a second language as a second (ESL) or bilingual programs used, the ELL students do require more intensive instruction.

More about An Overview of the Main Causes for Misidentification of English Language Learners for Special Education Services under a Learning Disabilit

Open Document