Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyze the history of the war on drugs
Analyze the history of the war on drugs
Analyze the history of the war on drugs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analyze the history of the war on drugs
The War on Drugs, like the war on Terrorism, is a war that America may not be able to afford to win. For over forty years the United States has been fighting the War on Drugs and there is no end in sight. It has turned into a war that is about politics and economics rather than about drugs and criminals. The victims of this war are numerous; but perhaps they are not as numerous as those who benefit from the war itself.
History of U.S Drug Policy:
While laws prohibiting the use of drugs, in one form or another, can be traced back to the 1870s, it was not until 1968, when Richard M. Nixon was elected President, that our current drug war was conceived. In 1970 Congress passed the Comprehensive Drug Abuse and Control Act.(2) With an emphasis on law enforcement, the act replaced and updated all previous laws concerning narcotics and other drugs. When Nixon officially declared the “War on Drugs” in 1971, his administration claimed that heroin use was responsible for 18 billion dollars in property crime a year and that there were upwards of 315,000 addicts in the United States. (2)
These figures helped garner support for the new drug war but in reality they were greatly inflated. In fact, the total of all property crime in the United States in 1971 was 1.3 billion dollars and the estimated number of heroin addicts was somewhere around 68,000.(2) Despite these facts, Nixon’s drug war took hold in the public imagination. This allowed Nixon enough freedom with law enforcement that he was able to create his own agency. On January 28, 1972 under Executive Order 11641, the Office of Drug Abuse Law Enforcement was established.(14) Headed by John Ehrlichman and Egil Krogh, this agency would be short lived but would serve as Nixon’s own pr...
... middle of paper ...
....sentencingproject.com
12. The Rand Corporation, Are Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences Cost-Effective?,
www.rand.org
13. Johnson, Joan J., “America’s War on Drugs,” Franklin Watts/New York/
London/Toronto/Sydney (1990)
14. Duke, Steven B., & Gross, Albert C., “America’s Longest War: Rethinking Our Tragic Crusade Against Drugs,” G.P. Putnam and Sons (1993)
15. U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, www.usdoj.gov/dea/
16. Susan Brumbaugh, Ph.D., Ameila Rouse, Ph.D., and Chris Birkbeck, Ph.D., An Estimation of
Drug-Related Criminal Justice Costs in New Mexico, 1997, www.unm.edu/~isrnet/
17. U.S Congress, Hearings on Federal Drug Enforcement before the Senate Committee on
Investigations, 1975 and 1976 (1976); Office of National Drug Control Policy, National
Drug Control Strategy, 1992: Budget Summary (Washington DC: US Government
Printing Office, 1992), p. 214
In an attempt to reinforce his dominance over the political spectrum, Nixon capitalized upon the fear which surrounded a legitimate public health issue by twisting it into an opportunity to stifle and alienate his political opponents. Nixon recognized that the American desire for government action regarding substance use essentially granted him the power to enact any reform which he pleased, seeing as due to the severity of the issue, the public would openly embrace any change to the status quo. Although Nixon initially increased allocated funding for drug-control agencies, he lacked any political force to truly implement stricter measures against drug use. Thus, demand for a federal means of enforcement spurred the creation of the Drug Enforcement
Adolph Lyons, a twenty-four year old African-American, was pulled over by four police officers with guns drawn, simply because he had a burned-out taillight. Lyons was ordered out of his vehicle, told to face the car, spread his legs and put his hands on his head. He obeyed. When Lyons complained about the car keys he was holding were causing him pain, an officer put Lyons into a chokehold and he lost consciousness. Lyons woke up coughing up blood, had defecated himself and suffered permanent damage to his larynx. The officer issued Lyons a traffic ticket for the burned-out taillight as a means to justify the officer’s action. Welcome to the war on drugs, where both male African-Americans and Latinos are subjected to traffic stops and a variety
Though President Nixon launched “The War on Drugs” in 1971, the most aggressive antidrug policies, including harsh mandatory prison sentences for possession of even small amounts of narcotics, were enacted during the Reagan administration. Thirty years later, 20 million Americans (roughly 1 in 15) use illegal drugs regularly. We seem to be losing the war. Some, including Columbia University neuroscientist Carl Hart, think we were fighting the wrong war to begin with.
The question of this investigation is: “To what extent did Nixon’s june 1971 speech, where declared a “Drugs are public enemy #1” for the first time, set the grounds for future anti-black political standpoints and mass incarceration of black and brown people?”
