An Argument For Animal Research

An Argument For Animal Research

Medicine has come a very long way since the days when men used to puncture

holes into the skull to release tension or evil spirits. In the last one

hundred years, for the sake of humanity, numerous vaccinations have been

developed, disease and disorders of all types have been prevented, surgical

techniques have been advanced, drugs have been developed to cure ailments and

the list continues endlessly. The progress that has been achieved in knowledge

as well as safety in medical practice is correlated directly to animal research.

It is one argument to control animal research so that needless death of animals

are not rendered, but it is absolutely different to argue that animals have

rights which supersede human subsistence. "For most of the past decade, the

animal-rights movement hasn't merely opposed animal research; it has

tried to destroy it." ( ¯The Wall Street Journal®, "Animals and Sickness", Page

378.) Animal rights advocates and activists generally have ethical objections

regarding treatment of animals during experimentation, but the use of animals in

research for the benefit of all people is and always will be justifiable.

Over 99 percent of all animal experiments are on rats and mice developed

expressly for laboratory use. "Less than 1 percent of experiments involve cats,

dogs, farm animals, nonhuman primates, frogs, fish, and birds." ( ¯Encyclopedia

of Medicine, AMA®, "Animal Experimentation", Page 110.) Animal rights advocates

try to sway public opinion by showing grotesque pictures of destroyed cats, dogs,

farm animals, dolphins, and monkeys which account for less than 1 percent of the

experiments, yet it seems 99 percent of their advertising and campaigning deal

with this one percent. At least the American public realizes even those who

portray ethical righteousness can be wrong. For instance, " an American Medical

Association ( AMA ) poll found that 77 percent of adults think that using

animals in medical research is necessary." ( ¯The Wall Street Journal®, "Animals

and Sickness", Page 378.)

It is a curious thing to see animal welfare groups try to hinder animal

research by threatening researchers lives and destroying years of data collected.

Animal rights groups are promoting even more animal testing because the same

tests will have to be repeated to replace the lost data. In every major medical

research university there have been some form of nuisance to deter animal

testing whether it was a quiet riot or endangering the lives of researchers.

Animal rights groups must realize research is done out of necessity for

human welfare. Whenever possible alternatives to animal experiments are used.

"The development of modern research techniques, such as CAT scans, PET scans,