Abstract
This essay evaluates the development of the EMU; a system that only came into effect three years ago. Through the lack of recent literature most of the evidence are derived from articles of various sources.
The essay takes into consideration that the EMU is embedded in a generally declining world economy.
Analyzing the process leading up to the euro and the looking at the possible advantages and disadvantages that will result from the new currency are the key issues of this essay. The first section looks at some of the requirements leading up to the euro, including some of the specific fiscal goals required by the EMU regarding prospective members in 1999. The second section looks at some of the economic reasons for European Union countries to adopt the euro, focusing on the elimination of exchange rate fluctuations, increase trade overseas and across borders, and expanding markets for business as some of the advantages of euro currency countries. Price transparency, another advantage of the euro, is the focus for section three. Price transparency is the ability to easily recognize price differences between countries, which was not possible pre-euro. The paper then points on some effects of the euro on American businesses its economy. The updating of financial and accounting IT systems was the main adjustment discussed that U.S. multinationals must deal with. The paper then briefly looks at tourism, and how that industry of Europe is affected by the euro. The paper then looks at the euro introduction from a political standpoint, explaining if the EU goal of “political unity” is actually possible. The essay finally discusses the future of the currency, asking the question “Can the euro survive?”
Recently in Europe and its neighboring countries, the talk has been about the newly installed euro into the ever- growing European market. The euro has been the new
Europe consists of several sovereign countries which use their own currency prior to the creation of the European Union in 1993. The EU has been built through several binding treaties and laws that harmonize European states when it comes to political issues and economic issues. It was until the Maastricht Treaty of 1999 that established a single currency known as the euro. The euro’s purpose is to have a single currency in Europe, similar to a single currency in the United States. Since Europe’s countries are closely tied together, the goal of the currency is to trade easier with one another, as well as sharing fiscal and exchange rates. Currently, there are roughly about 17 members from the EU who uses the euro as their currency and it is known that once a country joins the Union, it must quickly adopt to use the euro to enter the market for goods, services, and trade among member states. This adoption of a single currency has been the talk for a decade as well as in literature and scholarly articles. Throughout the course of this paper, it would look at two countries that refuse to adopt the euro: Sweden and the United Kingdom. The paper would answer questions that surround the euro ever since it was created, such as national identity issues of both countries, how it affects political leadership, and the economic costs and benefits of adopting the euro. Ultimately, it would answer a research topic whether the euro will overall rise or fall in Europe.
Integration in the EU and Monetary Policy
The creation of the European Union (EU) is a great political and economic feat. For it is the ultimate sign of cooperation between nations that had been in constant rivalry before. Nevertheless, the ideals of such a union cannot stand alone without having a strong foundation and continuos rational decision making by all of the actors involved.
“The introduction of the euro will represent the most dramatic change in the international monetary system since President Nixon took the dollar off gold in 1971 [and when] the era of flexible exchange rates began…the euro is likely to challenge the position of the dollar [and hence] this may be the most important event in the history of the international monetary system since the dollar took over from the pound the role of dominant currency in World War I” (Mussa 2002).
Webb, J., Laca, P., Chamonikolas, K., & Skolimowski, P. (2011). Joining the Euro: What's the Hurry?. Bloomberg Businessweek, (4212), 10-14. Retrieved October 11, 2011, from EBSCOhost.
It is no huge secret as to the cause of the weakness of the Euro in relation to the dollar. The American economy is developing successfully, while the European, especially that of Germany and Italy, at best running in place. In addition, in Europe, as noted recently in the findings of the auditing company, Price Waterhouse Coopers, disproportions are growing between the quickly developing countries of the European periphery- such as Finland, Portugal and Ireland- and the slowly growing economies of the largest part of the Euro. To the former not only Italy and Germany apply but France as well.
The crisis has led to an increase in negative stereotyping within EU countries – the hardworking and self-disciplined North against the lazy South. In particular, there is growing resentment among German taxpayers at the thought of bailing out their Greek neighbors from their debts. In Germany, there exists a growing nostalgia for the old currency, the Deutschemark. According to Cris Short, many see the European Monetary Union (EMU) as a “transfer union” where money is transferred from the prudent northern European countries to the profligate South. The currency that was designed to unite Europe has now intensified the cultural differences that exist within EU member states and divided the continent.
The European Union has been helped economically ever since World War II. Right after World War II’s end, Europe was struggling to hold on. The countries of the modern-day European Union thought it would be a good idea to come together and help each others struggling economy. To this day, this decision has had a very positive outcome on the EU’s economy. As shown in Diagram 1, the European Union combined together has the world’s highest GDP at 18.3 Trillion USD as compared to the United States’ 17.4 Trillion USD GDP and China’s 10.4 Trillion USD GDP. The idea