Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Progressive and New Deal reforms
The New Deal and the unanticipated consequences of new deal reform
The New Deal and the unanticipated consequences of new deal reform
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Progressive and New Deal reforms
America and the Great Depression
1. Compare the ideas behind the protest movements of Huey Long and Upton Sinclair.
The Era of the Great Depression was one of both desperation and hope. Americans were desperate for a change, desperate for anything to come along that may improve their situation, yet hopeful that the light at the end of the tunnel was near. For many of those living in poverty during the 1930s, the “radical” leftist movements seen throughout the country appeared to be alternatives to the sometimes ineffective programs of FDR’s New Deal. Two such programs, Huey Long’s “Share Our Wealth” plan and Upton Sinclair’s End Poverty in California (EPIC) were fairly popular, mainly for their appealing alternatives to the current New Deal programs and ideals. Though the two movements were similar in some sense, both had different visions for the recovery of the American people.
Huey Long, two-time Senator of Louisiana, was founder of the “Share Our Wealth” plan. A redistribution of the nation’s wealth, the plan called for one third of the country’s money to be divided among all the people. In the early 1930s, 4% of the American population held 87% of the wealth. (Polenberg 127) Long’s plan called for an end to this imbalance. “None too poor, none too rich” was his slogan. (Polenberg 126)
The “Share Our Wealth” movement was made up of eight parts. A homestead allowance granted by the government to all families (and a limit on how large a family’s fortune could be), minimum family yearly incomes (and limits on excessive ones), better regulation of work hours (to prevent overproduction), an old-age pension, a balance between agricultural production and consumption, a pension for veterans and their disabled, ...
... middle of paper ...
...me president. Their programs however, did have lasting effects on the government at the time, causing it to shift towards the left in order to appease their supporters. The fact that two men with very different visions for the future of Americans could both be so popular while endorsing such radical changes only shows the true atmosphere of America in the Depression. Americans in poverty were willing to cling to any hope they could find, and though each did it in their own way, these men gave Americans that hope.
Bibliography
1. Biles, Roger. A New Deal for the American People. Northern Illinois
University Press. DeKalb, 1991.
2. Polenberg, Richard. The Era of Franklin D. Roosevelt 1933-1945. Bedford/St.
Martin’s. Boston, 2000.
3. Terkel, Studs. Boston, 2000.
4. Terkel, Studs. Hard Times. The New Press. New York, 1970
The American people began to view Hoover’s ideas of the ideal small government as conservative, while Roosevelt’s progressive policies became the representation of liberalism. Therefore, it can be said that the Great Depression was a major contributing factor in changing the way in which Americans differentiated between liberalist and conservative beliefs. As a result of this shift in America’s perception of these policies, Roosevelt became a liberal in the eyes of the people, whereas Hoover gained the reputation of a conservative. However, these former presidents are noted for occasionally supporting similar policies. The Great Depression hit the United States while Hoover was serving his first and only term as president.
In 1929, the stock market crashed, bringing great ruin to our country. The result, the Great Depression, was a time of hardship for everyone around the world. The economy in the US was lower than ever and people were suffering immensely. During these trying times, two presidents served- Herbert Hoover and Franklin Delano Roosevelt (F.D.R.) Both had different views on how the depression should be handled, with Hoover believing that the people could solve the issue themselves with no government involvement, and with F.D.R. believing that the government should work for their people in such difficult times.
In the 1930s, the time of the Great Depression, most Americans were struggling merely to survive while a select few hoarded the collective wealth of the nation. A man named Huey P. Long stands out from many other politicians and promoted economic equality across Americans. In his speech “Every Man a King,” he blames the rich for the strife of the poor. As a lawyer from a poor agricultural community, Long became the advocate for farmers in Louisiana.
Franklin D. Roosevelt once asserted “I pledge you, I pledge myself, to a new deal for the American people,” in belief for a change, for a better nation, and for guidance to those who have lost all faith in humanity. During the Great Depression, the United States faced many different scenarios in which it caused people to doubt and question the “American Dream.” The Great Depression began in 1929 and ended in 1939. In these ten years, people went through unemployment, poverty, banks failed and people lost hope. President Herbert Hoover thought it wasn’t his responsibility to try and fix such issues in the nation.
"America's Great Depression and Roosevelt's New Deal."DPLA. Digital Public Library of America. Web. 20 Nov 2013. .
During the 1920’s, America was a prosperous nation going through the “Big Boom” and loving every second of it. However, this fortune didn’t last long, because with the 1930’s came a period of serious economic recession, a period called the Great Depression. By 1933, a quarter of the nation’s workers (about 40 million) were without jobs. The weekly income rate dropped from $24.76 per week in 1929 to $16.65 per week in 1933 (McElvaine, 8). After President Hoover failed to rectify the recession situation, Franklin D. Roosevelt began his term with the hopeful New Deal. In two installments, Roosevelt hoped to relieve short term suffering with the first, and redistribution of money amongst the poor with the second. Throughout these years of the depression, many Americans spoke their minds through pen and paper. Many criticized Hoover’s policies of the early Depression and praised the Roosevelts’ efforts. Each opinion about the causes and solutions of the Great Depression are based upon economic, racial and social standing in America.