The War on Drugs, as previously stated, was first introduced by Nixon and reinforced by its preceding presidents. It is a campaign that was launched in 1971, by President Richard Nixon during his time in office, but was not enacted into full force until the 80s when Ronald Reagan was in office. Between 1980 and 1984, FBI anti-drug funding went from eight million to 95 million dollars. During the same time, funding for treatment and prevention was reduced (Florio 2016). As a result, convictions for drug offenses, after the announcement of the War on Drugs, are the single most important cause of the explosion of incarceration rates in the United States (Alexander 2012:60). That is to say that if the War on Drugs was not introduced and reinforced following Nixon, the United State’s prison system could have avoided mass incarceration, exceptionally for people of color. To illustrate, nothing has contributed more to the systematic mass incarceration of people of color in the United States than the War on Drugs (Alexander 2012:60). Sadly, it is more than obvious that it appears that the War on Drugs was a certain phenomenon that was distinctly formulated to target individuals of color. Although the War on Drugs was in reality created to diminish the drugs and punish those that were located with them, it did absolutely the opposite. Few would guess that the
Rosenfield, Jim. "The War on Drugs is a Great Success." The Ostrich File. Volume 6, March 20, 1996. (Online).
The war on drugs in our culture is a continuous action that is swiftly lessening our society. This has been going on for roughly 10-15 years and has yet to slow down in any way. Drugs continue to be a problem for the obvious reason that certain people abuse them in a way that can lead to ultimate harm on such a person. These drugs do not just consist of street drugs (marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy), but prescription medications as well. Although there are some instances where drugs are being used by subjects excessively, there has been medical research to prove that some of these drugs have made a successful impact on certain disorders and diseases.
Since 2006, a growing issue of drug smuggling and trafficking has arisen between Mexico and the United States. Not only does this issue affect the economies of the two countries but also the social life of the populations.
At even the national level, the “war on drugs” was just as detrimental. Reagan's narcotics policy had doubled both drug arrests and the prison population in the US. Under him, the media propaganda helped ignite public concern – sometimes bordering hysteria – which effectively created “a mandate for a massive campaign against drugs –an intensified federal enforcement effort, harsher prison sentences, and omnipresent narcotics surveillance of ordinary Americans.” Bush's “war on drugs”, an
Moore, L. D., & Elkavich, A. (2008). Who's Using and Who's Doing Time: Incarceration, the War on Drugs, and Public Health. American Journal Of Public Health, 98(5), 782-786.
Perhaps Americans take what they have for granted and forget that there are other countries with problems. Why does America care about what is happening in other countries like Columbia, when they have their own problems with drugs? The Untied States of America has a rather large drug trafficking problem but compared to Columbia it is fairly small. To help Columbia solve their problem the U.S. senate has decided to send troops over there and take control. This new involvement will have many consequences in and what can you make for instance the cost of a war, the loss and gain of jobs, and physical side effects.
The drug problem that overtook the United States was not just your average run of the mill small time street hustling drugs. The problem was much larger, with several contributing factors. During the 70s, at the beginning of the war on drugs, there
The drug policy “War on Drugs” implemented by the criminal justice system the in United States has failed to address the war with the use of drugs in America. The United States of America has fought for over a century, and four presidents have staged this war that has yet to produce significant results. It is a war that the US was losing and drug abusers were all over hospitals, courts, and prisons. The use of drugs has ended in violent crimes that have always resulted into damaging neighborhoods in this country, and many children have been lost and abandoned due to drug abuse (Friman, 2008).
Wolf, M. (2011, June 4). We should declare an end to our disastrous war on drugs. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.consortiumlibrary.org/docview/870200965?accountid=14473
Blurb: Women across Mexico have taken to the streets to publicly march and declare their stance against the ongoing corruption and abuse they have suffered during the decade-long war on drugs. On the eve of el Dia de Los Muertos this year, countless mothers, sisters, and friends, took to the streets to chant “ni una mas” (not one more) in protest of the number of women who have been kidnaped, raped, tortured, and murdered during the war on drugs. The time for women to integrate into the security sector, government, and peacebuilding efforts is now. http://ebuddynews.com/mexican-women-protest-violence-impunity-day-dead/ Ni Una Mas: Women’s’ Voices Matter in Mexico’s War on Drugs. “The war on drugs has normalized misogynistic violence” said