Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of mass media in political campaigns
The role of mass media in political campaigns
The role of mass media in political campaigns
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of mass media in political campaigns
At its simplest, the idea of Americanisation draws attention to the existence of practices that were first developed in the US and that were then adopted into other politics systems and absorbed into political communication practices (Negrine, 2008:152). The term ‘American model’ means “...campaigning in democracies around the world is becoming more and more Americanised as candidates, political parties, and news media take cues from their counterparts in the United States” (Swanson and Mancini, 1996:4). However, there is debate about what ‘American model’ of electoral campaigns really means, as the spread of practices used by the United States, could be due to a number of reasons such as the increase in technology, globalisation, and modernisation. This does not mean that political campaigns are becoming ‘Americanised’ but that they are just doing the things that have proven to provide results for winning elections.
The influence of the internet on political campaigns has been an interesting topic of study since the rise of the internet in the mid 1990s, (Anstead an Chadwick, 2008). Farrell, Kolodny, and Medvic, state that “...the campaign process has passed through three main stages of development...” (Farrell, et all, 2001:12). First, it was campaigns driven by newspaper, then television, and now by the rise of the digital media and technologies political campaigns have taken a whole on a direction. The noticeable internet campaign was the Howard Dean 2004, which showed that there was a new and more efficient way to campaigning by using the technological resources available. From here, political campaigns have transformed considerably, Obama ‘08 for example. The main features of post modern campaigns fall under these three h...
... middle of paper ...
...ss of politics and journalism’ Working paper,
Norris, P., (2000), A Virtuous Circle: Political Communication in Postindustrial Societies. [Assessed on 2/3/14 - http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~pnorris/Books/Virtuous%20Circle.htm].
Norris, P., (2004), ‘The evolution of election campaigns: Eroding political engagement?’
Smith, C. F., and Webster, W. R., (2004), ‘Members of the Scottish Parliamnet on the Net’ Information Polity, 9:67-80.
Swanson, D. L., and Mancini, P., (1996), Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences (Google eBook) (Greenwood Publishing Group).
The Electoral Commission, (2010), ‘UK general election 2010: Campaign spending report’ http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/109388/2010-UKPGE-Campaign-expenditure-report.pdf [Assessed on 6/3/14].
Cary, Mary Kate. "5 Ways New Media Are Changing Politics." 4 Feburary 2010. U.S. News. 14 October 2015
Sayers, Anthony M., and Lisa Young. "Election Campaign and Party Financing in Canada." Australian Democratic Audit. Canberra: Australian National University (2004).
Garner, R., Ferdinand, P., & Lawson, S. (2009). Introduction to politics. Oxford, England: Oxford UP.
A candidate cannot legitimately compete in modern American elections without being able to finance a huge television advertising campaign. Commercials have become an integral part of our...
For over 60 years, presidential campaigns have used television ads to communicate ideas and campaign plans to the American people. With hopes of influencing people to vote, politicians have used various tactics and strategies to persuade. After observing television campaign ads throughout the years, a few themes are observed.
In the article, Kaid spends a considerable amount of time noting the increased use of web-based advertising in American politics. She notes many advantages regarding this method including: low cost, infinite space, absence of media filters, allowance of direct communication, ability to target messages, and interactivity (35). In addition, Kaid also claims other countries are adopting American political marketing practices. For example, she states Greece has adopted new technologies leveraging SMS formats (40). In addition, other countries have also adopted other advertising methods such as using personal qualities over policy issues, reliance on pathos, adoption of professionalism, and reliance on opinion polls (41). At the end of Kaid's article, she notes where she believes priorities for political marketing lays. She claims television remains crucial because of visual imagery; yet, radio and
Brady, H. E., Johnston, R., & Sides, J. (2007, May 18). The Study of Political Campaigns. Retrieved November 16, 2011, from GWU: http://home.gwu.edu/~jsides/study.pdf
McGann, Anthony F. "POLITICAL ADVERTISING." Journal of Advertising Sept. 1984: 3. Communication & Mass Media Complete. Web. 2 Dec. 2013.
The aim of this paper is to look at the relationship between the mass media, specifically television, and presidential elections. This paper will focus on the function of television in presidential elections through three main areas: exit polls, presidential debates, and spots. The focus is on television for three reasons. First, television reaches more voters than any other medium. Second, television attracts the greatest part of presidential campaign budgets. Third, television provides the candidates a good opportunity to contact the people directly. A second main theme of this paper is the role of television in presidential elections in terms of representative democracy in the United States.
Stromback, J. (2008) Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13: 228-246.
Castells, Manuel. "Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society" International Journal of Communication 1 (2007), 238-266
Overall, print media has a great effect on shaping the minds of the masses, but in a very different way than that of broadcasted and social media. For one, it is arguably more selective than its other sources, as it can be easily taken out of context and altered by editors to achieve a certain result, or get across a very specific concept. Second, print media, while it can and many times does include important data and information, can also be filled with campaign hoopla, distracting its readers from the true issues and values of the candidates. Rather, campaign hoopla focuses readers on who is ahead during a specific time frame, and other trivial information to voters in the long run of an election. However, such disadvantages can also be turned into positives for the written media as a whole. For instance, the ability of the written media to alter data can be used to the benefit of its
As the times change, so does the latest technology. In the mid-1900's it was the television, before that the radio, and now in the late-20th and 21st century we have the internet. With the coming of every new media outlet audiences and media moguls migrate. Along with the migrations are the politicians who try to use the new form of media to more easily reach the public. It's come to the point where the internet increasingly work with democracy directly; some elections in the United States even going so far as to hold online polling in a general election. "Online voting is increasingly making its way int our political process," writes Vote.com President Dick Morris, "the 2000 Arizona Democratic Primary tallied 39,942 online votes," (Morris 1034). However, should the internet really be used to such degrees in the case of democracy? There is an ongoing debate among scholars on the topic. One thing to consider is whether or not the many accusations stating that the internet is an aid to terrorism outweigh the positive effects of how the internet has strengthened democracy and has had a crucial part in turning oppressed nations into less oppressed, democratic states. On the subject of terrorism being aided by the internet, making it easier for terrorist factions leaders to inform their people, could it not be argued that these factions leaders could use other means of communication, maybe only a little less effectively and therefore nullifying the accusation that the internet is the culprit? After extensive research, it's clear that the internet does not harm democracy; on the contrary, the internet strengthens it in a way that no other form of media has done before.
Social media including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube, Flicker, internet websites, and blogs are becoming mainstream attracting a younger more technology savvy voter. Many candidates in the last elections learned to use these mediums so not to overlook tech savvy voters and learned how to use these to their advantage. Candidates took to the internet to raise awareness, state views, and even successfully raised donations. Social media was able to provide instant feedback on the standing of a candidate often days or weeks sooner than a more traditional poll.
As Americans we take pride in our liberating government. But, it is essential to ask how much we, the general public, know about our democracy. Because of the representative structure of our government, it is in our best interest to remain as knowledgeable as possible about political affairs so that we can play an active role in our democracy by voting for candidates and issues. The media, which includes print, television, and the internet, is our primary link to political events and issues. (For the purposes of this essay only print and television will be considered.) Therefore, in order to assess the success of our democracy it is necessary to assess the soundness of our media. We are lucky enough to have a media, in theory, free from government influences because of our rights to freedom of press and freedom of speech, but we are still subject to the media’s interpretation and presentation of politics, as is the danger when depending on any source for information. So, we must address how the media informs us; how successful it is at doing so; and how we should respond to it.