Thesis The Progressive Era and the New Deal Era had a significant amount of similarities with policies and programs to reform the American society and improve lives and fight poverty in America. Although the Progressive and New Deal Era had many similarities, there were still differences between them. Both the Progressive and the New Deal Era’s main goal was to improve American society. Both of the Progressive and New Deal’s accomplishments were rooted in the economic depression and the need for change before the era, the Guilded age in the 19th century for the Progressive era, and the Great Depression for the New Deal era. As the Guilded Age was ending, and the Progressive Era was emerging, most American families had to live with the harsh reality of sweatshops, slums, child labor, corruption in government and businesses, disease, and racial prejudice.
The Great Depression was a period, which seemed to go out of control. The crashing of the stock markets left most Canadians unemployed and in debt, prairie farmers suffered immensely with the inability to produce valuable crops, and the Canadian Government and World War II became influential factors in the ending of the Great Depression.
New Nationalism focused on eradicating economic inequality. In 2007, the top 1 percent of Americans owned 23.5 percent of the nation’s wealth (Pear, 2011). This problem has increased, not gone away, since Roosevelt addressed it in 1910. Unfairness in the tax code has become a prominent topic of political discussion. President Obama called for alterations to the U.S. tax system, which allows millionaires to pay lower rates than middle-class workers like teachers and firefighters, in his 2012 State of the Union address (“Remarks of President Barack Obama – As prepared for delivery State of the Union Address,” 2012.). In December, the president traveled to Osawatomie to speak. He echoed Roosevelt’s New Nationalism, saying he believes “this country succeeds when everyone gets a fair shot, when everyone does their fair share” (Fox, 2011). Although he spoke in Os...
Great Depression was one of the most severe economic situation the world had ever seen. It all started during late 1929 and lasted till 1939. Although, the origin of depression was United Sattes but with US Economy being highly correlated with global economy, the ill efffects were seen in the whole world with high unemployment, low production and deflation. Overall it was the most severe depression ever faced by western industrialized world. Stock Market Crashes, Bank Failures and a lot more, left the governments ineffective and this lead the global economy to what we call today- ‘’Great Depression’’.(Rockoff). As for the cause and what lead to Great Depression, the issue is still in debate among eminent economists, but the crux provides evidence that the worst ever depression ever expereinced by Global Economy stemed from multiple causes which are as follows:
Huey Long during a radio broadcast was explaining his populist plan of wealth redistribution to fix the country’s high poverty problem. Long then lists several solutions that he and the Share Our Wealth Society stand for. Long’s first solution is to regulate the minimum and maximum amount of wealth a family can have. With this, every family should have a house and live comfortably whether they are rich or poor. Next, Huey long proposes to control the amount of income a family could have. No family should have less than one-third of the average income, and that a family can’t earn more than three hundred times the average income. Then, Long suggests that everyone over the age of sixty should have
The United States faced the worst economic downfall in history during the Great Depression. A domino effect devastated every aspect of the economy, unemployment rate was at an all time high, banks were declaring bankruptcy and the frustration of the general public led to the highest suicide rates America has ever encountered. In the 1930’s Franklin D Roosevelt introduced the New Deal reforms, which aimed to “reconcile democracy, individual liberty and economic planning” (Liberty 863). The New Deal reforms were effective in the short term but faced criticism as it transformed the role of government and shaped the lives of American citizens.
Income inequality is one of the biggest indicators of the Gilded Age. During the Gilded Age there were huge disparities between the rich and poor which were often fueled by corruption. It was a time that was characterized by ruthless pursuit of profit, conspicuous consumption, government corruption, and vulgarity in taste and manners. With the American myth of the self-made man being wide-spread, it became socially acceptable to look down on the poor as unworthy because the elite society held that an earnest person could “pull themselves up by the bootstraps” if they were experiencing hard times (Nash 549). Income inequality was a defining factor of the Gilded Age, and compares similarly to the income inequality of today. Those who are within the top 1 percent in terms of wealth in the United States in the current era also have a large amount of control over the wealth in the United States. The 400 wealthiest Americans now own more than all of the rest of Americans (150 million) put together (Schulz 1). It has been found that almost two thirds of United States net private assets are concentrated in the hands of five percent of Americans (Schulz 1). Income distribution today is actually more uneven then during the first Gilded Age (Wagner
Huey Long launched his “Share Our Wealth” idea in 1934, a platform deliberated to offer good standards of living to all citizens of the United States. The document was important in the efforts to recuperate the lost glory in the American economy without affecting the poor. Notably, Huey used the document to spread the idea of sharing the nation’s wealth equally among all people regardless of their economic status (Long, 2010). The purpose of the document was to arouse the need to set aside personal aspirations and set fourth fair platform for success to all citizens. The paper is important today because it calls for personal obligation to all people- the leaders and the led, women and men. When everyone acts on the same platform for the welfare
The Gospel of Wealth by Andrew Carnegie is the most well-known essay of the famous industrialist turned philanthropist in which Carnegie stated what he saw as the problem in which the way wealth was administered in society. Although he did not loathe for a small portion of the population controlling most of the country’s money in reality Carnegie suggested it was needed for a wealth gap to be present while not everybody can have the fanciest things it’s important as it ensures that there is always progress being done to ensure a better quality of life for the lower class as the bar is constantly being raised to prevent a halt in the race of development. “This change, however, is not to be deplored, but welcomed as highly beneficial. It is well, nay, essential for the progress of the race, that the houses of some should be homes for all that is