Should The U.S. End Overseas Military Operations?
The U.S. has been sending troops to over-sea countries to aid the needy, and take certain measures to try to keep our country safe. We want to help the innocent lives, care for the civilians, and want them to be free.
American Foreign Policy :Realpolitik vs. Human Rights
(1)Should the U.S sometimes pursue realpolitik and sometimes human rights? In other words, is it acceptable for the U.S. to someimes anything even support dictators, if it is good for the nation, sometimes pursue moral priciples when it can reasonably do so?.(2) I think the U.S. should do what is in the best interest of the United States for example, (3)Just one day after the French surrender at Dien Bien Phu, an international conference to settle the Indochina conflict began in Geneva, Switzerland. There , representatives of the French and Vietminh attempted to to map out Indochina’s future. Cambodia, Great Britain, Laos, the People’s Replublic of China, The Soviet, and the United States.
The United States on several occasions have had to enforce the Monroe Doctrine and police international lands, our power to stop tyranny, corruption and our desire to maintain international unity will continually allow the United States to remain the great Nation that it is.
Over the last several years the United States has suffered several losses and devastating events. Most of these could have and should have been at a minimal level if the government would have done its job correctly. Terrorist attacks on the United States have shown the rest of the world our weakness.
When our government makes decisions on Foreign policy they do not only affect those countries which are involved with the U.S. These decisions also affect the citizens of our nation. Many people in America today are concerned about domestic issues such as their health benefits, the price of their mortgage or rent, the price of gas, their family. The list could go on and on, most of these issues are not purely domestic, foreign policy could and does in some affect every one of these issues. Naturally as citizens we typically focus on those issues that are directly affecting the way they live here in the U.S. before thinking about how the U.S. decisions affect countries abroad. The government’s goal is to make decisions that are in the best interest of the nation both domestically as well as abroad.
As stronger nations exercise their control over weaker ones, the United States try to prove their authority, power and control over weaker nations seeing them as unable to handle their own issues thereby, imposing their ideology on them. And if any of these weaker nations try to resist, then the wrath of the United States will come upon them. In overthrow the author Stephen Kinzer tells how Americans used different means to overthrow foreign government. He explains that the campaign & ideology of anti- communism made Americans believe that it was their right and historical obligation to lead forces of good against those of iniquity. They also overthrew foreign government, when economic interest coincided with their ideological ones (kinzer.215). These factors were the reasons behind America’s intervention in Iran, Guatemala, South Vietnam and Chile to control and protect multinational companies as well as the campaign against communism with little or no knowledge about these countries.
This has had large negative impacts on the world, and some have argued that it is a major factor in the political unrest in the Middle East. Before we get involved in conflicts that we are not related to, we need to think about whether or not the countries involved want us to jump in; if we want to improve our relations with other countries, we need to make sure that they are on board with some of our decisions. If we are not involved in a conflict, but still join in, it sets a precedent that we are policing the rest of the world, and this increases tensions between us and the countries that do not want us joining in on other countries’ affairs. We can not have good relations with countries in the Middle East if they do not want us
The Failure of the American Policy
Chapter twelve of Charles Murray's book Loosing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950-1980 is entitled Incentives to Fail I: Maximizing Short-Term Gains. I believe that this title is very fitting and aims directly at the center of an issue of American policy, which has been characterized by many, both Democrats and Republicans as a failure. The social policy that was discussed is the American Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), which was designed to combat poverty in America by giving individuals money for food and medicine.
Though out history, American has had its hand in conflict with other countries. Some of those conflicts have turned out into wars. Looking back at America’s “track record” with war, America has a worthy past of having its citizen’s support. Obviously the two World Wars we not controversial. The United States in the Korean War was criticized, fairly, for its strategy, but the need to defend South Korea was never questioned. In only the Vietnam War was the United States’ very participation criticized. This is such a gigantic change with prior wars that it bears study as to why it happened, and better yet, should have it happened. This paper will discuss the United States’ involvement in the Vietnam War, by asking the simple question, Should have the Untied States’ gotten involved into the first place. This paper will prove that in fact, America should have not gotten involved with the Vietnam War.
The easiest argument to restrict our dealings with the international community can be summed up in one word: the Constitution. Many read the clauses dealing with treaties and alliances as providing a basis of foreign policy to serve the best interests of the nation (USTP Party Platform). Nowhere does the US Constitution imply that the government is obligated or even allowed to take on the problems of the world, or to use the nation's resources to act in any way other than to directly further its interests. But the Constitution was written many years ago, when the nation was smaller, not nearly the global power it is today. The writers had no way of predicting how much it would change in o...